Mixing
Severing the relationship with a recruiter
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
On the heels of the double-presentation question, I'm curious about the best way to sever ties with a recruiter who has represented me in the past.
Let's say I was presented by this recruiter to a firm in January, but in the interim, have decided that I no longer wish for that recruiter to represent me. In addition, what if the aforementioned firm has a job opening in August that may be a fit?
Am I free to apply on my own? How do I need to communicate to the recruiter that the relationship is over? What implications are there for a conflict at the potential employer?
I have no contractual obligation to the recruiter, none of any kind. They've just presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
recruitment relationships
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
asked Jul 9 '12 at 23:51
ewwhite
1,48711017
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
On the heels of the double-presentation question, I'm curious about the best way to sever ties with a recruiter who has represented me in the past.
Let's say I was presented by this recruiter to a firm in January, but in the interim, have decided that I no longer wish for that recruiter to represent me. In addition, what if the aforementioned firm has a job opening in August that may be a fit?
Am I free to apply on my own? How do I need to communicate to the recruiter that the relationship is over? What implications are there for a conflict at the potential employer?
I have no contractual obligation to the recruiter, none of any kind. They've just presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
recruitment relationships
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
asked Jul 9 '12 at 23:51
ewwhite
1,48711017
2
Do you have any sort of contractual obligation to the recruiter?
– jcmeloni
Jul 9 '12 at 23:58
1
None. Other than they've presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
– ewwhite
Jul 10 '12 at 0:01
1
Thanks for clarifying; @MathAttack's answer pretty well covers what I would say in this situation!
– jcmeloni
Jul 10 '12 at 10:44
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
On the heels of the double-presentation question, I'm curious about the best way to sever ties with a recruiter who has represented me in the past.
Let's say I was presented by this recruiter to a firm in January, but in the interim, have decided that I no longer wish for that recruiter to represent me. In addition, what if the aforementioned firm has a job opening in August that may be a fit?
Am I free to apply on my own? How do I need to communicate to the recruiter that the relationship is over? What implications are there for a conflict at the potential employer?
I have no contractual obligation to the recruiter, none of any kind. They've just presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
recruitment relationships
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
asked Jul 9 '12 at 23:51
ewwhite
1,48711017
On the heels of the double-presentation question, I'm curious about the best way to sever ties with a recruiter who has represented me in the past.
Let's say I was presented by this recruiter to a firm in January, but in the interim, have decided that I no longer wish for that recruiter to represent me. In addition, what if the aforementioned firm has a job opening in August that may be a fit?
Am I free to apply on my own? How do I need to communicate to the recruiter that the relationship is over? What implications are there for a conflict at the potential employer?
I have no contractual obligation to the recruiter, none of any kind. They've just presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
recruitment relationships
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
asked Jul 9 '12 at 23:51
ewwhite
1,48711017
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48
Community♦
1
1
asked Jul 9 '12 at 23:51
ewwhite
1,48711017
asked Jul 9 '12 at 23:51
ewwhite
1,48711017
asked Jul 9 '12 at 23:51
ewwhite
1,48711017
1,48711017
2
Do you have any sort of contractual obligation to the recruiter?
– jcmeloni
Jul 9 '12 at 23:58
1
None. Other than they've presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
– ewwhite
Jul 10 '12 at 0:01
1
Thanks for clarifying; @MathAttack's answer pretty well covers what I would say in this situation!
– jcmeloni
Jul 10 '12 at 10:44
add a comment |Â
2
Do you have any sort of contractual obligation to the recruiter?
– jcmeloni
Jul 9 '12 at 23:58
1
None. Other than they've presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
– ewwhite
Jul 10 '12 at 0:01
1
Thanks for clarifying; @MathAttack's answer pretty well covers what I would say in this situation!
– jcmeloni
Jul 10 '12 at 10:44
2
2
Do you have any sort of contractual obligation to the recruiter?
– jcmeloni
Jul 9 '12 at 23:58
Do you have any sort of contractual obligation to the recruiter?
– jcmeloni
Jul 9 '12 at 23:58
1
1
None. Other than they've presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
– ewwhite
Jul 10 '12 at 0:01
None. Other than they've presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
– ewwhite
Jul 10 '12 at 0:01
1
1
Thanks for clarifying; @MathAttack's answer pretty well covers what I would say in this situation!
– jcmeloni
Jul 10 '12 at 10:44
Thanks for clarifying; @MathAttack's answer pretty well covers what I would say in this situation!
– jcmeloni
Jul 10 '12 at 10:44
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
Just say, "I'm no longer in the job market, and don't want my resume in circulation. Please contact me in advance before presenting me to anyone." Every time they ask you if they can send your resume to someone, before they share the name, politely say, "I'm sorry, but I'm not interested." Eventually they'll get the idea.
It is unethical to apply directly to a firm if the headhunter makes the introduction. If they give you a position or a firm that you are already aware of, you can say, "Thank you for the intro, but I already know of them"
I think the industry standard is not to chase the same firm for a year, but I'm not positive on this one. If it's a different job in a different department, and you're not using any connections they gave you, less could be ok. You can always tell the HR rep at the company, "I heard about you from X 7 months ago. I'm no longer working with that firm...." and then it puts this on their head.
The bottom line is that headhunters don't have much recourse when you go around them, but it's still poor form to violate the unspoken rules. At some point in your future one of them could be helpful.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 0:59
MathAttack
2,3061220
1
It is not just unethical there may be remuneration required should you take a job with a firm that you were presented to through the recruiter. These can be very significant to an individual. Not to mention attorney fees for both sides if they choose to pursue the matter in court.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 13:08
1
@Chad: that will depend greatly on whether the OP signed any contract with the recruiter.
– kevin cline
Jul 10 '12 at 15:47
1
@kevincline - you might be surprised to find out that you do not even need to have signed anything in some places. Simply agreeing to utilize the offered services of the agency can act as binding consent. This is not true everywhere and in every situation. Which is why I used the word MAY above.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 15:53
A side note - it's very rare for headhunters to actually sue people unless it's very flagrant. Why tick off potential employers? It's still bad form to go around them though. (Sort of like a higher cost version of not tipping a waiter who gives you good service.)
– MathAttack
Jul 10 '12 at 16:09
@MathAttack - One can go around them. But one needs good reason too. If it's been years since the recruiter has introduced you, then I would not worry about it.
– bigdaveyl
May 6 '13 at 19:11
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
Just give the recruiter written notice that you are withdrawing permissions to discuss you with any outside agency, company, or person. That will free you to pursue jobs on your own or with other recruiters.
If a recruiter ever represented you to a company, and at some point in the future you are offered a job by that same company, then you want to be sure to mention to the hiring company that you were at one time in the past referred to the hiring company by a recruiter.
You may well be opening up your new employer to a lawsuit if you don't disclose your prior relationship with the recruiter in question.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 4:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
Very sound advice. Thank you.
– ewwhite
Sep 27 '13 at 22:50
I would add to send it both via email and certified mail (or the equivalent outside the US).
– daaxix
Aug 9 '14 at 4:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
If the job is a different one and you are applying from scratch, you have no legal obligation.
However, if you think your chances will be enhanced by them having met and maybe tested you already via the recuiter, then ethically you should at least contact the recruiter.
Also, it may well pay off later. Often recruiters are allied to companies and it might look pretty bad if he stops by the company after you are hired.
edited Jul 10 '12 at 15:00
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Jul 10 '12 at 2:08
Michael Durrant
9,68122856
1
It' not so much a question of the employee 'looking bad' in the eyes of the recruiter. It's that the recruiter may well claim via lawsuit that the hiring company violated the written contract with the recruiter.
– Jim In Texas
Jul 10 '12 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Had the headhunter not made any preliminary agreement with you, even as lightweight as an email?
I have recently decided to take back more control on when/which employers get to receive my CV, so I re-read the emails I exchanged last year with a headhunter. In his 1st email there were some conditions, which I naively accepted, implying in vague language that he could send my CV to other potential employers besides the original one, with no expiration date.
So I emailed him to withdraw from the agreement, as @Jim In Texas advised.
Further to that, whenever I work with headhunters in the future, I plan to put in an email right from the start that they have to get my consent before proposing me for each single job opportunity. They earn big fees when they place someone, so I figure they will still propose me if they really believe my profile matches, while giving me more control on my job search.
answered Aug 8 '14 at 12:15
lifExplorer
857
add a comment |Â
StackExchange.ready(function ()
$("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
var showEditor = function()
$("#show-editor-button").hide();
$("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
;
var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
if(useFancy == 'True')
var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');
$(this).loadPopup(
url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
loaded: function(popup)
var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');
pTitle.text(popupTitle);
pBody.html(popupBody);
pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);
)
else
var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
showEditor();
);
);
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
Just say, "I'm no longer in the job market, and don't want my resume in circulation. Please contact me in advance before presenting me to anyone." Every time they ask you if they can send your resume to someone, before they share the name, politely say, "I'm sorry, but I'm not interested." Eventually they'll get the idea.
It is unethical to apply directly to a firm if the headhunter makes the introduction. If they give you a position or a firm that you are already aware of, you can say, "Thank you for the intro, but I already know of them"
I think the industry standard is not to chase the same firm for a year, but I'm not positive on this one. If it's a different job in a different department, and you're not using any connections they gave you, less could be ok. You can always tell the HR rep at the company, "I heard about you from X 7 months ago. I'm no longer working with that firm...." and then it puts this on their head.
The bottom line is that headhunters don't have much recourse when you go around them, but it's still poor form to violate the unspoken rules. At some point in your future one of them could be helpful.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 0:59
MathAttack
2,3061220
1
It is not just unethical there may be remuneration required should you take a job with a firm that you were presented to through the recruiter. These can be very significant to an individual. Not to mention attorney fees for both sides if they choose to pursue the matter in court.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 13:08
1
@Chad: that will depend greatly on whether the OP signed any contract with the recruiter.
– kevin cline
Jul 10 '12 at 15:47
1
@kevincline - you might be surprised to find out that you do not even need to have signed anything in some places. Simply agreeing to utilize the offered services of the agency can act as binding consent. This is not true everywhere and in every situation. Which is why I used the word MAY above.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 15:53
A side note - it's very rare for headhunters to actually sue people unless it's very flagrant. Why tick off potential employers? It's still bad form to go around them though. (Sort of like a higher cost version of not tipping a waiter who gives you good service.)
– MathAttack
Jul 10 '12 at 16:09
@MathAttack - One can go around them. But one needs good reason too. If it's been years since the recruiter has introduced you, then I would not worry about it.
– bigdaveyl
May 6 '13 at 19:11
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
Just say, "I'm no longer in the job market, and don't want my resume in circulation. Please contact me in advance before presenting me to anyone." Every time they ask you if they can send your resume to someone, before they share the name, politely say, "I'm sorry, but I'm not interested." Eventually they'll get the idea.
It is unethical to apply directly to a firm if the headhunter makes the introduction. If they give you a position or a firm that you are already aware of, you can say, "Thank you for the intro, but I already know of them"
I think the industry standard is not to chase the same firm for a year, but I'm not positive on this one. If it's a different job in a different department, and you're not using any connections they gave you, less could be ok. You can always tell the HR rep at the company, "I heard about you from X 7 months ago. I'm no longer working with that firm...." and then it puts this on their head.
The bottom line is that headhunters don't have much recourse when you go around them, but it's still poor form to violate the unspoken rules. At some point in your future one of them could be helpful.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 0:59
MathAttack
2,3061220
1
It is not just unethical there may be remuneration required should you take a job with a firm that you were presented to through the recruiter. These can be very significant to an individual. Not to mention attorney fees for both sides if they choose to pursue the matter in court.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 13:08
1
@Chad: that will depend greatly on whether the OP signed any contract with the recruiter.
– kevin cline
Jul 10 '12 at 15:47
1
@kevincline - you might be surprised to find out that you do not even need to have signed anything in some places. Simply agreeing to utilize the offered services of the agency can act as binding consent. This is not true everywhere and in every situation. Which is why I used the word MAY above.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 15:53
A side note - it's very rare for headhunters to actually sue people unless it's very flagrant. Why tick off potential employers? It's still bad form to go around them though. (Sort of like a higher cost version of not tipping a waiter who gives you good service.)
– MathAttack
Jul 10 '12 at 16:09
@MathAttack - One can go around them. But one needs good reason too. If it's been years since the recruiter has introduced you, then I would not worry about it.
– bigdaveyl
May 6 '13 at 19:11
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
Just say, "I'm no longer in the job market, and don't want my resume in circulation. Please contact me in advance before presenting me to anyone." Every time they ask you if they can send your resume to someone, before they share the name, politely say, "I'm sorry, but I'm not interested." Eventually they'll get the idea.
It is unethical to apply directly to a firm if the headhunter makes the introduction. If they give you a position or a firm that you are already aware of, you can say, "Thank you for the intro, but I already know of them"
I think the industry standard is not to chase the same firm for a year, but I'm not positive on this one. If it's a different job in a different department, and you're not using any connections they gave you, less could be ok. You can always tell the HR rep at the company, "I heard about you from X 7 months ago. I'm no longer working with that firm...." and then it puts this on their head.
The bottom line is that headhunters don't have much recourse when you go around them, but it's still poor form to violate the unspoken rules. At some point in your future one of them could be helpful.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 0:59
MathAttack
2,3061220
Just say, "I'm no longer in the job market, and don't want my resume in circulation. Please contact me in advance before presenting me to anyone." Every time they ask you if they can send your resume to someone, before they share the name, politely say, "I'm sorry, but I'm not interested." Eventually they'll get the idea.
It is unethical to apply directly to a firm if the headhunter makes the introduction. If they give you a position or a firm that you are already aware of, you can say, "Thank you for the intro, but I already know of them"
I think the industry standard is not to chase the same firm for a year, but I'm not positive on this one. If it's a different job in a different department, and you're not using any connections they gave you, less could be ok. You can always tell the HR rep at the company, "I heard about you from X 7 months ago. I'm no longer working with that firm...." and then it puts this on their head.
The bottom line is that headhunters don't have much recourse when you go around them, but it's still poor form to violate the unspoken rules. At some point in your future one of them could be helpful.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 0:59
MathAttack
2,3061220
answered Jul 10 '12 at 0:59
MathAttack
2,3061220
answered Jul 10 '12 at 0:59
MathAttack
2,3061220
answered Jul 10 '12 at 0:59
MathAttack
2,3061220
2,3061220
1
It is not just unethical there may be remuneration required should you take a job with a firm that you were presented to through the recruiter. These can be very significant to an individual. Not to mention attorney fees for both sides if they choose to pursue the matter in court.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 13:08
1
@Chad: that will depend greatly on whether the OP signed any contract with the recruiter.
– kevin cline
Jul 10 '12 at 15:47
1
@kevincline - you might be surprised to find out that you do not even need to have signed anything in some places. Simply agreeing to utilize the offered services of the agency can act as binding consent. This is not true everywhere and in every situation. Which is why I used the word MAY above.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 15:53
A side note - it's very rare for headhunters to actually sue people unless it's very flagrant. Why tick off potential employers? It's still bad form to go around them though. (Sort of like a higher cost version of not tipping a waiter who gives you good service.)
– MathAttack
Jul 10 '12 at 16:09
@MathAttack - One can go around them. But one needs good reason too. If it's been years since the recruiter has introduced you, then I would not worry about it.
– bigdaveyl
May 6 '13 at 19:11
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1
It is not just unethical there may be remuneration required should you take a job with a firm that you were presented to through the recruiter. These can be very significant to an individual. Not to mention attorney fees for both sides if they choose to pursue the matter in court.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 13:08
1
@Chad: that will depend greatly on whether the OP signed any contract with the recruiter.
– kevin cline
Jul 10 '12 at 15:47
1
@kevincline - you might be surprised to find out that you do not even need to have signed anything in some places. Simply agreeing to utilize the offered services of the agency can act as binding consent. This is not true everywhere and in every situation. Which is why I used the word MAY above.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 15:53
A side note - it's very rare for headhunters to actually sue people unless it's very flagrant. Why tick off potential employers? It's still bad form to go around them though. (Sort of like a higher cost version of not tipping a waiter who gives you good service.)
– MathAttack
Jul 10 '12 at 16:09
@MathAttack - One can go around them. But one needs good reason too. If it's been years since the recruiter has introduced you, then I would not worry about it.
– bigdaveyl
May 6 '13 at 19:11
1
1
It is not just unethical there may be remuneration required should you take a job with a firm that you were presented to through the recruiter. These can be very significant to an individual. Not to mention attorney fees for both sides if they choose to pursue the matter in court.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 13:08
It is not just unethical there may be remuneration required should you take a job with a firm that you were presented to through the recruiter. These can be very significant to an individual. Not to mention attorney fees for both sides if they choose to pursue the matter in court.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 13:08
1
1
@Chad: that will depend greatly on whether the OP signed any contract with the recruiter.
– kevin cline
Jul 10 '12 at 15:47
@Chad: that will depend greatly on whether the OP signed any contract with the recruiter.
– kevin cline
Jul 10 '12 at 15:47
1
1
@kevincline - you might be surprised to find out that you do not even need to have signed anything in some places. Simply agreeing to utilize the offered services of the agency can act as binding consent. This is not true everywhere and in every situation. Which is why I used the word MAY above.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 15:53
@kevincline - you might be surprised to find out that you do not even need to have signed anything in some places. Simply agreeing to utilize the offered services of the agency can act as binding consent. This is not true everywhere and in every situation. Which is why I used the word MAY above.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
Jul 10 '12 at 15:53
A side note - it's very rare for headhunters to actually sue people unless it's very flagrant. Why tick off potential employers? It's still bad form to go around them though. (Sort of like a higher cost version of not tipping a waiter who gives you good service.)
– MathAttack
Jul 10 '12 at 16:09
A side note - it's very rare for headhunters to actually sue people unless it's very flagrant. Why tick off potential employers? It's still bad form to go around them though. (Sort of like a higher cost version of not tipping a waiter who gives you good service.)
– MathAttack
Jul 10 '12 at 16:09
@MathAttack - One can go around them. But one needs good reason too. If it's been years since the recruiter has introduced you, then I would not worry about it.
– bigdaveyl
May 6 '13 at 19:11
@MathAttack - One can go around them. But one needs good reason too. If it's been years since the recruiter has introduced you, then I would not worry about it.
– bigdaveyl
May 6 '13 at 19:11
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
7
down vote
Just give the recruiter written notice that you are withdrawing permissions to discuss you with any outside agency, company, or person. That will free you to pursue jobs on your own or with other recruiters.
If a recruiter ever represented you to a company, and at some point in the future you are offered a job by that same company, then you want to be sure to mention to the hiring company that you were at one time in the past referred to the hiring company by a recruiter.
You may well be opening up your new employer to a lawsuit if you don't disclose your prior relationship with the recruiter in question.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 4:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
Very sound advice. Thank you.
– ewwhite
Sep 27 '13 at 22:50
I would add to send it both via email and certified mail (or the equivalent outside the US).
– daaxix
Aug 9 '14 at 4:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
Just give the recruiter written notice that you are withdrawing permissions to discuss you with any outside agency, company, or person. That will free you to pursue jobs on your own or with other recruiters.
If a recruiter ever represented you to a company, and at some point in the future you are offered a job by that same company, then you want to be sure to mention to the hiring company that you were at one time in the past referred to the hiring company by a recruiter.
You may well be opening up your new employer to a lawsuit if you don't disclose your prior relationship with the recruiter in question.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 4:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
Very sound advice. Thank you.
– ewwhite
Sep 27 '13 at 22:50
I would add to send it both via email and certified mail (or the equivalent outside the US).
– daaxix
Aug 9 '14 at 4:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Just give the recruiter written notice that you are withdrawing permissions to discuss you with any outside agency, company, or person. That will free you to pursue jobs on your own or with other recruiters.
If a recruiter ever represented you to a company, and at some point in the future you are offered a job by that same company, then you want to be sure to mention to the hiring company that you were at one time in the past referred to the hiring company by a recruiter.
You may well be opening up your new employer to a lawsuit if you don't disclose your prior relationship with the recruiter in question.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 4:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
Just give the recruiter written notice that you are withdrawing permissions to discuss you with any outside agency, company, or person. That will free you to pursue jobs on your own or with other recruiters.
If a recruiter ever represented you to a company, and at some point in the future you are offered a job by that same company, then you want to be sure to mention to the hiring company that you were at one time in the past referred to the hiring company by a recruiter.
You may well be opening up your new employer to a lawsuit if you don't disclose your prior relationship with the recruiter in question.
answered Jul 10 '12 at 4:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
answered Jul 10 '12 at 4:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
answered Jul 10 '12 at 4:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
answered Jul 10 '12 at 4:54
Jim In Texas
3,9851222
3,9851222
Very sound advice. Thank you.
– ewwhite
Sep 27 '13 at 22:50
I would add to send it both via email and certified mail (or the equivalent outside the US).
– daaxix
Aug 9 '14 at 4:17
add a comment |Â
Very sound advice. Thank you.
– ewwhite
Sep 27 '13 at 22:50
I would add to send it both via email and certified mail (or the equivalent outside the US).
– daaxix
Aug 9 '14 at 4:17
Very sound advice. Thank you.
– ewwhite
Sep 27 '13 at 22:50
Very sound advice. Thank you.
– ewwhite
Sep 27 '13 at 22:50
I would add to send it both via email and certified mail (or the equivalent outside the US).
– daaxix
Aug 9 '14 at 4:17
I would add to send it both via email and certified mail (or the equivalent outside the US).
– daaxix
Aug 9 '14 at 4:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
If the job is a different one and you are applying from scratch, you have no legal obligation.
However, if you think your chances will be enhanced by them having met and maybe tested you already via the recuiter, then ethically you should at least contact the recruiter.
Also, it may well pay off later. Often recruiters are allied to companies and it might look pretty bad if he stops by the company after you are hired.
edited Jul 10 '12 at 15:00
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Jul 10 '12 at 2:08
Michael Durrant
9,68122856
1
It' not so much a question of the employee 'looking bad' in the eyes of the recruiter. It's that the recruiter may well claim via lawsuit that the hiring company violated the written contract with the recruiter.
– Jim In Texas
Jul 10 '12 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
If the job is a different one and you are applying from scratch, you have no legal obligation.
However, if you think your chances will be enhanced by them having met and maybe tested you already via the recuiter, then ethically you should at least contact the recruiter.
Also, it may well pay off later. Often recruiters are allied to companies and it might look pretty bad if he stops by the company after you are hired.
edited Jul 10 '12 at 15:00
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Jul 10 '12 at 2:08
Michael Durrant
9,68122856
1
It' not so much a question of the employee 'looking bad' in the eyes of the recruiter. It's that the recruiter may well claim via lawsuit that the hiring company violated the written contract with the recruiter.
– Jim In Texas
Jul 10 '12 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
If the job is a different one and you are applying from scratch, you have no legal obligation.
However, if you think your chances will be enhanced by them having met and maybe tested you already via the recuiter, then ethically you should at least contact the recruiter.
Also, it may well pay off later. Often recruiters are allied to companies and it might look pretty bad if he stops by the company after you are hired.
edited Jul 10 '12 at 15:00
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Jul 10 '12 at 2:08
Michael Durrant
9,68122856
If the job is a different one and you are applying from scratch, you have no legal obligation.
However, if you think your chances will be enhanced by them having met and maybe tested you already via the recuiter, then ethically you should at least contact the recruiter.
Also, it may well pay off later. Often recruiters are allied to companies and it might look pretty bad if he stops by the company after you are hired.
edited Jul 10 '12 at 15:00
yoozer8
4,10442955
answered Jul 10 '12 at 2:08
Michael Durrant
9,68122856
edited Jul 10 '12 at 15:00
yoozer8
4,10442955
edited Jul 10 '12 at 15:00
yoozer8
4,10442955
edited Jul 10 '12 at 15:00
yoozer8
4,10442955
4,10442955
answered Jul 10 '12 at 2:08
Michael Durrant
9,68122856
answered Jul 10 '12 at 2:08
Michael Durrant
9,68122856
answered Jul 10 '12 at 2:08
Michael Durrant
9,68122856
9,68122856
1
It' not so much a question of the employee 'looking bad' in the eyes of the recruiter. It's that the recruiter may well claim via lawsuit that the hiring company violated the written contract with the recruiter.
– Jim In Texas
Jul 10 '12 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
1
It' not so much a question of the employee 'looking bad' in the eyes of the recruiter. It's that the recruiter may well claim via lawsuit that the hiring company violated the written contract with the recruiter.
– Jim In Texas
Jul 10 '12 at 4:55
1
1
It' not so much a question of the employee 'looking bad' in the eyes of the recruiter. It's that the recruiter may well claim via lawsuit that the hiring company violated the written contract with the recruiter.
– Jim In Texas
Jul 10 '12 at 4:55
It' not so much a question of the employee 'looking bad' in the eyes of the recruiter. It's that the recruiter may well claim via lawsuit that the hiring company violated the written contract with the recruiter.
– Jim In Texas
Jul 10 '12 at 4:55
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Had the headhunter not made any preliminary agreement with you, even as lightweight as an email?
I have recently decided to take back more control on when/which employers get to receive my CV, so I re-read the emails I exchanged last year with a headhunter. In his 1st email there were some conditions, which I naively accepted, implying in vague language that he could send my CV to other potential employers besides the original one, with no expiration date.
So I emailed him to withdraw from the agreement, as @Jim In Texas advised.
Further to that, whenever I work with headhunters in the future, I plan to put in an email right from the start that they have to get my consent before proposing me for each single job opportunity. They earn big fees when they place someone, so I figure they will still propose me if they really believe my profile matches, while giving me more control on my job search.
answered Aug 8 '14 at 12:15
lifExplorer
857
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Had the headhunter not made any preliminary agreement with you, even as lightweight as an email?
I have recently decided to take back more control on when/which employers get to receive my CV, so I re-read the emails I exchanged last year with a headhunter. In his 1st email there were some conditions, which I naively accepted, implying in vague language that he could send my CV to other potential employers besides the original one, with no expiration date.
So I emailed him to withdraw from the agreement, as @Jim In Texas advised.
Further to that, whenever I work with headhunters in the future, I plan to put in an email right from the start that they have to get my consent before proposing me for each single job opportunity. They earn big fees when they place someone, so I figure they will still propose me if they really believe my profile matches, while giving me more control on my job search.
answered Aug 8 '14 at 12:15
lifExplorer
857
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Had the headhunter not made any preliminary agreement with you, even as lightweight as an email?
I have recently decided to take back more control on when/which employers get to receive my CV, so I re-read the emails I exchanged last year with a headhunter. In his 1st email there were some conditions, which I naively accepted, implying in vague language that he could send my CV to other potential employers besides the original one, with no expiration date.
So I emailed him to withdraw from the agreement, as @Jim In Texas advised.
Further to that, whenever I work with headhunters in the future, I plan to put in an email right from the start that they have to get my consent before proposing me for each single job opportunity. They earn big fees when they place someone, so I figure they will still propose me if they really believe my profile matches, while giving me more control on my job search.
answered Aug 8 '14 at 12:15
lifExplorer
857
Had the headhunter not made any preliminary agreement with you, even as lightweight as an email?
I have recently decided to take back more control on when/which employers get to receive my CV, so I re-read the emails I exchanged last year with a headhunter. In his 1st email there were some conditions, which I naively accepted, implying in vague language that he could send my CV to other potential employers besides the original one, with no expiration date.
So I emailed him to withdraw from the agreement, as @Jim In Texas advised.
Further to that, whenever I work with headhunters in the future, I plan to put in an email right from the start that they have to get my consent before proposing me for each single job opportunity. They earn big fees when they place someone, so I figure they will still propose me if they really believe my profile matches, while giving me more control on my job search.
answered Aug 8 '14 at 12:15
lifExplorer
857
answered Aug 8 '14 at 12:15
lifExplorer
857
answered Aug 8 '14 at 12:15
lifExplorer
857
answered Aug 8 '14 at 12:15
lifExplorer
857
857
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2389%2fsevering-the-relationship-with-a-recruiter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
2
Do you have any sort of contractual obligation to the recruiter?
– jcmeloni
Jul 9 '12 at 23:58
1
None. Other than they've presented me to their clients over the years. I don't exactly know how to communicate that I no longer wish to be a client to them and the firms they may have presented me to in the past.
– ewwhite
Jul 10 '12 at 0:01
1
Thanks for clarifying; @MathAttack's answer pretty well covers what I would say in this situation!
– jcmeloni
Jul 10 '12 at 10:44