Co-workers using informal language for communication

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
12
down vote

favorite












At my office we make heavy use of IM (ex. Skype) for communication, partially since half our team is offshore. However people commonly disregard spelling and make excessive use abbreviations resulting in conversation which can be difficult to understand.



For example a message might looks like




talk 2 evrey on l8r




rather than




Talk to everyone later.




While I understand that proper grammar is normally disregarded in chat, it can downright confusing trying to understand what people are trying to say.



The tricky part for me is I am an intern who has been with the company for about a month and as such feel it could be rude asking people to communicate more clearly. Clearly this practice has been accepted by the rest of the group and I will only be around for a few more months. Do I just tough it out and ask for clarification as required or raise it as something the group could do better?



Ps. XKCD knows how I feel:



XKCD writing st







share|improve this question






















  • Politely ask for clarification every single time annoying acronyms, slang or 1337speak pops up. Maybe you can condition them to use proper English ;-)
    – René Roth
    Jun 1 '14 at 16:34
















up vote
12
down vote

favorite












At my office we make heavy use of IM (ex. Skype) for communication, partially since half our team is offshore. However people commonly disregard spelling and make excessive use abbreviations resulting in conversation which can be difficult to understand.



For example a message might looks like




talk 2 evrey on l8r




rather than




Talk to everyone later.




While I understand that proper grammar is normally disregarded in chat, it can downright confusing trying to understand what people are trying to say.



The tricky part for me is I am an intern who has been with the company for about a month and as such feel it could be rude asking people to communicate more clearly. Clearly this practice has been accepted by the rest of the group and I will only be around for a few more months. Do I just tough it out and ask for clarification as required or raise it as something the group could do better?



Ps. XKCD knows how I feel:



XKCD writing st







share|improve this question






















  • Politely ask for clarification every single time annoying acronyms, slang or 1337speak pops up. Maybe you can condition them to use proper English ;-)
    – René Roth
    Jun 1 '14 at 16:34












up vote
12
down vote

favorite









up vote
12
down vote

favorite











At my office we make heavy use of IM (ex. Skype) for communication, partially since half our team is offshore. However people commonly disregard spelling and make excessive use abbreviations resulting in conversation which can be difficult to understand.



For example a message might looks like




talk 2 evrey on l8r




rather than




Talk to everyone later.




While I understand that proper grammar is normally disregarded in chat, it can downright confusing trying to understand what people are trying to say.



The tricky part for me is I am an intern who has been with the company for about a month and as such feel it could be rude asking people to communicate more clearly. Clearly this practice has been accepted by the rest of the group and I will only be around for a few more months. Do I just tough it out and ask for clarification as required or raise it as something the group could do better?



Ps. XKCD knows how I feel:



XKCD writing st







share|improve this question














At my office we make heavy use of IM (ex. Skype) for communication, partially since half our team is offshore. However people commonly disregard spelling and make excessive use abbreviations resulting in conversation which can be difficult to understand.



For example a message might looks like




talk 2 evrey on l8r




rather than




Talk to everyone later.




While I understand that proper grammar is normally disregarded in chat, it can downright confusing trying to understand what people are trying to say.



The tricky part for me is I am an intern who has been with the company for about a month and as such feel it could be rude asking people to communicate more clearly. Clearly this practice has been accepted by the rest of the group and I will only be around for a few more months. Do I just tough it out and ask for clarification as required or raise it as something the group could do better?



Ps. XKCD knows how I feel:



XKCD writing st









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 10 '17 at 9:42









Community♦

1




1










asked May 31 '14 at 4:54









Ian Holstead

1,0111230




1,0111230











  • Politely ask for clarification every single time annoying acronyms, slang or 1337speak pops up. Maybe you can condition them to use proper English ;-)
    – René Roth
    Jun 1 '14 at 16:34
















  • Politely ask for clarification every single time annoying acronyms, slang or 1337speak pops up. Maybe you can condition them to use proper English ;-)
    – René Roth
    Jun 1 '14 at 16:34















Politely ask for clarification every single time annoying acronyms, slang or 1337speak pops up. Maybe you can condition them to use proper English ;-)
– René Roth
Jun 1 '14 at 16:34




Politely ask for clarification every single time annoying acronyms, slang or 1337speak pops up. Maybe you can condition them to use proper English ;-)
– René Roth
Jun 1 '14 at 16:34










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
8
down vote



accepted











Do I just tough it out and ask for clarification as required or raise
it as something the group could do better?




My suggestion would be to consider having a private chat with a couple of co-workers to see what they suggest. I suspect there may be some that are more likely to make typos and there is something to be said for how some people may not make typos in some circumstances compared to others,e.g. if there is a production issue that requires coordinating a few people together then the person that usually makes typos may type perfectly for a while. The main reason for having these chats is to just see if this has been raised previously and what would make sense here as there may be more to the story than what you already know.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Since they are communicating with you,you have the right to ask for clarification at any time. You should also escalate with your boss.



    Typos on top of excessive abbreviations are not a happy combination. One of the things I hated about learning English, by the way, is how a single comma out of place can change the meaning of a whole sentence.



    I personally find IM-type abbreviations distateful because the use of proper,unambiguous language takes only a few more keystrokes. It's simply lazy to communicate that way and it increases the probability of misunderstandings and non-understandings. And if there is one thing we don't need in a professional environment, it's misunderstandings and non-understandings. In case anyone is wondering, I have used IM for years in connection with a former employer.






    share|improve this answer






















    • While it may or may not apply to the OP, the reason IM-type abbreviations came about is because of the number of character limits placed by early electronic communication mechanisms. This later evolved into being a way for kids to talk in "code" that their parents wouldn't understand. As things evolved, for many "younger" people, it is more natural to type this way. Also, an extra character or 2 can be a big deal. I tried using my son's Ipod last night and my fingers are too big to hit the correct letters. Had me cursing. Saving a character or 2 really helps with those on-screen keyboards.
      – Dunk
      Jun 2 '14 at 19:56






    • 1




      Yeah, not only can a single comma change the meaining of sentence, but also a single upper/lower case change. Consider: "I helped my uncle Jack off a horse."
      – Olin Lathrop
      Jun 2 '14 at 20:10

















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Chatting is generally considered to communicate more ideas quickly. So it is fine to use informal communication as it is generally easy to understand and delivers clear ideas in less words.



    But short hands are not helpful if they are not understandable. I would recommend them to continue using the chatting style they are using. And would like you to point out right when you don't understand. This would let them know that not everyone in group is aware of their shortcuts, hence they need to use more standard version of words.



    Also, with time, you will start understanding their intent.
    Also as this is informal communication, no one would feel offended if someone asks them to elaborate more on the meaning.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Thanks. Somebody recommending that you adapt instead of expecting others to conform to your desires. That's quite a departation from today's me, me, me society.
      – Dunk
      Jun 2 '14 at 19:59










    • On the other hand, if the adaption doesn't "take", it can add stress to the job and problems...despite being a little thing...that builds resentment. It's not a me, me, me society thing so much as a "my brain must take time to analyze and process this and I'm too tired to keep doing this every #$%^ time ARGH" stressor. Brain wiring does weird things.
      – Bart Silverstrim
      Jun 11 '14 at 20:30










    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: false,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24726%2fco-workers-using-informal-language-for-communication%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

























    StackExchange.ready(function ()
    $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
    var showEditor = function()
    $("#show-editor-button").hide();
    $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
    StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
    ;

    var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
    if(useFancy == 'True')
    var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
    var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
    var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

    $(this).loadPopup(
    url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
    loaded: function(popup)
    var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
    var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
    var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

    pTitle.text(popupTitle);
    pBody.html(popupBody);
    pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

    )
    else
    var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
    if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
    showEditor();


    );
    );






    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    8
    down vote



    accepted











    Do I just tough it out and ask for clarification as required or raise
    it as something the group could do better?




    My suggestion would be to consider having a private chat with a couple of co-workers to see what they suggest. I suspect there may be some that are more likely to make typos and there is something to be said for how some people may not make typos in some circumstances compared to others,e.g. if there is a production issue that requires coordinating a few people together then the person that usually makes typos may type perfectly for a while. The main reason for having these chats is to just see if this has been raised previously and what would make sense here as there may be more to the story than what you already know.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      8
      down vote



      accepted











      Do I just tough it out and ask for clarification as required or raise
      it as something the group could do better?




      My suggestion would be to consider having a private chat with a couple of co-workers to see what they suggest. I suspect there may be some that are more likely to make typos and there is something to be said for how some people may not make typos in some circumstances compared to others,e.g. if there is a production issue that requires coordinating a few people together then the person that usually makes typos may type perfectly for a while. The main reason for having these chats is to just see if this has been raised previously and what would make sense here as there may be more to the story than what you already know.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        8
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        8
        down vote



        accepted







        Do I just tough it out and ask for clarification as required or raise
        it as something the group could do better?




        My suggestion would be to consider having a private chat with a couple of co-workers to see what they suggest. I suspect there may be some that are more likely to make typos and there is something to be said for how some people may not make typos in some circumstances compared to others,e.g. if there is a production issue that requires coordinating a few people together then the person that usually makes typos may type perfectly for a while. The main reason for having these chats is to just see if this has been raised previously and what would make sense here as there may be more to the story than what you already know.






        share|improve this answer













        Do I just tough it out and ask for clarification as required or raise
        it as something the group could do better?




        My suggestion would be to consider having a private chat with a couple of co-workers to see what they suggest. I suspect there may be some that are more likely to make typos and there is something to be said for how some people may not make typos in some circumstances compared to others,e.g. if there is a production issue that requires coordinating a few people together then the person that usually makes typos may type perfectly for a while. The main reason for having these chats is to just see if this has been raised previously and what would make sense here as there may be more to the story than what you already know.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 31 '14 at 5:06









        JB King

        15.1k22957




        15.1k22957






















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Since they are communicating with you,you have the right to ask for clarification at any time. You should also escalate with your boss.



            Typos on top of excessive abbreviations are not a happy combination. One of the things I hated about learning English, by the way, is how a single comma out of place can change the meaning of a whole sentence.



            I personally find IM-type abbreviations distateful because the use of proper,unambiguous language takes only a few more keystrokes. It's simply lazy to communicate that way and it increases the probability of misunderstandings and non-understandings. And if there is one thing we don't need in a professional environment, it's misunderstandings and non-understandings. In case anyone is wondering, I have used IM for years in connection with a former employer.






            share|improve this answer






















            • While it may or may not apply to the OP, the reason IM-type abbreviations came about is because of the number of character limits placed by early electronic communication mechanisms. This later evolved into being a way for kids to talk in "code" that their parents wouldn't understand. As things evolved, for many "younger" people, it is more natural to type this way. Also, an extra character or 2 can be a big deal. I tried using my son's Ipod last night and my fingers are too big to hit the correct letters. Had me cursing. Saving a character or 2 really helps with those on-screen keyboards.
              – Dunk
              Jun 2 '14 at 19:56






            • 1




              Yeah, not only can a single comma change the meaining of sentence, but also a single upper/lower case change. Consider: "I helped my uncle Jack off a horse."
              – Olin Lathrop
              Jun 2 '14 at 20:10














            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Since they are communicating with you,you have the right to ask for clarification at any time. You should also escalate with your boss.



            Typos on top of excessive abbreviations are not a happy combination. One of the things I hated about learning English, by the way, is how a single comma out of place can change the meaning of a whole sentence.



            I personally find IM-type abbreviations distateful because the use of proper,unambiguous language takes only a few more keystrokes. It's simply lazy to communicate that way and it increases the probability of misunderstandings and non-understandings. And if there is one thing we don't need in a professional environment, it's misunderstandings and non-understandings. In case anyone is wondering, I have used IM for years in connection with a former employer.






            share|improve this answer






















            • While it may or may not apply to the OP, the reason IM-type abbreviations came about is because of the number of character limits placed by early electronic communication mechanisms. This later evolved into being a way for kids to talk in "code" that their parents wouldn't understand. As things evolved, for many "younger" people, it is more natural to type this way. Also, an extra character or 2 can be a big deal. I tried using my son's Ipod last night and my fingers are too big to hit the correct letters. Had me cursing. Saving a character or 2 really helps with those on-screen keyboards.
              – Dunk
              Jun 2 '14 at 19:56






            • 1




              Yeah, not only can a single comma change the meaining of sentence, but also a single upper/lower case change. Consider: "I helped my uncle Jack off a horse."
              – Olin Lathrop
              Jun 2 '14 at 20:10












            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            Since they are communicating with you,you have the right to ask for clarification at any time. You should also escalate with your boss.



            Typos on top of excessive abbreviations are not a happy combination. One of the things I hated about learning English, by the way, is how a single comma out of place can change the meaning of a whole sentence.



            I personally find IM-type abbreviations distateful because the use of proper,unambiguous language takes only a few more keystrokes. It's simply lazy to communicate that way and it increases the probability of misunderstandings and non-understandings. And if there is one thing we don't need in a professional environment, it's misunderstandings and non-understandings. In case anyone is wondering, I have used IM for years in connection with a former employer.






            share|improve this answer














            Since they are communicating with you,you have the right to ask for clarification at any time. You should also escalate with your boss.



            Typos on top of excessive abbreviations are not a happy combination. One of the things I hated about learning English, by the way, is how a single comma out of place can change the meaning of a whole sentence.



            I personally find IM-type abbreviations distateful because the use of proper,unambiguous language takes only a few more keystrokes. It's simply lazy to communicate that way and it increases the probability of misunderstandings and non-understandings. And if there is one thing we don't need in a professional environment, it's misunderstandings and non-understandings. In case anyone is wondering, I have used IM for years in connection with a former employer.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited May 31 '14 at 10:16

























            answered May 31 '14 at 10:10









            Vietnhi Phuvan

            68.9k7118254




            68.9k7118254











            • While it may or may not apply to the OP, the reason IM-type abbreviations came about is because of the number of character limits placed by early electronic communication mechanisms. This later evolved into being a way for kids to talk in "code" that their parents wouldn't understand. As things evolved, for many "younger" people, it is more natural to type this way. Also, an extra character or 2 can be a big deal. I tried using my son's Ipod last night and my fingers are too big to hit the correct letters. Had me cursing. Saving a character or 2 really helps with those on-screen keyboards.
              – Dunk
              Jun 2 '14 at 19:56






            • 1




              Yeah, not only can a single comma change the meaining of sentence, but also a single upper/lower case change. Consider: "I helped my uncle Jack off a horse."
              – Olin Lathrop
              Jun 2 '14 at 20:10
















            • While it may or may not apply to the OP, the reason IM-type abbreviations came about is because of the number of character limits placed by early electronic communication mechanisms. This later evolved into being a way for kids to talk in "code" that their parents wouldn't understand. As things evolved, for many "younger" people, it is more natural to type this way. Also, an extra character or 2 can be a big deal. I tried using my son's Ipod last night and my fingers are too big to hit the correct letters. Had me cursing. Saving a character or 2 really helps with those on-screen keyboards.
              – Dunk
              Jun 2 '14 at 19:56






            • 1




              Yeah, not only can a single comma change the meaining of sentence, but also a single upper/lower case change. Consider: "I helped my uncle Jack off a horse."
              – Olin Lathrop
              Jun 2 '14 at 20:10















            While it may or may not apply to the OP, the reason IM-type abbreviations came about is because of the number of character limits placed by early electronic communication mechanisms. This later evolved into being a way for kids to talk in "code" that their parents wouldn't understand. As things evolved, for many "younger" people, it is more natural to type this way. Also, an extra character or 2 can be a big deal. I tried using my son's Ipod last night and my fingers are too big to hit the correct letters. Had me cursing. Saving a character or 2 really helps with those on-screen keyboards.
            – Dunk
            Jun 2 '14 at 19:56




            While it may or may not apply to the OP, the reason IM-type abbreviations came about is because of the number of character limits placed by early electronic communication mechanisms. This later evolved into being a way for kids to talk in "code" that their parents wouldn't understand. As things evolved, for many "younger" people, it is more natural to type this way. Also, an extra character or 2 can be a big deal. I tried using my son's Ipod last night and my fingers are too big to hit the correct letters. Had me cursing. Saving a character or 2 really helps with those on-screen keyboards.
            – Dunk
            Jun 2 '14 at 19:56




            1




            1




            Yeah, not only can a single comma change the meaining of sentence, but also a single upper/lower case change. Consider: "I helped my uncle Jack off a horse."
            – Olin Lathrop
            Jun 2 '14 at 20:10




            Yeah, not only can a single comma change the meaining of sentence, but also a single upper/lower case change. Consider: "I helped my uncle Jack off a horse."
            – Olin Lathrop
            Jun 2 '14 at 20:10










            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Chatting is generally considered to communicate more ideas quickly. So it is fine to use informal communication as it is generally easy to understand and delivers clear ideas in less words.



            But short hands are not helpful if they are not understandable. I would recommend them to continue using the chatting style they are using. And would like you to point out right when you don't understand. This would let them know that not everyone in group is aware of their shortcuts, hence they need to use more standard version of words.



            Also, with time, you will start understanding their intent.
            Also as this is informal communication, no one would feel offended if someone asks them to elaborate more on the meaning.






            share|improve this answer






















            • Thanks. Somebody recommending that you adapt instead of expecting others to conform to your desires. That's quite a departation from today's me, me, me society.
              – Dunk
              Jun 2 '14 at 19:59










            • On the other hand, if the adaption doesn't "take", it can add stress to the job and problems...despite being a little thing...that builds resentment. It's not a me, me, me society thing so much as a "my brain must take time to analyze and process this and I'm too tired to keep doing this every #$%^ time ARGH" stressor. Brain wiring does weird things.
              – Bart Silverstrim
              Jun 11 '14 at 20:30














            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Chatting is generally considered to communicate more ideas quickly. So it is fine to use informal communication as it is generally easy to understand and delivers clear ideas in less words.



            But short hands are not helpful if they are not understandable. I would recommend them to continue using the chatting style they are using. And would like you to point out right when you don't understand. This would let them know that not everyone in group is aware of their shortcuts, hence they need to use more standard version of words.



            Also, with time, you will start understanding their intent.
            Also as this is informal communication, no one would feel offended if someone asks them to elaborate more on the meaning.






            share|improve this answer






















            • Thanks. Somebody recommending that you adapt instead of expecting others to conform to your desires. That's quite a departation from today's me, me, me society.
              – Dunk
              Jun 2 '14 at 19:59










            • On the other hand, if the adaption doesn't "take", it can add stress to the job and problems...despite being a little thing...that builds resentment. It's not a me, me, me society thing so much as a "my brain must take time to analyze and process this and I'm too tired to keep doing this every #$%^ time ARGH" stressor. Brain wiring does weird things.
              – Bart Silverstrim
              Jun 11 '14 at 20:30












            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            Chatting is generally considered to communicate more ideas quickly. So it is fine to use informal communication as it is generally easy to understand and delivers clear ideas in less words.



            But short hands are not helpful if they are not understandable. I would recommend them to continue using the chatting style they are using. And would like you to point out right when you don't understand. This would let them know that not everyone in group is aware of their shortcuts, hence they need to use more standard version of words.



            Also, with time, you will start understanding their intent.
            Also as this is informal communication, no one would feel offended if someone asks them to elaborate more on the meaning.






            share|improve this answer














            Chatting is generally considered to communicate more ideas quickly. So it is fine to use informal communication as it is generally easy to understand and delivers clear ideas in less words.



            But short hands are not helpful if they are not understandable. I would recommend them to continue using the chatting style they are using. And would like you to point out right when you don't understand. This would let them know that not everyone in group is aware of their shortcuts, hence they need to use more standard version of words.



            Also, with time, you will start understanding their intent.
            Also as this is informal communication, no one would feel offended if someone asks them to elaborate more on the meaning.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jun 2 '14 at 19:44









            CodesInChaos

            11515




            11515










            answered May 31 '14 at 12:08









            Mohit Kanwar

            1217




            1217











            • Thanks. Somebody recommending that you adapt instead of expecting others to conform to your desires. That's quite a departation from today's me, me, me society.
              – Dunk
              Jun 2 '14 at 19:59










            • On the other hand, if the adaption doesn't "take", it can add stress to the job and problems...despite being a little thing...that builds resentment. It's not a me, me, me society thing so much as a "my brain must take time to analyze and process this and I'm too tired to keep doing this every #$%^ time ARGH" stressor. Brain wiring does weird things.
              – Bart Silverstrim
              Jun 11 '14 at 20:30
















            • Thanks. Somebody recommending that you adapt instead of expecting others to conform to your desires. That's quite a departation from today's me, me, me society.
              – Dunk
              Jun 2 '14 at 19:59










            • On the other hand, if the adaption doesn't "take", it can add stress to the job and problems...despite being a little thing...that builds resentment. It's not a me, me, me society thing so much as a "my brain must take time to analyze and process this and I'm too tired to keep doing this every #$%^ time ARGH" stressor. Brain wiring does weird things.
              – Bart Silverstrim
              Jun 11 '14 at 20:30















            Thanks. Somebody recommending that you adapt instead of expecting others to conform to your desires. That's quite a departation from today's me, me, me society.
            – Dunk
            Jun 2 '14 at 19:59




            Thanks. Somebody recommending that you adapt instead of expecting others to conform to your desires. That's quite a departation from today's me, me, me society.
            – Dunk
            Jun 2 '14 at 19:59












            On the other hand, if the adaption doesn't "take", it can add stress to the job and problems...despite being a little thing...that builds resentment. It's not a me, me, me society thing so much as a "my brain must take time to analyze and process this and I'm too tired to keep doing this every #$%^ time ARGH" stressor. Brain wiring does weird things.
            – Bart Silverstrim
            Jun 11 '14 at 20:30




            On the other hand, if the adaption doesn't "take", it can add stress to the job and problems...despite being a little thing...that builds resentment. It's not a me, me, me society thing so much as a "my brain must take time to analyze and process this and I'm too tired to keep doing this every #$%^ time ARGH" stressor. Brain wiring does weird things.
            – Bart Silverstrim
            Jun 11 '14 at 20:30












             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24726%2fco-workers-using-informal-language-for-communication%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

            Confectionery