Mixing
![Office flatulence is getting out of control [duplicate]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgjbpfN9tAutmK93bJRC3ZoROZzi2TJDms5n8_qJuhgE0a9b52OOHayv3NGT8igAdFL7byXNst-_1DZK5SjrIJ28_6RQPUpBROqMs5s6jo-ZsjX8kjDwfxJufIitH3TaQRXWaGSQKRQib-f/s72-c/1.jpg)
How can I manage a growing team?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I'm the admin assistant of the CTO and our organization has recently experienced a lot of growth. Within six months, we have merged with another organization and our Dev team has grown from 8 to 16, with another 8 people in QA.
What we're dealing with now is a highly technical individual, with little patience, managing a much larger team than he's accustomed to, 40% of which is junior as well as an increase in the number of projects. Needless to say, my boss is being pulled in too many directions at once. How can I help him manage his workload and his team so that the team feels they're getting enough help and support and remain effective?
career-development software-industry management human-resources
edited Jan 17 '14 at 13:53
Jim G.
11.8k105373
asked Aug 28 '12 at 18:46
B00Tz
561
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I'm the admin assistant of the CTO and our organization has recently experienced a lot of growth. Within six months, we have merged with another organization and our Dev team has grown from 8 to 16, with another 8 people in QA.
What we're dealing with now is a highly technical individual, with little patience, managing a much larger team than he's accustomed to, 40% of which is junior as well as an increase in the number of projects. Needless to say, my boss is being pulled in too many directions at once. How can I help him manage his workload and his team so that the team feels they're getting enough help and support and remain effective?
career-development software-industry management human-resources
edited Jan 17 '14 at 13:53
Jim G.
11.8k105373
asked Aug 28 '12 at 18:46
B00Tz
561
Might be quite relevant... workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/2986/…
– Elysian Fields♦
Aug 28 '12 at 19:41
3
Your boss should NOT be doing any technical work at all. He should be managing other people's work. So first, he needs to drop all developement he himself is doing. That will likely free up some time.
– HLGEM
Aug 29 '12 at 19:16
@HLGEM There are tech managers with more than 16 direct reports who also act as individual contributors, although I grant they are rare. It sounds like he should not be doing technical work because he isn't efficiently running his department, and that's one thing he should be able to effectively delegate.
– jimm101
Apr 11 '16 at 13:03
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I'm the admin assistant of the CTO and our organization has recently experienced a lot of growth. Within six months, we have merged with another organization and our Dev team has grown from 8 to 16, with another 8 people in QA.
What we're dealing with now is a highly technical individual, with little patience, managing a much larger team than he's accustomed to, 40% of which is junior as well as an increase in the number of projects. Needless to say, my boss is being pulled in too many directions at once. How can I help him manage his workload and his team so that the team feels they're getting enough help and support and remain effective?
career-development software-industry management human-resources
edited Jan 17 '14 at 13:53
Jim G.
11.8k105373
asked Aug 28 '12 at 18:46
B00Tz
561
I'm the admin assistant of the CTO and our organization has recently experienced a lot of growth. Within six months, we have merged with another organization and our Dev team has grown from 8 to 16, with another 8 people in QA.
What we're dealing with now is a highly technical individual, with little patience, managing a much larger team than he's accustomed to, 40% of which is junior as well as an increase in the number of projects. Needless to say, my boss is being pulled in too many directions at once. How can I help him manage his workload and his team so that the team feels they're getting enough help and support and remain effective?
career-development software-industry management human-resources
edited Jan 17 '14 at 13:53
Jim G.
11.8k105373
asked Aug 28 '12 at 18:46
B00Tz
561
edited Jan 17 '14 at 13:53
Jim G.
11.8k105373
edited Jan 17 '14 at 13:53
Jim G.
11.8k105373
edited Jan 17 '14 at 13:53
Jim G.
11.8k105373
11.8k105373
asked Aug 28 '12 at 18:46
B00Tz
561
asked Aug 28 '12 at 18:46
B00Tz
561
asked Aug 28 '12 at 18:46
B00Tz
561
561
Might be quite relevant... workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/2986/…
– Elysian Fields♦
Aug 28 '12 at 19:41
3
Your boss should NOT be doing any technical work at all. He should be managing other people's work. So first, he needs to drop all developement he himself is doing. That will likely free up some time.
– HLGEM
Aug 29 '12 at 19:16
@HLGEM There are tech managers with more than 16 direct reports who also act as individual contributors, although I grant they are rare. It sounds like he should not be doing technical work because he isn't efficiently running his department, and that's one thing he should be able to effectively delegate.
– jimm101
Apr 11 '16 at 13:03
add a comment |Â
Might be quite relevant... workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/2986/…
– Elysian Fields♦
Aug 28 '12 at 19:41
3
Your boss should NOT be doing any technical work at all. He should be managing other people's work. So first, he needs to drop all developement he himself is doing. That will likely free up some time.
– HLGEM
Aug 29 '12 at 19:16
@HLGEM There are tech managers with more than 16 direct reports who also act as individual contributors, although I grant they are rare. It sounds like he should not be doing technical work because he isn't efficiently running his department, and that's one thing he should be able to effectively delegate.
– jimm101
Apr 11 '16 at 13:03
Might be quite relevant... workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/2986/…
– Elysian Fields♦
Aug 28 '12 at 19:41
Might be quite relevant... workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/2986/…
– Elysian Fields♦
Aug 28 '12 at 19:41
3
3
Your boss should NOT be doing any technical work at all. He should be managing other people's work. So first, he needs to drop all developement he himself is doing. That will likely free up some time.
– HLGEM
Aug 29 '12 at 19:16
Your boss should NOT be doing any technical work at all. He should be managing other people's work. So first, he needs to drop all developement he himself is doing. That will likely free up some time.
– HLGEM
Aug 29 '12 at 19:16
@HLGEM There are tech managers with more than 16 direct reports who also act as individual contributors, although I grant they are rare. It sounds like he should not be doing technical work because he isn't efficiently running his department, and that's one thing he should be able to effectively delegate.
– jimm101
Apr 11 '16 at 13:03
@HLGEM There are tech managers with more than 16 direct reports who also act as individual contributors, although I grant they are rare. It sounds like he should not be doing technical work because he isn't efficiently running his department, and that's one thing he should be able to effectively delegate.
– jimm101
Apr 11 '16 at 13:03
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
Talk with your boss about whether he could delegate any of his work. He doesn't have to create permanent levels of middle-management; can he appoint a tech lead for each key project and let those people handle the day-to-day stuff?
Try to identify tasks that could be off-loaded entirely, and candidates within the organization who could do them. When my current company was small the engineering manager interviewed all candidates; as we grew that became unworkable, and now we have a few developers who are in charge of the interviewing, with permission to draw in others as needed, and the manager interviews only the most-senior, business-affecting candidates. Identify the things "like that" in your organization, the things your boss is involved in "because he always has been" rather than "because he needs to be", and help find other ways to get those things done.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 19:40
Monica Cellio♦
43.7k17114191
2
I have heard this called "managing up," and it's usually illustrated by having a staffer ask their manager, "What can I do to make you successful? In your case, if you propose having your boss delegate some things to you (or whoever), that will free up some of their time to actually make progress. If you have time to do it, it's great for you and for your boss. Everybody wins!
– Will E.
Aug 29 '12 at 15:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Your boss sounds like a senior dev or team lead acting as a CTO; in most hierarchies that puts him at least two levels above his pay grade. It sounds to me that if you have a CTO who is focusing on the small details and is being overwhelmed by them, he needs to grow into his position a little, and adjust the "zoom level" on his corporate magnifying glass, to focus on the people, the teams and the big picture, not the minutiae.
The first thing I would do as the CTO is identify the functional teams within his hierarchy. Those 16 devs and 8 QA are probably more like 2 groups of 8 devs and 4 BA/QA. I would identify what they're working on and who's working on it, name these as teams, and appoint someone to be "team lead". If there are two or more "teams" working on the same overall "project", consider a "project manager" whose job it is to oversee the day-to-day of both teams. This is a judgement call and can be quite political, especially picking someone over someone else of equal or greater perceived qualifications (experience, education, seniority, skills). So it probably won't be an easy call, but that's why he's the CTO; he gets to make the tough calls.
With that sorted, the CTO's job is to manage the teams through the team leads. At its most basic, the job of every worker's supervisor, from the senior dev to the CTO of the company, is to make the decision that extends beyond the scope of the worker's own control, thus removing the hindrance to their work. A junior coder pretty much can't make a decision in his work that affects anyone beyond himself; a senior dev can affect the path of the junior coders he supervises. A senior dev can't make decisions affecting the entire team; a team lead can. A team lead can't make decisions that affect other teams; a project manager can. A project manager can't make decisions that impact the entire business; a CTO can. Here's the rub; a CTO shouldn't be making the decisions that affect only one senior dev and his juniors. That's the team lead's job. It's when the team lead and/or the project manager can't solve the problem that they bring it to the CTO.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 22:47
KeithS
2,085912
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
Talk with your boss about whether he could delegate any of his work. He doesn't have to create permanent levels of middle-management; can he appoint a tech lead for each key project and let those people handle the day-to-day stuff?
Try to identify tasks that could be off-loaded entirely, and candidates within the organization who could do them. When my current company was small the engineering manager interviewed all candidates; as we grew that became unworkable, and now we have a few developers who are in charge of the interviewing, with permission to draw in others as needed, and the manager interviews only the most-senior, business-affecting candidates. Identify the things "like that" in your organization, the things your boss is involved in "because he always has been" rather than "because he needs to be", and help find other ways to get those things done.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 19:40
Monica Cellio♦
43.7k17114191
2
I have heard this called "managing up," and it's usually illustrated by having a staffer ask their manager, "What can I do to make you successful? In your case, if you propose having your boss delegate some things to you (or whoever), that will free up some of their time to actually make progress. If you have time to do it, it's great for you and for your boss. Everybody wins!
– Will E.
Aug 29 '12 at 15:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
Talk with your boss about whether he could delegate any of his work. He doesn't have to create permanent levels of middle-management; can he appoint a tech lead for each key project and let those people handle the day-to-day stuff?
Try to identify tasks that could be off-loaded entirely, and candidates within the organization who could do them. When my current company was small the engineering manager interviewed all candidates; as we grew that became unworkable, and now we have a few developers who are in charge of the interviewing, with permission to draw in others as needed, and the manager interviews only the most-senior, business-affecting candidates. Identify the things "like that" in your organization, the things your boss is involved in "because he always has been" rather than "because he needs to be", and help find other ways to get those things done.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 19:40
Monica Cellio♦
43.7k17114191
2
I have heard this called "managing up," and it's usually illustrated by having a staffer ask their manager, "What can I do to make you successful? In your case, if you propose having your boss delegate some things to you (or whoever), that will free up some of their time to actually make progress. If you have time to do it, it's great for you and for your boss. Everybody wins!
– Will E.
Aug 29 '12 at 15:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
Talk with your boss about whether he could delegate any of his work. He doesn't have to create permanent levels of middle-management; can he appoint a tech lead for each key project and let those people handle the day-to-day stuff?
Try to identify tasks that could be off-loaded entirely, and candidates within the organization who could do them. When my current company was small the engineering manager interviewed all candidates; as we grew that became unworkable, and now we have a few developers who are in charge of the interviewing, with permission to draw in others as needed, and the manager interviews only the most-senior, business-affecting candidates. Identify the things "like that" in your organization, the things your boss is involved in "because he always has been" rather than "because he needs to be", and help find other ways to get those things done.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 19:40
Monica Cellio♦
43.7k17114191
Talk with your boss about whether he could delegate any of his work. He doesn't have to create permanent levels of middle-management; can he appoint a tech lead for each key project and let those people handle the day-to-day stuff?
Try to identify tasks that could be off-loaded entirely, and candidates within the organization who could do them. When my current company was small the engineering manager interviewed all candidates; as we grew that became unworkable, and now we have a few developers who are in charge of the interviewing, with permission to draw in others as needed, and the manager interviews only the most-senior, business-affecting candidates. Identify the things "like that" in your organization, the things your boss is involved in "because he always has been" rather than "because he needs to be", and help find other ways to get those things done.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 19:40
Monica Cellio♦
43.7k17114191
answered Aug 28 '12 at 19:40
Monica Cellio♦
43.7k17114191
answered Aug 28 '12 at 19:40
Monica Cellio♦
43.7k17114191
answered Aug 28 '12 at 19:40
Monica Cellio♦
43.7k17114191
43.7k17114191
2
I have heard this called "managing up," and it's usually illustrated by having a staffer ask their manager, "What can I do to make you successful? In your case, if you propose having your boss delegate some things to you (or whoever), that will free up some of their time to actually make progress. If you have time to do it, it's great for you and for your boss. Everybody wins!
– Will E.
Aug 29 '12 at 15:00
add a comment |Â
2
I have heard this called "managing up," and it's usually illustrated by having a staffer ask their manager, "What can I do to make you successful? In your case, if you propose having your boss delegate some things to you (or whoever), that will free up some of their time to actually make progress. If you have time to do it, it's great for you and for your boss. Everybody wins!
– Will E.
Aug 29 '12 at 15:00
2
2
I have heard this called "managing up," and it's usually illustrated by having a staffer ask their manager, "What can I do to make you successful? In your case, if you propose having your boss delegate some things to you (or whoever), that will free up some of their time to actually make progress. If you have time to do it, it's great for you and for your boss. Everybody wins!
– Will E.
Aug 29 '12 at 15:00
I have heard this called "managing up," and it's usually illustrated by having a staffer ask their manager, "What can I do to make you successful? In your case, if you propose having your boss delegate some things to you (or whoever), that will free up some of their time to actually make progress. If you have time to do it, it's great for you and for your boss. Everybody wins!
– Will E.
Aug 29 '12 at 15:00
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Your boss sounds like a senior dev or team lead acting as a CTO; in most hierarchies that puts him at least two levels above his pay grade. It sounds to me that if you have a CTO who is focusing on the small details and is being overwhelmed by them, he needs to grow into his position a little, and adjust the "zoom level" on his corporate magnifying glass, to focus on the people, the teams and the big picture, not the minutiae.
The first thing I would do as the CTO is identify the functional teams within his hierarchy. Those 16 devs and 8 QA are probably more like 2 groups of 8 devs and 4 BA/QA. I would identify what they're working on and who's working on it, name these as teams, and appoint someone to be "team lead". If there are two or more "teams" working on the same overall "project", consider a "project manager" whose job it is to oversee the day-to-day of both teams. This is a judgement call and can be quite political, especially picking someone over someone else of equal or greater perceived qualifications (experience, education, seniority, skills). So it probably won't be an easy call, but that's why he's the CTO; he gets to make the tough calls.
With that sorted, the CTO's job is to manage the teams through the team leads. At its most basic, the job of every worker's supervisor, from the senior dev to the CTO of the company, is to make the decision that extends beyond the scope of the worker's own control, thus removing the hindrance to their work. A junior coder pretty much can't make a decision in his work that affects anyone beyond himself; a senior dev can affect the path of the junior coders he supervises. A senior dev can't make decisions affecting the entire team; a team lead can. A team lead can't make decisions that affect other teams; a project manager can. A project manager can't make decisions that impact the entire business; a CTO can. Here's the rub; a CTO shouldn't be making the decisions that affect only one senior dev and his juniors. That's the team lead's job. It's when the team lead and/or the project manager can't solve the problem that they bring it to the CTO.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 22:47
KeithS
2,085912
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
Your boss sounds like a senior dev or team lead acting as a CTO; in most hierarchies that puts him at least two levels above his pay grade. It sounds to me that if you have a CTO who is focusing on the small details and is being overwhelmed by them, he needs to grow into his position a little, and adjust the "zoom level" on his corporate magnifying glass, to focus on the people, the teams and the big picture, not the minutiae.
The first thing I would do as the CTO is identify the functional teams within his hierarchy. Those 16 devs and 8 QA are probably more like 2 groups of 8 devs and 4 BA/QA. I would identify what they're working on and who's working on it, name these as teams, and appoint someone to be "team lead". If there are two or more "teams" working on the same overall "project", consider a "project manager" whose job it is to oversee the day-to-day of both teams. This is a judgement call and can be quite political, especially picking someone over someone else of equal or greater perceived qualifications (experience, education, seniority, skills). So it probably won't be an easy call, but that's why he's the CTO; he gets to make the tough calls.
With that sorted, the CTO's job is to manage the teams through the team leads. At its most basic, the job of every worker's supervisor, from the senior dev to the CTO of the company, is to make the decision that extends beyond the scope of the worker's own control, thus removing the hindrance to their work. A junior coder pretty much can't make a decision in his work that affects anyone beyond himself; a senior dev can affect the path of the junior coders he supervises. A senior dev can't make decisions affecting the entire team; a team lead can. A team lead can't make decisions that affect other teams; a project manager can. A project manager can't make decisions that impact the entire business; a CTO can. Here's the rub; a CTO shouldn't be making the decisions that affect only one senior dev and his juniors. That's the team lead's job. It's when the team lead and/or the project manager can't solve the problem that they bring it to the CTO.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 22:47
KeithS
2,085912
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
Your boss sounds like a senior dev or team lead acting as a CTO; in most hierarchies that puts him at least two levels above his pay grade. It sounds to me that if you have a CTO who is focusing on the small details and is being overwhelmed by them, he needs to grow into his position a little, and adjust the "zoom level" on his corporate magnifying glass, to focus on the people, the teams and the big picture, not the minutiae.
The first thing I would do as the CTO is identify the functional teams within his hierarchy. Those 16 devs and 8 QA are probably more like 2 groups of 8 devs and 4 BA/QA. I would identify what they're working on and who's working on it, name these as teams, and appoint someone to be "team lead". If there are two or more "teams" working on the same overall "project", consider a "project manager" whose job it is to oversee the day-to-day of both teams. This is a judgement call and can be quite political, especially picking someone over someone else of equal or greater perceived qualifications (experience, education, seniority, skills). So it probably won't be an easy call, but that's why he's the CTO; he gets to make the tough calls.
With that sorted, the CTO's job is to manage the teams through the team leads. At its most basic, the job of every worker's supervisor, from the senior dev to the CTO of the company, is to make the decision that extends beyond the scope of the worker's own control, thus removing the hindrance to their work. A junior coder pretty much can't make a decision in his work that affects anyone beyond himself; a senior dev can affect the path of the junior coders he supervises. A senior dev can't make decisions affecting the entire team; a team lead can. A team lead can't make decisions that affect other teams; a project manager can. A project manager can't make decisions that impact the entire business; a CTO can. Here's the rub; a CTO shouldn't be making the decisions that affect only one senior dev and his juniors. That's the team lead's job. It's when the team lead and/or the project manager can't solve the problem that they bring it to the CTO.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 22:47
KeithS
2,085912
Your boss sounds like a senior dev or team lead acting as a CTO; in most hierarchies that puts him at least two levels above his pay grade. It sounds to me that if you have a CTO who is focusing on the small details and is being overwhelmed by them, he needs to grow into his position a little, and adjust the "zoom level" on his corporate magnifying glass, to focus on the people, the teams and the big picture, not the minutiae.
The first thing I would do as the CTO is identify the functional teams within his hierarchy. Those 16 devs and 8 QA are probably more like 2 groups of 8 devs and 4 BA/QA. I would identify what they're working on and who's working on it, name these as teams, and appoint someone to be "team lead". If there are two or more "teams" working on the same overall "project", consider a "project manager" whose job it is to oversee the day-to-day of both teams. This is a judgement call and can be quite political, especially picking someone over someone else of equal or greater perceived qualifications (experience, education, seniority, skills). So it probably won't be an easy call, but that's why he's the CTO; he gets to make the tough calls.
With that sorted, the CTO's job is to manage the teams through the team leads. At its most basic, the job of every worker's supervisor, from the senior dev to the CTO of the company, is to make the decision that extends beyond the scope of the worker's own control, thus removing the hindrance to their work. A junior coder pretty much can't make a decision in his work that affects anyone beyond himself; a senior dev can affect the path of the junior coders he supervises. A senior dev can't make decisions affecting the entire team; a team lead can. A team lead can't make decisions that affect other teams; a project manager can. A project manager can't make decisions that impact the entire business; a CTO can. Here's the rub; a CTO shouldn't be making the decisions that affect only one senior dev and his juniors. That's the team lead's job. It's when the team lead and/or the project manager can't solve the problem that they bring it to the CTO.
answered Aug 28 '12 at 22:47
KeithS
2,085912
edited Feb 12 '13 at 17:17
answered Aug 28 '12 at 22:47
KeithS
2,085912
answered Aug 28 '12 at 22:47
KeithS
2,085912
answered Aug 28 '12 at 22:47
KeithS
2,085912
2,085912
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3507%2fhow-can-i-manage-a-growing-team%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Might be quite relevant... workplace.stackexchange.com/questions/2986/…
– Elysian Fields♦
Aug 28 '12 at 19:41
3
Your boss should NOT be doing any technical work at all. He should be managing other people's work. So first, he needs to drop all developement he himself is doing. That will likely free up some time.
– HLGEM
Aug 29 '12 at 19:16
@HLGEM There are tech managers with more than 16 direct reports who also act as individual contributors, although I grant they are rare. It sounds like he should not be doing technical work because he isn't efficiently running his department, and that's one thing he should be able to effectively delegate.
– jimm101
Apr 11 '16 at 13:03