Audio recording a live interview [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it ok to use concealed tape recorders at interviews?

    9 answers



I would like to audio record my upcoming in-person interview for several reasons, mostly to review my performance, delivery, and content and also to build a compendium of interview questions (without writing down or recording I cannot memorize questions being asked).



I was wondering if this might repel the interviewers in any way and whether I should do it. There is always a possibility to sit my phone on my binder with discretely started recording but I would rather not hide it.







share|improve this question












marked as duplicate by mhoran_psprep, IDrinkandIKnowThings, CincinnatiProgrammer, jcmeloni, Jim G. Jun 26 '13 at 19:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    I may be more concerned with a reluctance to take written notes. You're not going to be able to walk into every meeting with a recorder.
    – user8365
    Jun 26 '13 at 19:30










  • If your purpose is to improve your interviewing performance, find someone who is prepared to give you a mock interview and record that.
    – DJClayworth
    Jun 26 '13 at 21:01






  • 1




    "Building a compendium of interview questions" is also a reason why interviewers don't want you to record them. If I have a good interview question (which are harder to think up than you might imagine) I don't want it to be well known as a potential question, as that destroys its value.
    – DJClayworth
    Jun 26 '13 at 21:04










  • Memorizing answers to questions tends to be a bad call. It's far better to know what you're talking about and retain the ability to be flexible and accommodate any potential question, especially ones that you don't expect. Best thing you can do is actually take some improv classes.
    – acolyte
    Jun 27 '13 at 13:58










  • Hi amphibient, to avoid questions being closed as duplicates, we first recommend doing a search. If you do post, be sure to indicate why the other questions didn't provide you an answer. This is the best way to avoid duplicate closures. Good luck! :)
    – jmort253♦
    Jun 29 '13 at 2:24

















up vote
1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it ok to use concealed tape recorders at interviews?

    9 answers



I would like to audio record my upcoming in-person interview for several reasons, mostly to review my performance, delivery, and content and also to build a compendium of interview questions (without writing down or recording I cannot memorize questions being asked).



I was wondering if this might repel the interviewers in any way and whether I should do it. There is always a possibility to sit my phone on my binder with discretely started recording but I would rather not hide it.







share|improve this question












marked as duplicate by mhoran_psprep, IDrinkandIKnowThings, CincinnatiProgrammer, jcmeloni, Jim G. Jun 26 '13 at 19:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    I may be more concerned with a reluctance to take written notes. You're not going to be able to walk into every meeting with a recorder.
    – user8365
    Jun 26 '13 at 19:30










  • If your purpose is to improve your interviewing performance, find someone who is prepared to give you a mock interview and record that.
    – DJClayworth
    Jun 26 '13 at 21:01






  • 1




    "Building a compendium of interview questions" is also a reason why interviewers don't want you to record them. If I have a good interview question (which are harder to think up than you might imagine) I don't want it to be well known as a potential question, as that destroys its value.
    – DJClayworth
    Jun 26 '13 at 21:04










  • Memorizing answers to questions tends to be a bad call. It's far better to know what you're talking about and retain the ability to be flexible and accommodate any potential question, especially ones that you don't expect. Best thing you can do is actually take some improv classes.
    – acolyte
    Jun 27 '13 at 13:58










  • Hi amphibient, to avoid questions being closed as duplicates, we first recommend doing a search. If you do post, be sure to indicate why the other questions didn't provide you an answer. This is the best way to avoid duplicate closures. Good luck! :)
    – jmort253♦
    Jun 29 '13 at 2:24













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it ok to use concealed tape recorders at interviews?

    9 answers



I would like to audio record my upcoming in-person interview for several reasons, mostly to review my performance, delivery, and content and also to build a compendium of interview questions (without writing down or recording I cannot memorize questions being asked).



I was wondering if this might repel the interviewers in any way and whether I should do it. There is always a possibility to sit my phone on my binder with discretely started recording but I would rather not hide it.







share|improve this question













This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it ok to use concealed tape recorders at interviews?

    9 answers



I would like to audio record my upcoming in-person interview for several reasons, mostly to review my performance, delivery, and content and also to build a compendium of interview questions (without writing down or recording I cannot memorize questions being asked).



I was wondering if this might repel the interviewers in any way and whether I should do it. There is always a possibility to sit my phone on my binder with discretely started recording but I would rather not hide it.





This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it ok to use concealed tape recorders at interviews?

    9 answers









share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jun 26 '13 at 18:03









amphibient

3,20772441




3,20772441




marked as duplicate by mhoran_psprep, IDrinkandIKnowThings, CincinnatiProgrammer, jcmeloni, Jim G. Jun 26 '13 at 19:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by mhoran_psprep, IDrinkandIKnowThings, CincinnatiProgrammer, jcmeloni, Jim G. Jun 26 '13 at 19:21


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 1




    I may be more concerned with a reluctance to take written notes. You're not going to be able to walk into every meeting with a recorder.
    – user8365
    Jun 26 '13 at 19:30










  • If your purpose is to improve your interviewing performance, find someone who is prepared to give you a mock interview and record that.
    – DJClayworth
    Jun 26 '13 at 21:01






  • 1




    "Building a compendium of interview questions" is also a reason why interviewers don't want you to record them. If I have a good interview question (which are harder to think up than you might imagine) I don't want it to be well known as a potential question, as that destroys its value.
    – DJClayworth
    Jun 26 '13 at 21:04










  • Memorizing answers to questions tends to be a bad call. It's far better to know what you're talking about and retain the ability to be flexible and accommodate any potential question, especially ones that you don't expect. Best thing you can do is actually take some improv classes.
    – acolyte
    Jun 27 '13 at 13:58










  • Hi amphibient, to avoid questions being closed as duplicates, we first recommend doing a search. If you do post, be sure to indicate why the other questions didn't provide you an answer. This is the best way to avoid duplicate closures. Good luck! :)
    – jmort253♦
    Jun 29 '13 at 2:24













  • 1




    I may be more concerned with a reluctance to take written notes. You're not going to be able to walk into every meeting with a recorder.
    – user8365
    Jun 26 '13 at 19:30










  • If your purpose is to improve your interviewing performance, find someone who is prepared to give you a mock interview and record that.
    – DJClayworth
    Jun 26 '13 at 21:01






  • 1




    "Building a compendium of interview questions" is also a reason why interviewers don't want you to record them. If I have a good interview question (which are harder to think up than you might imagine) I don't want it to be well known as a potential question, as that destroys its value.
    – DJClayworth
    Jun 26 '13 at 21:04










  • Memorizing answers to questions tends to be a bad call. It's far better to know what you're talking about and retain the ability to be flexible and accommodate any potential question, especially ones that you don't expect. Best thing you can do is actually take some improv classes.
    – acolyte
    Jun 27 '13 at 13:58










  • Hi amphibient, to avoid questions being closed as duplicates, we first recommend doing a search. If you do post, be sure to indicate why the other questions didn't provide you an answer. This is the best way to avoid duplicate closures. Good luck! :)
    – jmort253♦
    Jun 29 '13 at 2:24








1




1




I may be more concerned with a reluctance to take written notes. You're not going to be able to walk into every meeting with a recorder.
– user8365
Jun 26 '13 at 19:30




I may be more concerned with a reluctance to take written notes. You're not going to be able to walk into every meeting with a recorder.
– user8365
Jun 26 '13 at 19:30












If your purpose is to improve your interviewing performance, find someone who is prepared to give you a mock interview and record that.
– DJClayworth
Jun 26 '13 at 21:01




If your purpose is to improve your interviewing performance, find someone who is prepared to give you a mock interview and record that.
– DJClayworth
Jun 26 '13 at 21:01




1




1




"Building a compendium of interview questions" is also a reason why interviewers don't want you to record them. If I have a good interview question (which are harder to think up than you might imagine) I don't want it to be well known as a potential question, as that destroys its value.
– DJClayworth
Jun 26 '13 at 21:04




"Building a compendium of interview questions" is also a reason why interviewers don't want you to record them. If I have a good interview question (which are harder to think up than you might imagine) I don't want it to be well known as a potential question, as that destroys its value.
– DJClayworth
Jun 26 '13 at 21:04












Memorizing answers to questions tends to be a bad call. It's far better to know what you're talking about and retain the ability to be flexible and accommodate any potential question, especially ones that you don't expect. Best thing you can do is actually take some improv classes.
– acolyte
Jun 27 '13 at 13:58




Memorizing answers to questions tends to be a bad call. It's far better to know what you're talking about and retain the ability to be flexible and accommodate any potential question, especially ones that you don't expect. Best thing you can do is actually take some improv classes.
– acolyte
Jun 27 '13 at 13:58












Hi amphibient, to avoid questions being closed as duplicates, we first recommend doing a search. If you do post, be sure to indicate why the other questions didn't provide you an answer. This is the best way to avoid duplicate closures. Good luck! :)
– jmort253♦
Jun 29 '13 at 2:24





Hi amphibient, to avoid questions being closed as duplicates, we first recommend doing a search. If you do post, be sure to indicate why the other questions didn't provide you an answer. This is the best way to avoid duplicate closures. Good luck! :)
– jmort253♦
Jun 29 '13 at 2:24











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote



accepted










In terms of how employers are likely to react, not how they should react the reality is that I think it would make most employers very uncomfortable. They would feel like this as they would worry the intent was adversarial in some way such as the candidate thought they might do something illegal and wanted to capture that on tape or simply use the the presence of the tape recorder to deter it, or use the recording later to say you said the job would include some things but not others if you were to be hired.



While there could be a innocent motivation to ask to record it’s so outside the normal range of interview behaviour that asking it would be close to announcing, I'm litigious or high maintenance. Even though the majority of employers have no intention of screwing you over legally or otherwise, they’d still worry about this. Because no one wants to hire an adversarial, litigious or high-maintenance employee.






share|improve this answer




















  • It's a little unfortunate, given @amphibient's inoffensive reasons, but I think you're entirely correct that most employers would take it poorly. I fear that I would, certainly.
    – Carson63000
    Jun 27 '13 at 1:15

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
6
down vote



accepted










In terms of how employers are likely to react, not how they should react the reality is that I think it would make most employers very uncomfortable. They would feel like this as they would worry the intent was adversarial in some way such as the candidate thought they might do something illegal and wanted to capture that on tape or simply use the the presence of the tape recorder to deter it, or use the recording later to say you said the job would include some things but not others if you were to be hired.



While there could be a innocent motivation to ask to record it’s so outside the normal range of interview behaviour that asking it would be close to announcing, I'm litigious or high maintenance. Even though the majority of employers have no intention of screwing you over legally or otherwise, they’d still worry about this. Because no one wants to hire an adversarial, litigious or high-maintenance employee.






share|improve this answer




















  • It's a little unfortunate, given @amphibient's inoffensive reasons, but I think you're entirely correct that most employers would take it poorly. I fear that I would, certainly.
    – Carson63000
    Jun 27 '13 at 1:15














up vote
6
down vote



accepted










In terms of how employers are likely to react, not how they should react the reality is that I think it would make most employers very uncomfortable. They would feel like this as they would worry the intent was adversarial in some way such as the candidate thought they might do something illegal and wanted to capture that on tape or simply use the the presence of the tape recorder to deter it, or use the recording later to say you said the job would include some things but not others if you were to be hired.



While there could be a innocent motivation to ask to record it’s so outside the normal range of interview behaviour that asking it would be close to announcing, I'm litigious or high maintenance. Even though the majority of employers have no intention of screwing you over legally or otherwise, they’d still worry about this. Because no one wants to hire an adversarial, litigious or high-maintenance employee.






share|improve this answer




















  • It's a little unfortunate, given @amphibient's inoffensive reasons, but I think you're entirely correct that most employers would take it poorly. I fear that I would, certainly.
    – Carson63000
    Jun 27 '13 at 1:15












up vote
6
down vote



accepted







up vote
6
down vote



accepted






In terms of how employers are likely to react, not how they should react the reality is that I think it would make most employers very uncomfortable. They would feel like this as they would worry the intent was adversarial in some way such as the candidate thought they might do something illegal and wanted to capture that on tape or simply use the the presence of the tape recorder to deter it, or use the recording later to say you said the job would include some things but not others if you were to be hired.



While there could be a innocent motivation to ask to record it’s so outside the normal range of interview behaviour that asking it would be close to announcing, I'm litigious or high maintenance. Even though the majority of employers have no intention of screwing you over legally or otherwise, they’d still worry about this. Because no one wants to hire an adversarial, litigious or high-maintenance employee.






share|improve this answer












In terms of how employers are likely to react, not how they should react the reality is that I think it would make most employers very uncomfortable. They would feel like this as they would worry the intent was adversarial in some way such as the candidate thought they might do something illegal and wanted to capture that on tape or simply use the the presence of the tape recorder to deter it, or use the recording later to say you said the job would include some things but not others if you were to be hired.



While there could be a innocent motivation to ask to record it’s so outside the normal range of interview behaviour that asking it would be close to announcing, I'm litigious or high maintenance. Even though the majority of employers have no intention of screwing you over legally or otherwise, they’d still worry about this. Because no one wants to hire an adversarial, litigious or high-maintenance employee.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jun 26 '13 at 18:17









Michael Grubey

4,20432252




4,20432252











  • It's a little unfortunate, given @amphibient's inoffensive reasons, but I think you're entirely correct that most employers would take it poorly. I fear that I would, certainly.
    – Carson63000
    Jun 27 '13 at 1:15
















  • It's a little unfortunate, given @amphibient's inoffensive reasons, but I think you're entirely correct that most employers would take it poorly. I fear that I would, certainly.
    – Carson63000
    Jun 27 '13 at 1:15















It's a little unfortunate, given @amphibient's inoffensive reasons, but I think you're entirely correct that most employers would take it poorly. I fear that I would, certainly.
– Carson63000
Jun 27 '13 at 1:15




It's a little unfortunate, given @amphibient's inoffensive reasons, but I think you're entirely correct that most employers would take it poorly. I fear that I would, certainly.
– Carson63000
Jun 27 '13 at 1:15


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery