Mixing
I was fired for refusing to work with Typhoid, do I have any recourse?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I was fired for not showing up to work as ordered. This is after explaining to my boss over the phone that I have Typhoid, and working with food would endanger the guests to the restaurant/arcade at which I work.
Do I have any recourse at all in this situation? As it stands, I should've just went to work anyway. This is a followup to this question: May I legally work in a restaurant with typhoid if the employer knows?
united-states employment texas
asked 7 hours ago
anonymous
324128
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I was fired for not showing up to work as ordered. This is after explaining to my boss over the phone that I have Typhoid, and working with food would endanger the guests to the restaurant/arcade at which I work.
Do I have any recourse at all in this situation? As it stands, I should've just went to work anyway. This is a followup to this question: May I legally work in a restaurant with typhoid if the employer knows?
united-states employment texas
asked 7 hours ago
anonymous
324128
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I was fired for not showing up to work as ordered. This is after explaining to my boss over the phone that I have Typhoid, and working with food would endanger the guests to the restaurant/arcade at which I work.
Do I have any recourse at all in this situation? As it stands, I should've just went to work anyway. This is a followup to this question: May I legally work in a restaurant with typhoid if the employer knows?
united-states employment texas
asked 7 hours ago
anonymous
324128
I was fired for not showing up to work as ordered. This is after explaining to my boss over the phone that I have Typhoid, and working with food would endanger the guests to the restaurant/arcade at which I work.
Do I have any recourse at all in this situation? As it stands, I should've just went to work anyway. This is a followup to this question: May I legally work in a restaurant with typhoid if the employer knows?
united-states employment texas
united-states employment texas
asked 7 hours ago
anonymous
324128
asked 7 hours ago
anonymous
324128
asked 7 hours ago
anonymous
324128
asked 7 hours ago
anonymous
324128
asked 7 hours ago
anonymous
324128
324128
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Read the answers to your previous question. You should not have gone to work anyway. That would have been stupid and irresponsible. You would have endangered the public and would have been liable for being sued and being financially destroyed for the rest of your life.
You need to get treatment; find a community clinic or go to the local ER. Failure to do so will result in you possibly being criminally liable for infecting others in addition to being civilly liable. They will inform the city/county health department and deal with the business that fired you.
After you have started treatment and are not contagious, Google for free legal aid in your area and talk to a lawyer. They will explain if you have a case against the business - this can depend on jurisdiction - to at least get unemployment.
answered 6 hours ago
BlueDogRanch
7,60121232
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Texas is an "at will" employment state; the question is whether there is an exception in case the employer tells you to do something illegal. These guys (trying to drum up business) indicate why it may not be legal to fire you for obeying the law, based on Sabine Pilot Services, Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, where the Texas Supreme Court ruled that an employer cannot force an employee to choose between violating the law and keeping his job. You could then file a wrongful discharge suit, seeking lost and future wages and benefits, court costs, and punitive damages. The outcome you see is not a foregone conclusion. This blog reports a case that depended on Sabine Pilot, namely Peine v. HIT Services L.P., 479 S.W.3d 445. The complication here is that the employee breached a confidentiality agreement, and he remained fired because although he may have been told to break the law, that wasn't the only reason he was fired. From the Sabine ruling:
That narrow exception covers only the discharge of an employee for the
sole reason that the employee refused to perform and illegal act. We
further hold that in the trial of such a case it is the plaintiff's
burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his discharge
was for no reason other than his refusal to perform an illegal act.
Your attorney will tell you what your prospects are for suing the guy: given the alleged action, reinstatement would not be unexpected.
answered 5 hours ago
user6726
50.6k24386
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Read the answers to your previous question. You should not have gone to work anyway. That would have been stupid and irresponsible. You would have endangered the public and would have been liable for being sued and being financially destroyed for the rest of your life.
You need to get treatment; find a community clinic or go to the local ER. Failure to do so will result in you possibly being criminally liable for infecting others in addition to being civilly liable. They will inform the city/county health department and deal with the business that fired you.
After you have started treatment and are not contagious, Google for free legal aid in your area and talk to a lawyer. They will explain if you have a case against the business - this can depend on jurisdiction - to at least get unemployment.
answered 6 hours ago
BlueDogRanch
7,60121232
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Read the answers to your previous question. You should not have gone to work anyway. That would have been stupid and irresponsible. You would have endangered the public and would have been liable for being sued and being financially destroyed for the rest of your life.
You need to get treatment; find a community clinic or go to the local ER. Failure to do so will result in you possibly being criminally liable for infecting others in addition to being civilly liable. They will inform the city/county health department and deal with the business that fired you.
After you have started treatment and are not contagious, Google for free legal aid in your area and talk to a lawyer. They will explain if you have a case against the business - this can depend on jurisdiction - to at least get unemployment.
answered 6 hours ago
BlueDogRanch
7,60121232
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Read the answers to your previous question. You should not have gone to work anyway. That would have been stupid and irresponsible. You would have endangered the public and would have been liable for being sued and being financially destroyed for the rest of your life.
You need to get treatment; find a community clinic or go to the local ER. Failure to do so will result in you possibly being criminally liable for infecting others in addition to being civilly liable. They will inform the city/county health department and deal with the business that fired you.
After you have started treatment and are not contagious, Google for free legal aid in your area and talk to a lawyer. They will explain if you have a case against the business - this can depend on jurisdiction - to at least get unemployment.
answered 6 hours ago
BlueDogRanch
7,60121232
Read the answers to your previous question. You should not have gone to work anyway. That would have been stupid and irresponsible. You would have endangered the public and would have been liable for being sued and being financially destroyed for the rest of your life.
You need to get treatment; find a community clinic or go to the local ER. Failure to do so will result in you possibly being criminally liable for infecting others in addition to being civilly liable. They will inform the city/county health department and deal with the business that fired you.
After you have started treatment and are not contagious, Google for free legal aid in your area and talk to a lawyer. They will explain if you have a case against the business - this can depend on jurisdiction - to at least get unemployment.
answered 6 hours ago
BlueDogRanch
7,60121232
answered 6 hours ago
BlueDogRanch
7,60121232
answered 6 hours ago
BlueDogRanch
7,60121232
answered 6 hours ago
BlueDogRanch
7,60121232
7,60121232
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Texas is an "at will" employment state; the question is whether there is an exception in case the employer tells you to do something illegal. These guys (trying to drum up business) indicate why it may not be legal to fire you for obeying the law, based on Sabine Pilot Services, Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, where the Texas Supreme Court ruled that an employer cannot force an employee to choose between violating the law and keeping his job. You could then file a wrongful discharge suit, seeking lost and future wages and benefits, court costs, and punitive damages. The outcome you see is not a foregone conclusion. This blog reports a case that depended on Sabine Pilot, namely Peine v. HIT Services L.P., 479 S.W.3d 445. The complication here is that the employee breached a confidentiality agreement, and he remained fired because although he may have been told to break the law, that wasn't the only reason he was fired. From the Sabine ruling:
That narrow exception covers only the discharge of an employee for the
sole reason that the employee refused to perform and illegal act. We
further hold that in the trial of such a case it is the plaintiff's
burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his discharge
was for no reason other than his refusal to perform an illegal act.
Your attorney will tell you what your prospects are for suing the guy: given the alleged action, reinstatement would not be unexpected.
answered 5 hours ago
user6726
50.6k24386
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Texas is an "at will" employment state; the question is whether there is an exception in case the employer tells you to do something illegal. These guys (trying to drum up business) indicate why it may not be legal to fire you for obeying the law, based on Sabine Pilot Services, Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, where the Texas Supreme Court ruled that an employer cannot force an employee to choose between violating the law and keeping his job. You could then file a wrongful discharge suit, seeking lost and future wages and benefits, court costs, and punitive damages. The outcome you see is not a foregone conclusion. This blog reports a case that depended on Sabine Pilot, namely Peine v. HIT Services L.P., 479 S.W.3d 445. The complication here is that the employee breached a confidentiality agreement, and he remained fired because although he may have been told to break the law, that wasn't the only reason he was fired. From the Sabine ruling:
That narrow exception covers only the discharge of an employee for the
sole reason that the employee refused to perform and illegal act. We
further hold that in the trial of such a case it is the plaintiff's
burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his discharge
was for no reason other than his refusal to perform an illegal act.
Your attorney will tell you what your prospects are for suing the guy: given the alleged action, reinstatement would not be unexpected.
answered 5 hours ago
user6726
50.6k24386
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Texas is an "at will" employment state; the question is whether there is an exception in case the employer tells you to do something illegal. These guys (trying to drum up business) indicate why it may not be legal to fire you for obeying the law, based on Sabine Pilot Services, Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, where the Texas Supreme Court ruled that an employer cannot force an employee to choose between violating the law and keeping his job. You could then file a wrongful discharge suit, seeking lost and future wages and benefits, court costs, and punitive damages. The outcome you see is not a foregone conclusion. This blog reports a case that depended on Sabine Pilot, namely Peine v. HIT Services L.P., 479 S.W.3d 445. The complication here is that the employee breached a confidentiality agreement, and he remained fired because although he may have been told to break the law, that wasn't the only reason he was fired. From the Sabine ruling:
That narrow exception covers only the discharge of an employee for the
sole reason that the employee refused to perform and illegal act. We
further hold that in the trial of such a case it is the plaintiff's
burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his discharge
was for no reason other than his refusal to perform an illegal act.
Your attorney will tell you what your prospects are for suing the guy: given the alleged action, reinstatement would not be unexpected.
answered 5 hours ago
user6726
50.6k24386
Texas is an "at will" employment state; the question is whether there is an exception in case the employer tells you to do something illegal. These guys (trying to drum up business) indicate why it may not be legal to fire you for obeying the law, based on Sabine Pilot Services, Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, where the Texas Supreme Court ruled that an employer cannot force an employee to choose between violating the law and keeping his job. You could then file a wrongful discharge suit, seeking lost and future wages and benefits, court costs, and punitive damages. The outcome you see is not a foregone conclusion. This blog reports a case that depended on Sabine Pilot, namely Peine v. HIT Services L.P., 479 S.W.3d 445. The complication here is that the employee breached a confidentiality agreement, and he remained fired because although he may have been told to break the law, that wasn't the only reason he was fired. From the Sabine ruling:
That narrow exception covers only the discharge of an employee for the
sole reason that the employee refused to perform and illegal act. We
further hold that in the trial of such a case it is the plaintiff's
burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his discharge
was for no reason other than his refusal to perform an illegal act.
Your attorney will tell you what your prospects are for suing the guy: given the alleged action, reinstatement would not be unexpected.
answered 5 hours ago
user6726
50.6k24386
answered 5 hours ago
user6726
50.6k24386
answered 5 hours ago
user6726
50.6k24386
answered 5 hours ago
user6726
50.6k24386
50.6k24386
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32344%2fi-was-fired-for-refusing-to-work-with-typhoid-do-i-have-any-recourse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password