What should I ask as an applicant in a job interview? [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












At the end of a job interview (at least for mid- or high-level positions), the interviewers usually give a chance for the applicant to ask any question s/he may have for the interviewers.



Does what one asks have a significant effect about the committee judgement?



If yes, what kind of questions are better to be asked?



Are the interviewers waiting to see what is the main point of interest by the applicant to consider?







share|improve this question













We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.





closed as too broad by Jim G., Michael Grubey, Rhys, CincinnatiProgrammer, acolyte Jul 1 '13 at 13:03


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 1




    see workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/11954/…
    – TooTone
    Jun 30 '13 at 13:50
















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












At the end of a job interview (at least for mid- or high-level positions), the interviewers usually give a chance for the applicant to ask any question s/he may have for the interviewers.



Does what one asks have a significant effect about the committee judgement?



If yes, what kind of questions are better to be asked?



Are the interviewers waiting to see what is the main point of interest by the applicant to consider?







share|improve this question













We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.





closed as too broad by Jim G., Michael Grubey, Rhys, CincinnatiProgrammer, acolyte Jul 1 '13 at 13:03


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 1




    see workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/11954/…
    – TooTone
    Jun 30 '13 at 13:50












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





At the end of a job interview (at least for mid- or high-level positions), the interviewers usually give a chance for the applicant to ask any question s/he may have for the interviewers.



Does what one asks have a significant effect about the committee judgement?



If yes, what kind of questions are better to be asked?



Are the interviewers waiting to see what is the main point of interest by the applicant to consider?







share|improve this question














At the end of a job interview (at least for mid- or high-level positions), the interviewers usually give a chance for the applicant to ask any question s/he may have for the interviewers.



Does what one asks have a significant effect about the committee judgement?



If yes, what kind of questions are better to be asked?



Are the interviewers waiting to see what is the main point of interest by the applicant to consider?









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 1 '13 at 12:49









yoozer8

4,10442955




4,10442955










asked Jun 29 '13 at 23:38









Googlebot

160118




160118



We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.




We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.





closed as too broad by Jim G., Michael Grubey, Rhys, CincinnatiProgrammer, acolyte Jul 1 '13 at 13:03


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






closed as too broad by Jim G., Michael Grubey, Rhys, CincinnatiProgrammer, acolyte Jul 1 '13 at 13:03


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    see workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/11954/…
    – TooTone
    Jun 30 '13 at 13:50












  • 1




    see workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/11954/…
    – TooTone
    Jun 30 '13 at 13:50







1




1




see workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/11954/…
– TooTone
Jun 30 '13 at 13:50




see workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/11954/…
– TooTone
Jun 30 '13 at 13:50










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










You 100% should ask questions. What balog pal is saying is not a good idea. The interviewers are not going to try and decide if you are just so smart that you know everything about their company. You NEED to ask questions. It is your turn to interview them. They will be more impressed if you have detailed and specific questions to ask about their company.



Some good questions would be:



What is the work environment like at work?



Why have you stayed here, what keeps you coming back to work here?



Maybe something wasn't clear in the job description so ask about it, What would I be doing in this area? What is a normal day like at work?



DO RESEARCH ON THE COMPANY You guys seemed really involved in _ _ _ _ _ How can I get involved in that? Are you involved in that?



Remember people love to talk about themselves, so ask about them, related to work and geared toward some things that would help you choose the job if you got it.



EDIT: Also a good rule of thumb I go by is to have about 5-7 good questions thought up in my head and ask 3-4 of them. You want to have a few more thought up because it is likely that they are going to answer them already. You also want to stay engaged while asking questions. When they give an answer to your question ask a question that branches off their answer. If you ask a few good questions you will leave the interview just fine. Remember EYE CONTACT AND FIRM HANDSHAKE you want to start off on a good note and end on one as well.






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    3
    down vote














    Does what one asks have a significant effect about the committee
    judgement?




    IMO, If you don't have any questions about the company you are interviewing for then they could take it to mean that you aren't that interested in the company.




    what kind of questions are better to be asked?




    You should ask questions that show you really want to know about the company. This will show that you are intelligent enough to want to learn enough about a company before working there.*



    *EDIT: If you can't come up with any questions because the interviewer has really answered all of them already, you could tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions.






    share|improve this answer






















    • hmm, i'm not sure i agree with the inverse that not having questions shows a lack of intelligence. If the company has provided a comprehensive overview that answers all of your questions before hand then i don't see that as a failure on the interviewee's part, but a huge success on the interviewers part.
      – Rhys
      Jul 1 '13 at 8:35










    • @RhysW in that case, when they ask if you have any questions, tell the interviewer that they've succeeded in already answering your questions. IMO, everybody should go to a job interview with questions otherwise it is obvious that the interviewee is just interested in "a" position and not "the" position.
      – Korey Hinton
      Jul 1 '13 at 12:57










    • "Tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions" I think that part would make a fantastic addition to your answer if you were to edit it in
      – Rhys
      Jul 1 '13 at 14:02










    • I've edited the question accordingly. Thanks RhysW
      – Korey Hinton
      Jul 1 '13 at 14:23










    • oops, ..edited the answer...
      – Korey Hinton
      Jul 1 '13 at 14:37

















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    That part of the interview is not there as another manipulation opportunity. As an applicant you should ask question that you're genuinely interested in and need the information. Especially whatever is relevant to make a decision on accepting an offer. But "just curious" is also a fair game.



    I suggest NOT asking anything just for show.



    A good interviewer will not build any conclusion of that section, as candidates may be well prepared so not need to ask. Or what is usual, just be mentally exhausted at that point. Os just shy or anything.






    share|improve this answer



























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote



      accepted










      You 100% should ask questions. What balog pal is saying is not a good idea. The interviewers are not going to try and decide if you are just so smart that you know everything about their company. You NEED to ask questions. It is your turn to interview them. They will be more impressed if you have detailed and specific questions to ask about their company.



      Some good questions would be:



      What is the work environment like at work?



      Why have you stayed here, what keeps you coming back to work here?



      Maybe something wasn't clear in the job description so ask about it, What would I be doing in this area? What is a normal day like at work?



      DO RESEARCH ON THE COMPANY You guys seemed really involved in _ _ _ _ _ How can I get involved in that? Are you involved in that?



      Remember people love to talk about themselves, so ask about them, related to work and geared toward some things that would help you choose the job if you got it.



      EDIT: Also a good rule of thumb I go by is to have about 5-7 good questions thought up in my head and ask 3-4 of them. You want to have a few more thought up because it is likely that they are going to answer them already. You also want to stay engaged while asking questions. When they give an answer to your question ask a question that branches off their answer. If you ask a few good questions you will leave the interview just fine. Remember EYE CONTACT AND FIRM HANDSHAKE you want to start off on a good note and end on one as well.






      share|improve this answer


























        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted










        You 100% should ask questions. What balog pal is saying is not a good idea. The interviewers are not going to try and decide if you are just so smart that you know everything about their company. You NEED to ask questions. It is your turn to interview them. They will be more impressed if you have detailed and specific questions to ask about their company.



        Some good questions would be:



        What is the work environment like at work?



        Why have you stayed here, what keeps you coming back to work here?



        Maybe something wasn't clear in the job description so ask about it, What would I be doing in this area? What is a normal day like at work?



        DO RESEARCH ON THE COMPANY You guys seemed really involved in _ _ _ _ _ How can I get involved in that? Are you involved in that?



        Remember people love to talk about themselves, so ask about them, related to work and geared toward some things that would help you choose the job if you got it.



        EDIT: Also a good rule of thumb I go by is to have about 5-7 good questions thought up in my head and ask 3-4 of them. You want to have a few more thought up because it is likely that they are going to answer them already. You also want to stay engaged while asking questions. When they give an answer to your question ask a question that branches off their answer. If you ask a few good questions you will leave the interview just fine. Remember EYE CONTACT AND FIRM HANDSHAKE you want to start off on a good note and end on one as well.






        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          You 100% should ask questions. What balog pal is saying is not a good idea. The interviewers are not going to try and decide if you are just so smart that you know everything about their company. You NEED to ask questions. It is your turn to interview them. They will be more impressed if you have detailed and specific questions to ask about their company.



          Some good questions would be:



          What is the work environment like at work?



          Why have you stayed here, what keeps you coming back to work here?



          Maybe something wasn't clear in the job description so ask about it, What would I be doing in this area? What is a normal day like at work?



          DO RESEARCH ON THE COMPANY You guys seemed really involved in _ _ _ _ _ How can I get involved in that? Are you involved in that?



          Remember people love to talk about themselves, so ask about them, related to work and geared toward some things that would help you choose the job if you got it.



          EDIT: Also a good rule of thumb I go by is to have about 5-7 good questions thought up in my head and ask 3-4 of them. You want to have a few more thought up because it is likely that they are going to answer them already. You also want to stay engaged while asking questions. When they give an answer to your question ask a question that branches off their answer. If you ask a few good questions you will leave the interview just fine. Remember EYE CONTACT AND FIRM HANDSHAKE you want to start off on a good note and end on one as well.






          share|improve this answer














          You 100% should ask questions. What balog pal is saying is not a good idea. The interviewers are not going to try and decide if you are just so smart that you know everything about their company. You NEED to ask questions. It is your turn to interview them. They will be more impressed if you have detailed and specific questions to ask about their company.



          Some good questions would be:



          What is the work environment like at work?



          Why have you stayed here, what keeps you coming back to work here?



          Maybe something wasn't clear in the job description so ask about it, What would I be doing in this area? What is a normal day like at work?



          DO RESEARCH ON THE COMPANY You guys seemed really involved in _ _ _ _ _ How can I get involved in that? Are you involved in that?



          Remember people love to talk about themselves, so ask about them, related to work and geared toward some things that would help you choose the job if you got it.



          EDIT: Also a good rule of thumb I go by is to have about 5-7 good questions thought up in my head and ask 3-4 of them. You want to have a few more thought up because it is likely that they are going to answer them already. You also want to stay engaged while asking questions. When they give an answer to your question ask a question that branches off their answer. If you ask a few good questions you will leave the interview just fine. Remember EYE CONTACT AND FIRM HANDSHAKE you want to start off on a good note and end on one as well.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jul 1 '13 at 14:53

























          answered Jul 1 '13 at 12:17









          chh

          1,00497




          1,00497






















              up vote
              3
              down vote














              Does what one asks have a significant effect about the committee
              judgement?




              IMO, If you don't have any questions about the company you are interviewing for then they could take it to mean that you aren't that interested in the company.




              what kind of questions are better to be asked?




              You should ask questions that show you really want to know about the company. This will show that you are intelligent enough to want to learn enough about a company before working there.*



              *EDIT: If you can't come up with any questions because the interviewer has really answered all of them already, you could tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions.






              share|improve this answer






















              • hmm, i'm not sure i agree with the inverse that not having questions shows a lack of intelligence. If the company has provided a comprehensive overview that answers all of your questions before hand then i don't see that as a failure on the interviewee's part, but a huge success on the interviewers part.
                – Rhys
                Jul 1 '13 at 8:35










              • @RhysW in that case, when they ask if you have any questions, tell the interviewer that they've succeeded in already answering your questions. IMO, everybody should go to a job interview with questions otherwise it is obvious that the interviewee is just interested in "a" position and not "the" position.
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 12:57










              • "Tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions" I think that part would make a fantastic addition to your answer if you were to edit it in
                – Rhys
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:02










              • I've edited the question accordingly. Thanks RhysW
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:23










              • oops, ..edited the answer...
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:37














              up vote
              3
              down vote














              Does what one asks have a significant effect about the committee
              judgement?




              IMO, If you don't have any questions about the company you are interviewing for then they could take it to mean that you aren't that interested in the company.




              what kind of questions are better to be asked?




              You should ask questions that show you really want to know about the company. This will show that you are intelligent enough to want to learn enough about a company before working there.*



              *EDIT: If you can't come up with any questions because the interviewer has really answered all of them already, you could tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions.






              share|improve this answer






















              • hmm, i'm not sure i agree with the inverse that not having questions shows a lack of intelligence. If the company has provided a comprehensive overview that answers all of your questions before hand then i don't see that as a failure on the interviewee's part, but a huge success on the interviewers part.
                – Rhys
                Jul 1 '13 at 8:35










              • @RhysW in that case, when they ask if you have any questions, tell the interviewer that they've succeeded in already answering your questions. IMO, everybody should go to a job interview with questions otherwise it is obvious that the interviewee is just interested in "a" position and not "the" position.
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 12:57










              • "Tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions" I think that part would make a fantastic addition to your answer if you were to edit it in
                – Rhys
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:02










              • I've edited the question accordingly. Thanks RhysW
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:23










              • oops, ..edited the answer...
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:37












              up vote
              3
              down vote










              up vote
              3
              down vote










              Does what one asks have a significant effect about the committee
              judgement?




              IMO, If you don't have any questions about the company you are interviewing for then they could take it to mean that you aren't that interested in the company.




              what kind of questions are better to be asked?




              You should ask questions that show you really want to know about the company. This will show that you are intelligent enough to want to learn enough about a company before working there.*



              *EDIT: If you can't come up with any questions because the interviewer has really answered all of them already, you could tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions.






              share|improve this answer















              Does what one asks have a significant effect about the committee
              judgement?




              IMO, If you don't have any questions about the company you are interviewing for then they could take it to mean that you aren't that interested in the company.




              what kind of questions are better to be asked?




              You should ask questions that show you really want to know about the company. This will show that you are intelligent enough to want to learn enough about a company before working there.*



              *EDIT: If you can't come up with any questions because the interviewer has really answered all of them already, you could tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jul 1 '13 at 14:22

























              answered Jun 30 '13 at 1:40









              Korey Hinton

              1516




              1516











              • hmm, i'm not sure i agree with the inverse that not having questions shows a lack of intelligence. If the company has provided a comprehensive overview that answers all of your questions before hand then i don't see that as a failure on the interviewee's part, but a huge success on the interviewers part.
                – Rhys
                Jul 1 '13 at 8:35










              • @RhysW in that case, when they ask if you have any questions, tell the interviewer that they've succeeded in already answering your questions. IMO, everybody should go to a job interview with questions otherwise it is obvious that the interviewee is just interested in "a" position and not "the" position.
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 12:57










              • "Tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions" I think that part would make a fantastic addition to your answer if you were to edit it in
                – Rhys
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:02










              • I've edited the question accordingly. Thanks RhysW
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:23










              • oops, ..edited the answer...
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:37
















              • hmm, i'm not sure i agree with the inverse that not having questions shows a lack of intelligence. If the company has provided a comprehensive overview that answers all of your questions before hand then i don't see that as a failure on the interviewee's part, but a huge success on the interviewers part.
                – Rhys
                Jul 1 '13 at 8:35










              • @RhysW in that case, when they ask if you have any questions, tell the interviewer that they've succeeded in already answering your questions. IMO, everybody should go to a job interview with questions otherwise it is obvious that the interviewee is just interested in "a" position and not "the" position.
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 12:57










              • "Tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions" I think that part would make a fantastic addition to your answer if you were to edit it in
                – Rhys
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:02










              • I've edited the question accordingly. Thanks RhysW
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:23










              • oops, ..edited the answer...
                – Korey Hinton
                Jul 1 '13 at 14:37















              hmm, i'm not sure i agree with the inverse that not having questions shows a lack of intelligence. If the company has provided a comprehensive overview that answers all of your questions before hand then i don't see that as a failure on the interviewee's part, but a huge success on the interviewers part.
              – Rhys
              Jul 1 '13 at 8:35




              hmm, i'm not sure i agree with the inverse that not having questions shows a lack of intelligence. If the company has provided a comprehensive overview that answers all of your questions before hand then i don't see that as a failure on the interviewee's part, but a huge success on the interviewers part.
              – Rhys
              Jul 1 '13 at 8:35












              @RhysW in that case, when they ask if you have any questions, tell the interviewer that they've succeeded in already answering your questions. IMO, everybody should go to a job interview with questions otherwise it is obvious that the interviewee is just interested in "a" position and not "the" position.
              – Korey Hinton
              Jul 1 '13 at 12:57




              @RhysW in that case, when they ask if you have any questions, tell the interviewer that they've succeeded in already answering your questions. IMO, everybody should go to a job interview with questions otherwise it is obvious that the interviewee is just interested in "a" position and not "the" position.
              – Korey Hinton
              Jul 1 '13 at 12:57












              "Tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions" I think that part would make a fantastic addition to your answer if you were to edit it in
              – Rhys
              Jul 1 '13 at 14:02




              "Tell the interviewer they've succeeded in already answering your questions" I think that part would make a fantastic addition to your answer if you were to edit it in
              – Rhys
              Jul 1 '13 at 14:02












              I've edited the question accordingly. Thanks RhysW
              – Korey Hinton
              Jul 1 '13 at 14:23




              I've edited the question accordingly. Thanks RhysW
              – Korey Hinton
              Jul 1 '13 at 14:23












              oops, ..edited the answer...
              – Korey Hinton
              Jul 1 '13 at 14:37




              oops, ..edited the answer...
              – Korey Hinton
              Jul 1 '13 at 14:37










              up vote
              1
              down vote













              That part of the interview is not there as another manipulation opportunity. As an applicant you should ask question that you're genuinely interested in and need the information. Especially whatever is relevant to make a decision on accepting an offer. But "just curious" is also a fair game.



              I suggest NOT asking anything just for show.



              A good interviewer will not build any conclusion of that section, as candidates may be well prepared so not need to ask. Or what is usual, just be mentally exhausted at that point. Os just shy or anything.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                That part of the interview is not there as another manipulation opportunity. As an applicant you should ask question that you're genuinely interested in and need the information. Especially whatever is relevant to make a decision on accepting an offer. But "just curious" is also a fair game.



                I suggest NOT asking anything just for show.



                A good interviewer will not build any conclusion of that section, as candidates may be well prepared so not need to ask. Or what is usual, just be mentally exhausted at that point. Os just shy or anything.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  That part of the interview is not there as another manipulation opportunity. As an applicant you should ask question that you're genuinely interested in and need the information. Especially whatever is relevant to make a decision on accepting an offer. But "just curious" is also a fair game.



                  I suggest NOT asking anything just for show.



                  A good interviewer will not build any conclusion of that section, as candidates may be well prepared so not need to ask. Or what is usual, just be mentally exhausted at that point. Os just shy or anything.






                  share|improve this answer












                  That part of the interview is not there as another manipulation opportunity. As an applicant you should ask question that you're genuinely interested in and need the information. Especially whatever is relevant to make a decision on accepting an offer. But "just curious" is also a fair game.



                  I suggest NOT asking anything just for show.



                  A good interviewer will not build any conclusion of that section, as candidates may be well prepared so not need to ask. Or what is usual, just be mentally exhausted at that point. Os just shy or anything.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jun 30 '13 at 11:19









                  Balog Pal

                  1,327710




                  1,327710












                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What does second last employer means? [closed]

                      List of Gilmore Girls characters

                      Confectionery