When is it ethical to use some company time and resources for one's professional benefit? [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
12
down vote

favorite
2












It's obvious, though, for example, that you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time (unless they assigned you a job to design something for them, though that's unlikely).



The general answer for this is probably no - it's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit. But some circumstances may call for it, right?



For this question, let's assume that you have completed the tasks for the day (although most likely, you could start tomorrow's work... but then again, there really isn't such a thing as absolute completion).



I've seen some questions here about people's employers unable or (dare I say) unwilling to provide training even if the training would benefit the company.



So, is it alright then, to do some learning to improve oneself, on company time, even for the company's benefit (again, because your employer is unable or unwilling to provide means for your professional advancement)?



No, we haven't ignored or we don't refuse anything else the company might provide.



To complicate things: What if your boss says "no, don't learn that because that's not and never going to be how we do things here?" If you don't, you'd be following instructions, though you could be sacrificing your marketability.



This is NOT a duplicate question How can I approach career development with a boss who doesn't seem to support this?. The answers there don't address whether or not it's alright to sneak personal professional development into some company time. For the most part, the answers suggest that it is ultimately the worker's responsibility. So now, if so, then is it alright to use some company time to exercise that responsibility? That's my question.




professionalism career-development ethics




share|improve this question














closed as off-topic by IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, user9158, scaaahu, Lilienthal♦ Oct 14 '15 at 10:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Real questions have answers. Rather than explaining why your situation is terrible, or why your boss/coworker makes you unhappy, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, click here." – Community, scaaahu, Lilienthal
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 14




    "...you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time. " Wouldn't that depend on why you're learning Photoshop? If you are responsible for editing pictures for a brochure or web site, I would think learning Photoshop on the company's time is perfectly acceptable.
    – GreenMatt
    Oct 9 '15 at 14:37







  • 11




    In some industries, it's expected that you continuously teach yourself new things! In software development, for example, learning new technologies is regularly a part of large projects.
    – Kevin
    Oct 9 '15 at 16:39






  • 3




    But you are not sacrificing your marketability. Your boss did not say don't learn that. He said don't use company time. You can chose to learn new skills on your own time. Try and pick a skill that is a clear benefit to the company to get an OK to use (some) company time.
    – paparazzo
    Oct 9 '15 at 17:41






  • 1




    "It's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit." Well, the company is using my time for their benefit so...
    – limdaepl
    Oct 10 '15 at 7:29






  • 1




    @limdaepl - I agree 110%. My biggest issue is that they think it's "I win, they lose", though I sincerely feel it's a win-win.
    – Mickael Caruso
    Oct 10 '15 at 12:55
















up vote
12
down vote

favorite
2












It's obvious, though, for example, that you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time (unless they assigned you a job to design something for them, though that's unlikely).



The general answer for this is probably no - it's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit. But some circumstances may call for it, right?



For this question, let's assume that you have completed the tasks for the day (although most likely, you could start tomorrow's work... but then again, there really isn't such a thing as absolute completion).



I've seen some questions here about people's employers unable or (dare I say) unwilling to provide training even if the training would benefit the company.



So, is it alright then, to do some learning to improve oneself, on company time, even for the company's benefit (again, because your employer is unable or unwilling to provide means for your professional advancement)?



No, we haven't ignored or we don't refuse anything else the company might provide.



To complicate things: What if your boss says "no, don't learn that because that's not and never going to be how we do things here?" If you don't, you'd be following instructions, though you could be sacrificing your marketability.



This is NOT a duplicate question How can I approach career development with a boss who doesn't seem to support this?. The answers there don't address whether or not it's alright to sneak personal professional development into some company time. For the most part, the answers suggest that it is ultimately the worker's responsibility. So now, if so, then is it alright to use some company time to exercise that responsibility? That's my question.




professionalism career-development ethics




share|improve this question














closed as off-topic by IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, user9158, scaaahu, Lilienthal♦ Oct 14 '15 at 10:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Real questions have answers. Rather than explaining why your situation is terrible, or why your boss/coworker makes you unhappy, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, click here." – Community, scaaahu, Lilienthal
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 14




    "...you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time. " Wouldn't that depend on why you're learning Photoshop? If you are responsible for editing pictures for a brochure or web site, I would think learning Photoshop on the company's time is perfectly acceptable.
    – GreenMatt
    Oct 9 '15 at 14:37







  • 11




    In some industries, it's expected that you continuously teach yourself new things! In software development, for example, learning new technologies is regularly a part of large projects.
    – Kevin
    Oct 9 '15 at 16:39






  • 3




    But you are not sacrificing your marketability. Your boss did not say don't learn that. He said don't use company time. You can chose to learn new skills on your own time. Try and pick a skill that is a clear benefit to the company to get an OK to use (some) company time.
    – paparazzo
    Oct 9 '15 at 17:41






  • 1




    "It's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit." Well, the company is using my time for their benefit so...
    – limdaepl
    Oct 10 '15 at 7:29






  • 1




    @limdaepl - I agree 110%. My biggest issue is that they think it's "I win, they lose", though I sincerely feel it's a win-win.
    – Mickael Caruso
    Oct 10 '15 at 12:55












up vote
12
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
12
down vote

favorite
2






2





It's obvious, though, for example, that you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time (unless they assigned you a job to design something for them, though that's unlikely).



The general answer for this is probably no - it's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit. But some circumstances may call for it, right?



For this question, let's assume that you have completed the tasks for the day (although most likely, you could start tomorrow's work... but then again, there really isn't such a thing as absolute completion).



I've seen some questions here about people's employers unable or (dare I say) unwilling to provide training even if the training would benefit the company.



So, is it alright then, to do some learning to improve oneself, on company time, even for the company's benefit (again, because your employer is unable or unwilling to provide means for your professional advancement)?



No, we haven't ignored or we don't refuse anything else the company might provide.



To complicate things: What if your boss says "no, don't learn that because that's not and never going to be how we do things here?" If you don't, you'd be following instructions, though you could be sacrificing your marketability.



This is NOT a duplicate question How can I approach career development with a boss who doesn't seem to support this?. The answers there don't address whether or not it's alright to sneak personal professional development into some company time. For the most part, the answers suggest that it is ultimately the worker's responsibility. So now, if so, then is it alright to use some company time to exercise that responsibility? That's my question.




professionalism career-development ethics




share|improve this question














It's obvious, though, for example, that you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time (unless they assigned you a job to design something for them, though that's unlikely).



The general answer for this is probably no - it's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit. But some circumstances may call for it, right?



For this question, let's assume that you have completed the tasks for the day (although most likely, you could start tomorrow's work... but then again, there really isn't such a thing as absolute completion).



I've seen some questions here about people's employers unable or (dare I say) unwilling to provide training even if the training would benefit the company.



So, is it alright then, to do some learning to improve oneself, on company time, even for the company's benefit (again, because your employer is unable or unwilling to provide means for your professional advancement)?



No, we haven't ignored or we don't refuse anything else the company might provide.



To complicate things: What if your boss says "no, don't learn that because that's not and never going to be how we do things here?" If you don't, you'd be following instructions, though you could be sacrificing your marketability.



This is NOT a duplicate question How can I approach career development with a boss who doesn't seem to support this?. The answers there don't address whether or not it's alright to sneak personal professional development into some company time. For the most part, the answers suggest that it is ultimately the worker's responsibility. So now, if so, then is it alright to use some company time to exercise that responsibility? That's my question.





professionalism career-development ethics





share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:48









Community♦

1




1










asked Oct 9 '15 at 14:33









Mickael Caruso

1,2611921




1,2611921




closed as off-topic by IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, user9158, scaaahu, Lilienthal♦ Oct 14 '15 at 10:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Real questions have answers. Rather than explaining why your situation is terrible, or why your boss/coworker makes you unhappy, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, click here." – Community, scaaahu, Lilienthal
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, user9158, scaaahu, Lilienthal♦ Oct 14 '15 at 10:34


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Real questions have answers. Rather than explaining why your situation is terrible, or why your boss/coworker makes you unhappy, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, click here." – Community, scaaahu, Lilienthal
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 14




    "...you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time. " Wouldn't that depend on why you're learning Photoshop? If you are responsible for editing pictures for a brochure or web site, I would think learning Photoshop on the company's time is perfectly acceptable.
    – GreenMatt
    Oct 9 '15 at 14:37







  • 11




    In some industries, it's expected that you continuously teach yourself new things! In software development, for example, learning new technologies is regularly a part of large projects.
    – Kevin
    Oct 9 '15 at 16:39






  • 3




    But you are not sacrificing your marketability. Your boss did not say don't learn that. He said don't use company time. You can chose to learn new skills on your own time. Try and pick a skill that is a clear benefit to the company to get an OK to use (some) company time.
    – paparazzo
    Oct 9 '15 at 17:41






  • 1




    "It's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit." Well, the company is using my time for their benefit so...
    – limdaepl
    Oct 10 '15 at 7:29






  • 1




    @limdaepl - I agree 110%. My biggest issue is that they think it's "I win, they lose", though I sincerely feel it's a win-win.
    – Mickael Caruso
    Oct 10 '15 at 12:55












  • 14




    "...you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time. " Wouldn't that depend on why you're learning Photoshop? If you are responsible for editing pictures for a brochure or web site, I would think learning Photoshop on the company's time is perfectly acceptable.
    – GreenMatt
    Oct 9 '15 at 14:37







  • 11




    In some industries, it's expected that you continuously teach yourself new things! In software development, for example, learning new technologies is regularly a part of large projects.
    – Kevin
    Oct 9 '15 at 16:39






  • 3




    But you are not sacrificing your marketability. Your boss did not say don't learn that. He said don't use company time. You can chose to learn new skills on your own time. Try and pick a skill that is a clear benefit to the company to get an OK to use (some) company time.
    – paparazzo
    Oct 9 '15 at 17:41






  • 1




    "It's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit." Well, the company is using my time for their benefit so...
    – limdaepl
    Oct 10 '15 at 7:29






  • 1




    @limdaepl - I agree 110%. My biggest issue is that they think it's "I win, they lose", though I sincerely feel it's a win-win.
    – Mickael Caruso
    Oct 10 '15 at 12:55







14




14




"...you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time. " Wouldn't that depend on why you're learning Photoshop? If you are responsible for editing pictures for a brochure or web site, I would think learning Photoshop on the company's time is perfectly acceptable.
– GreenMatt
Oct 9 '15 at 14:37





"...you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time. " Wouldn't that depend on why you're learning Photoshop? If you are responsible for editing pictures for a brochure or web site, I would think learning Photoshop on the company's time is perfectly acceptable.
– GreenMatt
Oct 9 '15 at 14:37





11




11




In some industries, it's expected that you continuously teach yourself new things! In software development, for example, learning new technologies is regularly a part of large projects.
– Kevin
Oct 9 '15 at 16:39




In some industries, it's expected that you continuously teach yourself new things! In software development, for example, learning new technologies is regularly a part of large projects.
– Kevin
Oct 9 '15 at 16:39




3




3




But you are not sacrificing your marketability. Your boss did not say don't learn that. He said don't use company time. You can chose to learn new skills on your own time. Try and pick a skill that is a clear benefit to the company to get an OK to use (some) company time.
– paparazzo
Oct 9 '15 at 17:41




But you are not sacrificing your marketability. Your boss did not say don't learn that. He said don't use company time. You can chose to learn new skills on your own time. Try and pick a skill that is a clear benefit to the company to get an OK to use (some) company time.
– paparazzo
Oct 9 '15 at 17:41




1




1




"It's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit." Well, the company is using my time for their benefit so...
– limdaepl
Oct 10 '15 at 7:29




"It's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit." Well, the company is using my time for their benefit so...
– limdaepl
Oct 10 '15 at 7:29




1




1




@limdaepl - I agree 110%. My biggest issue is that they think it's "I win, they lose", though I sincerely feel it's a win-win.
– Mickael Caruso
Oct 10 '15 at 12:55




@limdaepl - I agree 110%. My biggest issue is that they think it's "I win, they lose", though I sincerely feel it's a win-win.
– Mickael Caruso
Oct 10 '15 at 12:55










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
52
down vote



accepted










I think it comes down to company expectation. In the oil industry it is not uncommon for cranes to sit for weeks without being called for a lift and in general the only expectation is that the operator is there and ready when called upon. I know of a crane operator who learned several languages while sitting in his cab waiting to be called upon. This would be a sharp contrast to the restaurant industry where the mantra is "if you have time to lean, you have time to clean".



The best individual answer for you is going to come from your boss. If you ask first you won't have to apologize for making a wrong assumption.



To address the edit:
The answers there don't address whether or not it's alright to sneak personal professional development into some company time.



Your employer has the option of determining what you do on company time. If they say they don't want you spending time on learning accounting or the next big framework that is a reasonable constraint, the same as if they said they don't want you developing your career as a pro video game player. They are paying for your time so they get to decide how their investment is spent.



Sneaking in things that they have already shot down is a good way to ruin things for everyone. If you get caught a likely response from the company is more beaurocracy around training approval meaning that all training for everyone is harder to get. Don't be that guy.






share|improve this answer


















  • 10




    Yeah, back in college I had a job where 90% of the job was simply being in the room--they didn't want to have $100k of computers sitting there by an open door and nobody around. If someone needed help I was there but mostly it was just doing my schoolwork while getting paid.
    – Loren Pechtel
    Oct 10 '15 at 1:58






  • 4




    Reminds me of Albert Einsten, whose theories were developed in his free time when working in a pattent office...
    – Marc.2377
    Oct 10 '15 at 19:13






  • 1




    @Marc.2377 that should almost be an answer in itself!
    – Ernest Friedman-Hill
    Oct 11 '15 at 18:49

















up vote
10
down vote













Why not both? Do things that benefit you and the company.




The general answer for this is probably no - it's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit. But some circumstances may call for it, right?




This is a logical fallacy.



It's implying that either you OR the company get benefit or your work. So if you benefit, the company doesn't.



A good goal for employees is to continuously do things that maximize benefit to both them and the company. You want to do things that develop you as well as add value to the company. The better this works, the better your career will be.




It's obvious, though, for example, that you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time (unless they assigned you a job to design something for them, though that's unlikely).




Let's look at this example. If you phrase it like, "I want to learn mad Photoshop skilz" then yeah, it's not great.



But what if you presented it like:



  • "Hey boss, I was noticing that our communications are really low quality. Our team creates a lot of documents that don't look that great. I've wanted to learn Photoshop for a while - would you support me doing this so we can make our communications more professional?"

Win-win!



There will be industries that have more slack time. Some consulting companies, for example, have downtime between contracts. You can do the above then too, just phrased more like, "I would love to do X in the future, we have a bit of a downtime now, what do you think about me spending some time learning X? It'll add value to me and let us do Y/Z in the future."






share|improve this answer




















  • My problem is that I see it as a win-win, but my supervisors see it as I win, they lose. I can't be too specific, but they think that what I want to learn may apply to my profession in general, but doesn't apply to the company. Sorry for venting out, but it's a dire issue for me.
    – Mickael Caruso
    Oct 9 '15 at 17:17







  • 1




    ...please don't use Photoshop to create textual documents.
    – Yamikuronue
    Oct 9 '15 at 21:27






  • 1




    @MickaelCaruso Then if you can't phrase it in such a way that makes them see it as a win-win..... I'd say you shouldn't do it. They TOLD you you shouldn't. It's pretty clear at that point, no?
    – Patrice
    Oct 9 '15 at 21:50










  • @MickaelCaruso then what I wrote here means you are doing that wrong. It's not just "seeing it as win-win" but it's communicating that it's win-win to your supervisors.
    – Elysian Fields♦
    Oct 9 '15 at 22:05






  • 2




    @Yamikuronue Photoshop does a much better job of handling the kerning for all of the Papyrus font work the documents need.
    – Cort Ammon
    Oct 10 '15 at 20:15

















up vote
9
down vote













Definitely YES



If the learning would benefit your career and help you perform better at your role, then it is definitely ethical to learn after your work (or in your free time).



But, if it is for your own benefit which does not benefit the company, then NO.



For example, if I am a data scientist:



Can I learn data science technologies like Spark in my spare time or after work <-- YES



Can I learn photoshop? <-- NO It doesn't help you improve at your current role. You might want to do it at home.






share|improve this answer




















  • This is incorrect - Nobody can predict the future nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role.
    – Ed Heal
    Oct 10 '15 at 9:35










  • @EdHeal I have to disagree. Nobody can predict the future ** YES **nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role. PARTIALLY YES. But, I guess there is a definite line which can be drawn to say whether the skill is important for the skill or no. For example, photography skill is definitely not useful for a programming career. So, learning it at office, is wrong.
    – Dawny33
    Oct 10 '15 at 9:41











  • You are correct - my comment should have a clause within reason. However, photography may be useful skill for a web developer to learn?!
    – Ed Heal
    Oct 10 '15 at 9:43










  • - PS - Read up about TRIZ
    – Ed Heal
    Oct 10 '15 at 9:44

















up vote
3
down vote













As long as you aren't using up non-trivial consumables, are getting your work done, and are not interfering with the operation/competitiveness of your employer, you absolutely are justified in performing self-directed career development activities whenever you can get away with it.



MANY successful people got their start when they were bored at work and decided to do something about it. These folks usually do NOT "ask for permission" from their boss to do things like trying out an idea by way of a prototype, some writing, calculations or a design, or business plan. Smart bosses see this as initiative.



Just do it-- you probably won't get fired unless they want to get rid of you anyway and need a reason.






share|improve this answer
















  • 2




    I like to think that the saying "It is easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission" with this whole thing. Yes, I have slipped a lot of modern practices into our company because I see how effective and efficient they are. My boss doesn't like it and specifically told me that "it's not the way we do things here, you work for this company, not for the profession." This isn't the end. I have to learn as long as I meet my objectives.
    – Mickael Caruso
    Oct 13 '15 at 13:05










  • @MickaelCaruso, that's right, this is a long game. Your boss won't always be your boss. Nor is he necessarily interested in developing talent. Your career is in your hands.
    – teego1967
    Oct 13 '15 at 13:36











  • This. I started to teach myself how to program (which has since led to a career) when I was bored at work. I kept thinking, "Why am I doing these tasks? A computer could do them so much faster". Within 2-3 months, I was writing scripts (hacky, terrible scripts, in retrospect) that were helping the company out, and my boss gave me a 50% raise.
    – David Brandtz
    Oct 13 '15 at 16:18

















up vote
1
down vote













Many modern jobs are more project based than time based, but it's ultimately up to your employer. I would say it it all right if you're getting things done and if you're doing company things on your time. The lines of being "on the job" can get blurry.



I recall a lawyer saying, "If you're in the shower thinking about a client, it's billable."



This should open a dialog with your boss so you can find out what her expectations are and possible additional things you can learn to benefit the company and hopefully help your career as well.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote














    So, is it alright then, to do some learning to improve oneself, on
    company time, even for the company's benefit (again, because your
    employer is unable or unwilling to provide means for your professional
    advancement)?




    If you ask your boss for permission to "do some learning on company time" and you get consent, then it is perfectly alright to proceed with your learning.




    To complicate things: What if your boss says "no, don't learn that
    because that's not and never going to be how we do things here?" If
    you don't, you'd be following instructions, though you could be
    sacrificing your marketability.




    That doesn't complicate things at all - they become extremely simple in this case.



    In this case, you have been expressly forbidden from spending company time learning. In this case if you value your job you will not do so. Instead, learn on your own time.



    Easy.






    share|improve this answer




















    • It's easy because they told me straight up not on company time. But that is my struggle. I have very little time for learning outside work.
      – Mickael Caruso
      Oct 10 '15 at 13:05










    • I do find some time, albeit inadequate, but I take it.
      – Mickael Caruso
      Oct 11 '15 at 11:37

















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    There was an ethics class where I mentioned hiding things as a symptom something is wrong in a relationship--not that we should openly do bad things, but the question of whether something is done without the faintest attempt to hide it; if you're hiding your dealings with another from your spouse, that's a red flag. You are not obligated to catalogue every interaction with every person you meet, but if you start hoping or acting so that your spouse doesn't learn of certain interactions, there's probably something wrong.



    There are some kinds of legitimate secrets to hold--a surprise birthday party, for instance, but then the question comes of, "What if the other person found out?" If despite your best efforts your spouse finds you were attempting to orchestrate a nice surprise birthday party for them, they will unlikely be furious. A hair of the wrong color on your collar is a slightly different matter.



    The professor suggested that secrecy / hiding / withholding information is a noteworthy red flag not just in relationships but in ethics in general.



    I don't think you need to get explicit approval for every self-training, but I would try to be on the same page as your employer. This could mean no self-training, but if you are doing all your work, many bosses will see self-training on top of that as increasing your value to the company. So don't sneak it and feel guilty; ask your boss about general expectations and self-train in ways where you are on the same page as your boss.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Different companies have different cultures about how acceptable this is. However, if your current boss has directly told you not to learn something on company time, then you are at risk of being fired if you do so. Once a boss has forbidden an action, then don't do it. You say you view it as a win-win, but clearly your boss does not and his opinion matters more than yours as far as what you spend your time on at work. If you genuinely think it is a win for the company then make the business case, but the boss is the final decider and you need to accept that gracefully if he decides against what you want.



      Find something acceptable to your boss to do during down time. It might be a language that you need more depth in that the company currently uses. It might be creating a proposal for some new system you would like to implement. It might be learning more about the business domain. It might be cleaning out old file cabinets! The company owns your time during the work day, it's their choice what they want to pay for.



      If you want to get qualified for things your company does not use or intend to use, then do that on your own time. It is the same as if I decided I wanted to be a doctor, you wouldn't expect my current company to pay for a qualification like that that they get no direct benefit from would you? Learning a tool that they don't use is useless to them and they are entitled to decide not to pay for it. There are always things you can learn that will help in your current job.






      share|improve this answer





























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        • Is there something else you could usefully do in your current (or similar) role such as perhaps helping a colleague. "Finding something to do" work, essentially?


        • Is there something else you could do to benefit the company, such as learn a useful related technology or skill?


        • When asking your manager if there's anything further he'd like you to do, what was his response?


        • Can you find anything useful to do: review documents, vacuum the hall, clean the kitchen?


        If you've answered no to all the above, then you truly have nothing useful to provide the company at the present time and I wouldn't see a problem with doing something non-company-related: however you shouldn't just do this off your own back.



        Go and discuss it with your manager, explain the situation and ask how he'd like you to use your time: charity or open source work, for example. If he still has no response, ask if you can undertake some personal projects.



        Even then, I'd still try to avoid making money on someone else's time: can you find a personal development project which has a soft benefit to you (learning a skill you may find useful later, learning a foreign language, researching interesting technology etc) and if possible a potential benefit to the employer.



        Try to avoid tasks that would directly make you money.






        share|improve this answer



























          9 Answers
          9






          active

          oldest

          votes








          9 Answers
          9






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          52
          down vote



          accepted










          I think it comes down to company expectation. In the oil industry it is not uncommon for cranes to sit for weeks without being called for a lift and in general the only expectation is that the operator is there and ready when called upon. I know of a crane operator who learned several languages while sitting in his cab waiting to be called upon. This would be a sharp contrast to the restaurant industry where the mantra is "if you have time to lean, you have time to clean".



          The best individual answer for you is going to come from your boss. If you ask first you won't have to apologize for making a wrong assumption.



          To address the edit:
          The answers there don't address whether or not it's alright to sneak personal professional development into some company time.



          Your employer has the option of determining what you do on company time. If they say they don't want you spending time on learning accounting or the next big framework that is a reasonable constraint, the same as if they said they don't want you developing your career as a pro video game player. They are paying for your time so they get to decide how their investment is spent.



          Sneaking in things that they have already shot down is a good way to ruin things for everyone. If you get caught a likely response from the company is more beaurocracy around training approval meaning that all training for everyone is harder to get. Don't be that guy.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 10




            Yeah, back in college I had a job where 90% of the job was simply being in the room--they didn't want to have $100k of computers sitting there by an open door and nobody around. If someone needed help I was there but mostly it was just doing my schoolwork while getting paid.
            – Loren Pechtel
            Oct 10 '15 at 1:58






          • 4




            Reminds me of Albert Einsten, whose theories were developed in his free time when working in a pattent office...
            – Marc.2377
            Oct 10 '15 at 19:13






          • 1




            @Marc.2377 that should almost be an answer in itself!
            – Ernest Friedman-Hill
            Oct 11 '15 at 18:49














          up vote
          52
          down vote



          accepted










          I think it comes down to company expectation. In the oil industry it is not uncommon for cranes to sit for weeks without being called for a lift and in general the only expectation is that the operator is there and ready when called upon. I know of a crane operator who learned several languages while sitting in his cab waiting to be called upon. This would be a sharp contrast to the restaurant industry where the mantra is "if you have time to lean, you have time to clean".



          The best individual answer for you is going to come from your boss. If you ask first you won't have to apologize for making a wrong assumption.



          To address the edit:
          The answers there don't address whether or not it's alright to sneak personal professional development into some company time.



          Your employer has the option of determining what you do on company time. If they say they don't want you spending time on learning accounting or the next big framework that is a reasonable constraint, the same as if they said they don't want you developing your career as a pro video game player. They are paying for your time so they get to decide how their investment is spent.



          Sneaking in things that they have already shot down is a good way to ruin things for everyone. If you get caught a likely response from the company is more beaurocracy around training approval meaning that all training for everyone is harder to get. Don't be that guy.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 10




            Yeah, back in college I had a job where 90% of the job was simply being in the room--they didn't want to have $100k of computers sitting there by an open door and nobody around. If someone needed help I was there but mostly it was just doing my schoolwork while getting paid.
            – Loren Pechtel
            Oct 10 '15 at 1:58






          • 4




            Reminds me of Albert Einsten, whose theories were developed in his free time when working in a pattent office...
            – Marc.2377
            Oct 10 '15 at 19:13






          • 1




            @Marc.2377 that should almost be an answer in itself!
            – Ernest Friedman-Hill
            Oct 11 '15 at 18:49












          up vote
          52
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          52
          down vote



          accepted






          I think it comes down to company expectation. In the oil industry it is not uncommon for cranes to sit for weeks without being called for a lift and in general the only expectation is that the operator is there and ready when called upon. I know of a crane operator who learned several languages while sitting in his cab waiting to be called upon. This would be a sharp contrast to the restaurant industry where the mantra is "if you have time to lean, you have time to clean".



          The best individual answer for you is going to come from your boss. If you ask first you won't have to apologize for making a wrong assumption.



          To address the edit:
          The answers there don't address whether or not it's alright to sneak personal professional development into some company time.



          Your employer has the option of determining what you do on company time. If they say they don't want you spending time on learning accounting or the next big framework that is a reasonable constraint, the same as if they said they don't want you developing your career as a pro video game player. They are paying for your time so they get to decide how their investment is spent.



          Sneaking in things that they have already shot down is a good way to ruin things for everyone. If you get caught a likely response from the company is more beaurocracy around training approval meaning that all training for everyone is harder to get. Don't be that guy.






          share|improve this answer














          I think it comes down to company expectation. In the oil industry it is not uncommon for cranes to sit for weeks without being called for a lift and in general the only expectation is that the operator is there and ready when called upon. I know of a crane operator who learned several languages while sitting in his cab waiting to be called upon. This would be a sharp contrast to the restaurant industry where the mantra is "if you have time to lean, you have time to clean".



          The best individual answer for you is going to come from your boss. If you ask first you won't have to apologize for making a wrong assumption.



          To address the edit:
          The answers there don't address whether or not it's alright to sneak personal professional development into some company time.



          Your employer has the option of determining what you do on company time. If they say they don't want you spending time on learning accounting or the next big framework that is a reasonable constraint, the same as if they said they don't want you developing your career as a pro video game player. They are paying for your time so they get to decide how their investment is spent.



          Sneaking in things that they have already shot down is a good way to ruin things for everyone. If you get caught a likely response from the company is more beaurocracy around training approval meaning that all training for everyone is harder to get. Don't be that guy.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Oct 11 '15 at 13:43

























          answered Oct 9 '15 at 14:49









          Myles

          25.4k658104




          25.4k658104







          • 10




            Yeah, back in college I had a job where 90% of the job was simply being in the room--they didn't want to have $100k of computers sitting there by an open door and nobody around. If someone needed help I was there but mostly it was just doing my schoolwork while getting paid.
            – Loren Pechtel
            Oct 10 '15 at 1:58






          • 4




            Reminds me of Albert Einsten, whose theories were developed in his free time when working in a pattent office...
            – Marc.2377
            Oct 10 '15 at 19:13






          • 1




            @Marc.2377 that should almost be an answer in itself!
            – Ernest Friedman-Hill
            Oct 11 '15 at 18:49












          • 10




            Yeah, back in college I had a job where 90% of the job was simply being in the room--they didn't want to have $100k of computers sitting there by an open door and nobody around. If someone needed help I was there but mostly it was just doing my schoolwork while getting paid.
            – Loren Pechtel
            Oct 10 '15 at 1:58






          • 4




            Reminds me of Albert Einsten, whose theories were developed in his free time when working in a pattent office...
            – Marc.2377
            Oct 10 '15 at 19:13






          • 1




            @Marc.2377 that should almost be an answer in itself!
            – Ernest Friedman-Hill
            Oct 11 '15 at 18:49







          10




          10




          Yeah, back in college I had a job where 90% of the job was simply being in the room--they didn't want to have $100k of computers sitting there by an open door and nobody around. If someone needed help I was there but mostly it was just doing my schoolwork while getting paid.
          – Loren Pechtel
          Oct 10 '15 at 1:58




          Yeah, back in college I had a job where 90% of the job was simply being in the room--they didn't want to have $100k of computers sitting there by an open door and nobody around. If someone needed help I was there but mostly it was just doing my schoolwork while getting paid.
          – Loren Pechtel
          Oct 10 '15 at 1:58




          4




          4




          Reminds me of Albert Einsten, whose theories were developed in his free time when working in a pattent office...
          – Marc.2377
          Oct 10 '15 at 19:13




          Reminds me of Albert Einsten, whose theories were developed in his free time when working in a pattent office...
          – Marc.2377
          Oct 10 '15 at 19:13




          1




          1




          @Marc.2377 that should almost be an answer in itself!
          – Ernest Friedman-Hill
          Oct 11 '15 at 18:49




          @Marc.2377 that should almost be an answer in itself!
          – Ernest Friedman-Hill
          Oct 11 '15 at 18:49












          up vote
          10
          down vote













          Why not both? Do things that benefit you and the company.




          The general answer for this is probably no - it's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit. But some circumstances may call for it, right?




          This is a logical fallacy.



          It's implying that either you OR the company get benefit or your work. So if you benefit, the company doesn't.



          A good goal for employees is to continuously do things that maximize benefit to both them and the company. You want to do things that develop you as well as add value to the company. The better this works, the better your career will be.




          It's obvious, though, for example, that you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time (unless they assigned you a job to design something for them, though that's unlikely).




          Let's look at this example. If you phrase it like, "I want to learn mad Photoshop skilz" then yeah, it's not great.



          But what if you presented it like:



          • "Hey boss, I was noticing that our communications are really low quality. Our team creates a lot of documents that don't look that great. I've wanted to learn Photoshop for a while - would you support me doing this so we can make our communications more professional?"

          Win-win!



          There will be industries that have more slack time. Some consulting companies, for example, have downtime between contracts. You can do the above then too, just phrased more like, "I would love to do X in the future, we have a bit of a downtime now, what do you think about me spending some time learning X? It'll add value to me and let us do Y/Z in the future."






          share|improve this answer




















          • My problem is that I see it as a win-win, but my supervisors see it as I win, they lose. I can't be too specific, but they think that what I want to learn may apply to my profession in general, but doesn't apply to the company. Sorry for venting out, but it's a dire issue for me.
            – Mickael Caruso
            Oct 9 '15 at 17:17







          • 1




            ...please don't use Photoshop to create textual documents.
            – Yamikuronue
            Oct 9 '15 at 21:27






          • 1




            @MickaelCaruso Then if you can't phrase it in such a way that makes them see it as a win-win..... I'd say you shouldn't do it. They TOLD you you shouldn't. It's pretty clear at that point, no?
            – Patrice
            Oct 9 '15 at 21:50










          • @MickaelCaruso then what I wrote here means you are doing that wrong. It's not just "seeing it as win-win" but it's communicating that it's win-win to your supervisors.
            – Elysian Fields♦
            Oct 9 '15 at 22:05






          • 2




            @Yamikuronue Photoshop does a much better job of handling the kerning for all of the Papyrus font work the documents need.
            – Cort Ammon
            Oct 10 '15 at 20:15














          up vote
          10
          down vote













          Why not both? Do things that benefit you and the company.




          The general answer for this is probably no - it's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit. But some circumstances may call for it, right?




          This is a logical fallacy.



          It's implying that either you OR the company get benefit or your work. So if you benefit, the company doesn't.



          A good goal for employees is to continuously do things that maximize benefit to both them and the company. You want to do things that develop you as well as add value to the company. The better this works, the better your career will be.




          It's obvious, though, for example, that you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time (unless they assigned you a job to design something for them, though that's unlikely).




          Let's look at this example. If you phrase it like, "I want to learn mad Photoshop skilz" then yeah, it's not great.



          But what if you presented it like:



          • "Hey boss, I was noticing that our communications are really low quality. Our team creates a lot of documents that don't look that great. I've wanted to learn Photoshop for a while - would you support me doing this so we can make our communications more professional?"

          Win-win!



          There will be industries that have more slack time. Some consulting companies, for example, have downtime between contracts. You can do the above then too, just phrased more like, "I would love to do X in the future, we have a bit of a downtime now, what do you think about me spending some time learning X? It'll add value to me and let us do Y/Z in the future."






          share|improve this answer




















          • My problem is that I see it as a win-win, but my supervisors see it as I win, they lose. I can't be too specific, but they think that what I want to learn may apply to my profession in general, but doesn't apply to the company. Sorry for venting out, but it's a dire issue for me.
            – Mickael Caruso
            Oct 9 '15 at 17:17







          • 1




            ...please don't use Photoshop to create textual documents.
            – Yamikuronue
            Oct 9 '15 at 21:27






          • 1




            @MickaelCaruso Then if you can't phrase it in such a way that makes them see it as a win-win..... I'd say you shouldn't do it. They TOLD you you shouldn't. It's pretty clear at that point, no?
            – Patrice
            Oct 9 '15 at 21:50










          • @MickaelCaruso then what I wrote here means you are doing that wrong. It's not just "seeing it as win-win" but it's communicating that it's win-win to your supervisors.
            – Elysian Fields♦
            Oct 9 '15 at 22:05






          • 2




            @Yamikuronue Photoshop does a much better job of handling the kerning for all of the Papyrus font work the documents need.
            – Cort Ammon
            Oct 10 '15 at 20:15












          up vote
          10
          down vote










          up vote
          10
          down vote









          Why not both? Do things that benefit you and the company.




          The general answer for this is probably no - it's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit. But some circumstances may call for it, right?




          This is a logical fallacy.



          It's implying that either you OR the company get benefit or your work. So if you benefit, the company doesn't.



          A good goal for employees is to continuously do things that maximize benefit to both them and the company. You want to do things that develop you as well as add value to the company. The better this works, the better your career will be.




          It's obvious, though, for example, that you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time (unless they assigned you a job to design something for them, though that's unlikely).




          Let's look at this example. If you phrase it like, "I want to learn mad Photoshop skilz" then yeah, it's not great.



          But what if you presented it like:



          • "Hey boss, I was noticing that our communications are really low quality. Our team creates a lot of documents that don't look that great. I've wanted to learn Photoshop for a while - would you support me doing this so we can make our communications more professional?"

          Win-win!



          There will be industries that have more slack time. Some consulting companies, for example, have downtime between contracts. You can do the above then too, just phrased more like, "I would love to do X in the future, we have a bit of a downtime now, what do you think about me spending some time learning X? It'll add value to me and let us do Y/Z in the future."






          share|improve this answer












          Why not both? Do things that benefit you and the company.




          The general answer for this is probably no - it's wrong to use their time and money for one's benefit. But some circumstances may call for it, right?




          This is a logical fallacy.



          It's implying that either you OR the company get benefit or your work. So if you benefit, the company doesn't.



          A good goal for employees is to continuously do things that maximize benefit to both them and the company. You want to do things that develop you as well as add value to the company. The better this works, the better your career will be.




          It's obvious, though, for example, that you shouldn't try to learn Photoshop on your financial firm's time (unless they assigned you a job to design something for them, though that's unlikely).




          Let's look at this example. If you phrase it like, "I want to learn mad Photoshop skilz" then yeah, it's not great.



          But what if you presented it like:



          • "Hey boss, I was noticing that our communications are really low quality. Our team creates a lot of documents that don't look that great. I've wanted to learn Photoshop for a while - would you support me doing this so we can make our communications more professional?"

          Win-win!



          There will be industries that have more slack time. Some consulting companies, for example, have downtime between contracts. You can do the above then too, just phrased more like, "I would love to do X in the future, we have a bit of a downtime now, what do you think about me spending some time learning X? It'll add value to me and let us do Y/Z in the future."







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Oct 9 '15 at 15:07









          Elysian Fields♦

          96.8k46292449




          96.8k46292449











          • My problem is that I see it as a win-win, but my supervisors see it as I win, they lose. I can't be too specific, but they think that what I want to learn may apply to my profession in general, but doesn't apply to the company. Sorry for venting out, but it's a dire issue for me.
            – Mickael Caruso
            Oct 9 '15 at 17:17







          • 1




            ...please don't use Photoshop to create textual documents.
            – Yamikuronue
            Oct 9 '15 at 21:27






          • 1




            @MickaelCaruso Then if you can't phrase it in such a way that makes them see it as a win-win..... I'd say you shouldn't do it. They TOLD you you shouldn't. It's pretty clear at that point, no?
            – Patrice
            Oct 9 '15 at 21:50










          • @MickaelCaruso then what I wrote here means you are doing that wrong. It's not just "seeing it as win-win" but it's communicating that it's win-win to your supervisors.
            – Elysian Fields♦
            Oct 9 '15 at 22:05






          • 2




            @Yamikuronue Photoshop does a much better job of handling the kerning for all of the Papyrus font work the documents need.
            – Cort Ammon
            Oct 10 '15 at 20:15
















          • My problem is that I see it as a win-win, but my supervisors see it as I win, they lose. I can't be too specific, but they think that what I want to learn may apply to my profession in general, but doesn't apply to the company. Sorry for venting out, but it's a dire issue for me.
            – Mickael Caruso
            Oct 9 '15 at 17:17







          • 1




            ...please don't use Photoshop to create textual documents.
            – Yamikuronue
            Oct 9 '15 at 21:27






          • 1




            @MickaelCaruso Then if you can't phrase it in such a way that makes them see it as a win-win..... I'd say you shouldn't do it. They TOLD you you shouldn't. It's pretty clear at that point, no?
            – Patrice
            Oct 9 '15 at 21:50










          • @MickaelCaruso then what I wrote here means you are doing that wrong. It's not just "seeing it as win-win" but it's communicating that it's win-win to your supervisors.
            – Elysian Fields♦
            Oct 9 '15 at 22:05






          • 2




            @Yamikuronue Photoshop does a much better job of handling the kerning for all of the Papyrus font work the documents need.
            – Cort Ammon
            Oct 10 '15 at 20:15















          My problem is that I see it as a win-win, but my supervisors see it as I win, they lose. I can't be too specific, but they think that what I want to learn may apply to my profession in general, but doesn't apply to the company. Sorry for venting out, but it's a dire issue for me.
          – Mickael Caruso
          Oct 9 '15 at 17:17





          My problem is that I see it as a win-win, but my supervisors see it as I win, they lose. I can't be too specific, but they think that what I want to learn may apply to my profession in general, but doesn't apply to the company. Sorry for venting out, but it's a dire issue for me.
          – Mickael Caruso
          Oct 9 '15 at 17:17





          1




          1




          ...please don't use Photoshop to create textual documents.
          – Yamikuronue
          Oct 9 '15 at 21:27




          ...please don't use Photoshop to create textual documents.
          – Yamikuronue
          Oct 9 '15 at 21:27




          1




          1




          @MickaelCaruso Then if you can't phrase it in such a way that makes them see it as a win-win..... I'd say you shouldn't do it. They TOLD you you shouldn't. It's pretty clear at that point, no?
          – Patrice
          Oct 9 '15 at 21:50




          @MickaelCaruso Then if you can't phrase it in such a way that makes them see it as a win-win..... I'd say you shouldn't do it. They TOLD you you shouldn't. It's pretty clear at that point, no?
          – Patrice
          Oct 9 '15 at 21:50












          @MickaelCaruso then what I wrote here means you are doing that wrong. It's not just "seeing it as win-win" but it's communicating that it's win-win to your supervisors.
          – Elysian Fields♦
          Oct 9 '15 at 22:05




          @MickaelCaruso then what I wrote here means you are doing that wrong. It's not just "seeing it as win-win" but it's communicating that it's win-win to your supervisors.
          – Elysian Fields♦
          Oct 9 '15 at 22:05




          2




          2




          @Yamikuronue Photoshop does a much better job of handling the kerning for all of the Papyrus font work the documents need.
          – Cort Ammon
          Oct 10 '15 at 20:15




          @Yamikuronue Photoshop does a much better job of handling the kerning for all of the Papyrus font work the documents need.
          – Cort Ammon
          Oct 10 '15 at 20:15










          up vote
          9
          down vote













          Definitely YES



          If the learning would benefit your career and help you perform better at your role, then it is definitely ethical to learn after your work (or in your free time).



          But, if it is for your own benefit which does not benefit the company, then NO.



          For example, if I am a data scientist:



          Can I learn data science technologies like Spark in my spare time or after work <-- YES



          Can I learn photoshop? <-- NO It doesn't help you improve at your current role. You might want to do it at home.






          share|improve this answer




















          • This is incorrect - Nobody can predict the future nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role.
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:35










          • @EdHeal I have to disagree. Nobody can predict the future ** YES **nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role. PARTIALLY YES. But, I guess there is a definite line which can be drawn to say whether the skill is important for the skill or no. For example, photography skill is definitely not useful for a programming career. So, learning it at office, is wrong.
            – Dawny33
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:41











          • You are correct - my comment should have a clause within reason. However, photography may be useful skill for a web developer to learn?!
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:43










          • - PS - Read up about TRIZ
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:44














          up vote
          9
          down vote













          Definitely YES



          If the learning would benefit your career and help you perform better at your role, then it is definitely ethical to learn after your work (or in your free time).



          But, if it is for your own benefit which does not benefit the company, then NO.



          For example, if I am a data scientist:



          Can I learn data science technologies like Spark in my spare time or after work <-- YES



          Can I learn photoshop? <-- NO It doesn't help you improve at your current role. You might want to do it at home.






          share|improve this answer




















          • This is incorrect - Nobody can predict the future nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role.
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:35










          • @EdHeal I have to disagree. Nobody can predict the future ** YES **nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role. PARTIALLY YES. But, I guess there is a definite line which can be drawn to say whether the skill is important for the skill or no. For example, photography skill is definitely not useful for a programming career. So, learning it at office, is wrong.
            – Dawny33
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:41











          • You are correct - my comment should have a clause within reason. However, photography may be useful skill for a web developer to learn?!
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:43










          • - PS - Read up about TRIZ
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:44












          up vote
          9
          down vote










          up vote
          9
          down vote









          Definitely YES



          If the learning would benefit your career and help you perform better at your role, then it is definitely ethical to learn after your work (or in your free time).



          But, if it is for your own benefit which does not benefit the company, then NO.



          For example, if I am a data scientist:



          Can I learn data science technologies like Spark in my spare time or after work <-- YES



          Can I learn photoshop? <-- NO It doesn't help you improve at your current role. You might want to do it at home.






          share|improve this answer












          Definitely YES



          If the learning would benefit your career and help you perform better at your role, then it is definitely ethical to learn after your work (or in your free time).



          But, if it is for your own benefit which does not benefit the company, then NO.



          For example, if I am a data scientist:



          Can I learn data science technologies like Spark in my spare time or after work <-- YES



          Can I learn photoshop? <-- NO It doesn't help you improve at your current role. You might want to do it at home.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Oct 9 '15 at 14:39









          Dawny33

          12.2k34563




          12.2k34563











          • This is incorrect - Nobody can predict the future nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role.
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:35










          • @EdHeal I have to disagree. Nobody can predict the future ** YES **nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role. PARTIALLY YES. But, I guess there is a definite line which can be drawn to say whether the skill is important for the skill or no. For example, photography skill is definitely not useful for a programming career. So, learning it at office, is wrong.
            – Dawny33
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:41











          • You are correct - my comment should have a clause within reason. However, photography may be useful skill for a web developer to learn?!
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:43










          • - PS - Read up about TRIZ
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:44
















          • This is incorrect - Nobody can predict the future nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role.
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:35










          • @EdHeal I have to disagree. Nobody can predict the future ** YES **nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role. PARTIALLY YES. But, I guess there is a definite line which can be drawn to say whether the skill is important for the skill or no. For example, photography skill is definitely not useful for a programming career. So, learning it at office, is wrong.
            – Dawny33
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:41











          • You are correct - my comment should have a clause within reason. However, photography may be useful skill for a web developer to learn?!
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:43










          • - PS - Read up about TRIZ
            – Ed Heal
            Oct 10 '15 at 9:44















          This is incorrect - Nobody can predict the future nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role.
          – Ed Heal
          Oct 10 '15 at 9:35




          This is incorrect - Nobody can predict the future nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role.
          – Ed Heal
          Oct 10 '15 at 9:35












          @EdHeal I have to disagree. Nobody can predict the future ** YES **nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role. PARTIALLY YES. But, I guess there is a definite line which can be drawn to say whether the skill is important for the skill or no. For example, photography skill is definitely not useful for a programming career. So, learning it at office, is wrong.
          – Dawny33
          Oct 10 '15 at 9:41





          @EdHeal I have to disagree. Nobody can predict the future ** YES **nor what skills may be learned that can be transferred to the current role. PARTIALLY YES. But, I guess there is a definite line which can be drawn to say whether the skill is important for the skill or no. For example, photography skill is definitely not useful for a programming career. So, learning it at office, is wrong.
          – Dawny33
          Oct 10 '15 at 9:41













          You are correct - my comment should have a clause within reason. However, photography may be useful skill for a web developer to learn?!
          – Ed Heal
          Oct 10 '15 at 9:43




          You are correct - my comment should have a clause within reason. However, photography may be useful skill for a web developer to learn?!
          – Ed Heal
          Oct 10 '15 at 9:43












          - PS - Read up about TRIZ
          – Ed Heal
          Oct 10 '15 at 9:44




          - PS - Read up about TRIZ
          – Ed Heal
          Oct 10 '15 at 9:44










          up vote
          3
          down vote













          As long as you aren't using up non-trivial consumables, are getting your work done, and are not interfering with the operation/competitiveness of your employer, you absolutely are justified in performing self-directed career development activities whenever you can get away with it.



          MANY successful people got their start when they were bored at work and decided to do something about it. These folks usually do NOT "ask for permission" from their boss to do things like trying out an idea by way of a prototype, some writing, calculations or a design, or business plan. Smart bosses see this as initiative.



          Just do it-- you probably won't get fired unless they want to get rid of you anyway and need a reason.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 2




            I like to think that the saying "It is easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission" with this whole thing. Yes, I have slipped a lot of modern practices into our company because I see how effective and efficient they are. My boss doesn't like it and specifically told me that "it's not the way we do things here, you work for this company, not for the profession." This isn't the end. I have to learn as long as I meet my objectives.
            – Mickael Caruso
            Oct 13 '15 at 13:05










          • @MickaelCaruso, that's right, this is a long game. Your boss won't always be your boss. Nor is he necessarily interested in developing talent. Your career is in your hands.
            – teego1967
            Oct 13 '15 at 13:36











          • This. I started to teach myself how to program (which has since led to a career) when I was bored at work. I kept thinking, "Why am I doing these tasks? A computer could do them so much faster". Within 2-3 months, I was writing scripts (hacky, terrible scripts, in retrospect) that were helping the company out, and my boss gave me a 50% raise.
            – David Brandtz
            Oct 13 '15 at 16:18














          up vote
          3
          down vote













          As long as you aren't using up non-trivial consumables, are getting your work done, and are not interfering with the operation/competitiveness of your employer, you absolutely are justified in performing self-directed career development activities whenever you can get away with it.



          MANY successful people got their start when they were bored at work and decided to do something about it. These folks usually do NOT "ask for permission" from their boss to do things like trying out an idea by way of a prototype, some writing, calculations or a design, or business plan. Smart bosses see this as initiative.



          Just do it-- you probably won't get fired unless they want to get rid of you anyway and need a reason.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 2




            I like to think that the saying "It is easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission" with this whole thing. Yes, I have slipped a lot of modern practices into our company because I see how effective and efficient they are. My boss doesn't like it and specifically told me that "it's not the way we do things here, you work for this company, not for the profession." This isn't the end. I have to learn as long as I meet my objectives.
            – Mickael Caruso
            Oct 13 '15 at 13:05










          • @MickaelCaruso, that's right, this is a long game. Your boss won't always be your boss. Nor is he necessarily interested in developing talent. Your career is in your hands.
            – teego1967
            Oct 13 '15 at 13:36











          • This. I started to teach myself how to program (which has since led to a career) when I was bored at work. I kept thinking, "Why am I doing these tasks? A computer could do them so much faster". Within 2-3 months, I was writing scripts (hacky, terrible scripts, in retrospect) that were helping the company out, and my boss gave me a 50% raise.
            – David Brandtz
            Oct 13 '15 at 16:18












          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          As long as you aren't using up non-trivial consumables, are getting your work done, and are not interfering with the operation/competitiveness of your employer, you absolutely are justified in performing self-directed career development activities whenever you can get away with it.



          MANY successful people got their start when they were bored at work and decided to do something about it. These folks usually do NOT "ask for permission" from their boss to do things like trying out an idea by way of a prototype, some writing, calculations or a design, or business plan. Smart bosses see this as initiative.



          Just do it-- you probably won't get fired unless they want to get rid of you anyway and need a reason.






          share|improve this answer












          As long as you aren't using up non-trivial consumables, are getting your work done, and are not interfering with the operation/competitiveness of your employer, you absolutely are justified in performing self-directed career development activities whenever you can get away with it.



          MANY successful people got their start when they were bored at work and decided to do something about it. These folks usually do NOT "ask for permission" from their boss to do things like trying out an idea by way of a prototype, some writing, calculations or a design, or business plan. Smart bosses see this as initiative.



          Just do it-- you probably won't get fired unless they want to get rid of you anyway and need a reason.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Oct 13 '15 at 12:59









          teego1967

          10.3k42845




          10.3k42845







          • 2




            I like to think that the saying "It is easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission" with this whole thing. Yes, I have slipped a lot of modern practices into our company because I see how effective and efficient they are. My boss doesn't like it and specifically told me that "it's not the way we do things here, you work for this company, not for the profession." This isn't the end. I have to learn as long as I meet my objectives.
            – Mickael Caruso
            Oct 13 '15 at 13:05










          • @MickaelCaruso, that's right, this is a long game. Your boss won't always be your boss. Nor is he necessarily interested in developing talent. Your career is in your hands.
            – teego1967
            Oct 13 '15 at 13:36











          • This. I started to teach myself how to program (which has since led to a career) when I was bored at work. I kept thinking, "Why am I doing these tasks? A computer could do them so much faster". Within 2-3 months, I was writing scripts (hacky, terrible scripts, in retrospect) that were helping the company out, and my boss gave me a 50% raise.
            – David Brandtz
            Oct 13 '15 at 16:18












          • 2




            I like to think that the saying "It is easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission" with this whole thing. Yes, I have slipped a lot of modern practices into our company because I see how effective and efficient they are. My boss doesn't like it and specifically told me that "it's not the way we do things here, you work for this company, not for the profession." This isn't the end. I have to learn as long as I meet my objectives.
            – Mickael Caruso
            Oct 13 '15 at 13:05










          • @MickaelCaruso, that's right, this is a long game. Your boss won't always be your boss. Nor is he necessarily interested in developing talent. Your career is in your hands.
            – teego1967
            Oct 13 '15 at 13:36











          • This. I started to teach myself how to program (which has since led to a career) when I was bored at work. I kept thinking, "Why am I doing these tasks? A computer could do them so much faster". Within 2-3 months, I was writing scripts (hacky, terrible scripts, in retrospect) that were helping the company out, and my boss gave me a 50% raise.
            – David Brandtz
            Oct 13 '15 at 16:18







          2




          2




          I like to think that the saying "It is easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission" with this whole thing. Yes, I have slipped a lot of modern practices into our company because I see how effective and efficient they are. My boss doesn't like it and specifically told me that "it's not the way we do things here, you work for this company, not for the profession." This isn't the end. I have to learn as long as I meet my objectives.
          – Mickael Caruso
          Oct 13 '15 at 13:05




          I like to think that the saying "It is easier to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission" with this whole thing. Yes, I have slipped a lot of modern practices into our company because I see how effective and efficient they are. My boss doesn't like it and specifically told me that "it's not the way we do things here, you work for this company, not for the profession." This isn't the end. I have to learn as long as I meet my objectives.
          – Mickael Caruso
          Oct 13 '15 at 13:05












          @MickaelCaruso, that's right, this is a long game. Your boss won't always be your boss. Nor is he necessarily interested in developing talent. Your career is in your hands.
          – teego1967
          Oct 13 '15 at 13:36





          @MickaelCaruso, that's right, this is a long game. Your boss won't always be your boss. Nor is he necessarily interested in developing talent. Your career is in your hands.
          – teego1967
          Oct 13 '15 at 13:36













          This. I started to teach myself how to program (which has since led to a career) when I was bored at work. I kept thinking, "Why am I doing these tasks? A computer could do them so much faster". Within 2-3 months, I was writing scripts (hacky, terrible scripts, in retrospect) that were helping the company out, and my boss gave me a 50% raise.
          – David Brandtz
          Oct 13 '15 at 16:18




          This. I started to teach myself how to program (which has since led to a career) when I was bored at work. I kept thinking, "Why am I doing these tasks? A computer could do them so much faster". Within 2-3 months, I was writing scripts (hacky, terrible scripts, in retrospect) that were helping the company out, and my boss gave me a 50% raise.
          – David Brandtz
          Oct 13 '15 at 16:18










          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Many modern jobs are more project based than time based, but it's ultimately up to your employer. I would say it it all right if you're getting things done and if you're doing company things on your time. The lines of being "on the job" can get blurry.



          I recall a lawyer saying, "If you're in the shower thinking about a client, it's billable."



          This should open a dialog with your boss so you can find out what her expectations are and possible additional things you can learn to benefit the company and hopefully help your career as well.






          share|improve this answer
























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Many modern jobs are more project based than time based, but it's ultimately up to your employer. I would say it it all right if you're getting things done and if you're doing company things on your time. The lines of being "on the job" can get blurry.



            I recall a lawyer saying, "If you're in the shower thinking about a client, it's billable."



            This should open a dialog with your boss so you can find out what her expectations are and possible additional things you can learn to benefit the company and hopefully help your career as well.






            share|improve this answer






















              up vote
              1
              down vote










              up vote
              1
              down vote









              Many modern jobs are more project based than time based, but it's ultimately up to your employer. I would say it it all right if you're getting things done and if you're doing company things on your time. The lines of being "on the job" can get blurry.



              I recall a lawyer saying, "If you're in the shower thinking about a client, it's billable."



              This should open a dialog with your boss so you can find out what her expectations are and possible additional things you can learn to benefit the company and hopefully help your career as well.






              share|improve this answer












              Many modern jobs are more project based than time based, but it's ultimately up to your employer. I would say it it all right if you're getting things done and if you're doing company things on your time. The lines of being "on the job" can get blurry.



              I recall a lawyer saying, "If you're in the shower thinking about a client, it's billable."



              This should open a dialog with your boss so you can find out what her expectations are and possible additional things you can learn to benefit the company and hopefully help your career as well.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Oct 9 '15 at 20:44







              user8365



























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote














                  So, is it alright then, to do some learning to improve oneself, on
                  company time, even for the company's benefit (again, because your
                  employer is unable or unwilling to provide means for your professional
                  advancement)?




                  If you ask your boss for permission to "do some learning on company time" and you get consent, then it is perfectly alright to proceed with your learning.




                  To complicate things: What if your boss says "no, don't learn that
                  because that's not and never going to be how we do things here?" If
                  you don't, you'd be following instructions, though you could be
                  sacrificing your marketability.




                  That doesn't complicate things at all - they become extremely simple in this case.



                  In this case, you have been expressly forbidden from spending company time learning. In this case if you value your job you will not do so. Instead, learn on your own time.



                  Easy.






                  share|improve this answer




















                  • It's easy because they told me straight up not on company time. But that is my struggle. I have very little time for learning outside work.
                    – Mickael Caruso
                    Oct 10 '15 at 13:05










                  • I do find some time, albeit inadequate, but I take it.
                    – Mickael Caruso
                    Oct 11 '15 at 11:37














                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote














                  So, is it alright then, to do some learning to improve oneself, on
                  company time, even for the company's benefit (again, because your
                  employer is unable or unwilling to provide means for your professional
                  advancement)?




                  If you ask your boss for permission to "do some learning on company time" and you get consent, then it is perfectly alright to proceed with your learning.




                  To complicate things: What if your boss says "no, don't learn that
                  because that's not and never going to be how we do things here?" If
                  you don't, you'd be following instructions, though you could be
                  sacrificing your marketability.




                  That doesn't complicate things at all - they become extremely simple in this case.



                  In this case, you have been expressly forbidden from spending company time learning. In this case if you value your job you will not do so. Instead, learn on your own time.



                  Easy.






                  share|improve this answer




















                  • It's easy because they told me straight up not on company time. But that is my struggle. I have very little time for learning outside work.
                    – Mickael Caruso
                    Oct 10 '15 at 13:05










                  • I do find some time, albeit inadequate, but I take it.
                    – Mickael Caruso
                    Oct 11 '15 at 11:37












                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  So, is it alright then, to do some learning to improve oneself, on
                  company time, even for the company's benefit (again, because your
                  employer is unable or unwilling to provide means for your professional
                  advancement)?




                  If you ask your boss for permission to "do some learning on company time" and you get consent, then it is perfectly alright to proceed with your learning.




                  To complicate things: What if your boss says "no, don't learn that
                  because that's not and never going to be how we do things here?" If
                  you don't, you'd be following instructions, though you could be
                  sacrificing your marketability.




                  That doesn't complicate things at all - they become extremely simple in this case.



                  In this case, you have been expressly forbidden from spending company time learning. In this case if you value your job you will not do so. Instead, learn on your own time.



                  Easy.






                  share|improve this answer













                  So, is it alright then, to do some learning to improve oneself, on
                  company time, even for the company's benefit (again, because your
                  employer is unable or unwilling to provide means for your professional
                  advancement)?




                  If you ask your boss for permission to "do some learning on company time" and you get consent, then it is perfectly alright to proceed with your learning.




                  To complicate things: What if your boss says "no, don't learn that
                  because that's not and never going to be how we do things here?" If
                  you don't, you'd be following instructions, though you could be
                  sacrificing your marketability.




                  That doesn't complicate things at all - they become extremely simple in this case.



                  In this case, you have been expressly forbidden from spending company time learning. In this case if you value your job you will not do so. Instead, learn on your own time.



                  Easy.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Oct 10 '15 at 1:05









                  Joe Strazzere

                  223k104653921




                  223k104653921











                  • It's easy because they told me straight up not on company time. But that is my struggle. I have very little time for learning outside work.
                    – Mickael Caruso
                    Oct 10 '15 at 13:05










                  • I do find some time, albeit inadequate, but I take it.
                    – Mickael Caruso
                    Oct 11 '15 at 11:37
















                  • It's easy because they told me straight up not on company time. But that is my struggle. I have very little time for learning outside work.
                    – Mickael Caruso
                    Oct 10 '15 at 13:05










                  • I do find some time, albeit inadequate, but I take it.
                    – Mickael Caruso
                    Oct 11 '15 at 11:37















                  It's easy because they told me straight up not on company time. But that is my struggle. I have very little time for learning outside work.
                  – Mickael Caruso
                  Oct 10 '15 at 13:05




                  It's easy because they told me straight up not on company time. But that is my struggle. I have very little time for learning outside work.
                  – Mickael Caruso
                  Oct 10 '15 at 13:05












                  I do find some time, albeit inadequate, but I take it.
                  – Mickael Caruso
                  Oct 11 '15 at 11:37




                  I do find some time, albeit inadequate, but I take it.
                  – Mickael Caruso
                  Oct 11 '15 at 11:37










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  There was an ethics class where I mentioned hiding things as a symptom something is wrong in a relationship--not that we should openly do bad things, but the question of whether something is done without the faintest attempt to hide it; if you're hiding your dealings with another from your spouse, that's a red flag. You are not obligated to catalogue every interaction with every person you meet, but if you start hoping or acting so that your spouse doesn't learn of certain interactions, there's probably something wrong.



                  There are some kinds of legitimate secrets to hold--a surprise birthday party, for instance, but then the question comes of, "What if the other person found out?" If despite your best efforts your spouse finds you were attempting to orchestrate a nice surprise birthday party for them, they will unlikely be furious. A hair of the wrong color on your collar is a slightly different matter.



                  The professor suggested that secrecy / hiding / withholding information is a noteworthy red flag not just in relationships but in ethics in general.



                  I don't think you need to get explicit approval for every self-training, but I would try to be on the same page as your employer. This could mean no self-training, but if you are doing all your work, many bosses will see self-training on top of that as increasing your value to the company. So don't sneak it and feel guilty; ask your boss about general expectations and self-train in ways where you are on the same page as your boss.






                  share|improve this answer
























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    There was an ethics class where I mentioned hiding things as a symptom something is wrong in a relationship--not that we should openly do bad things, but the question of whether something is done without the faintest attempt to hide it; if you're hiding your dealings with another from your spouse, that's a red flag. You are not obligated to catalogue every interaction with every person you meet, but if you start hoping or acting so that your spouse doesn't learn of certain interactions, there's probably something wrong.



                    There are some kinds of legitimate secrets to hold--a surprise birthday party, for instance, but then the question comes of, "What if the other person found out?" If despite your best efforts your spouse finds you were attempting to orchestrate a nice surprise birthday party for them, they will unlikely be furious. A hair of the wrong color on your collar is a slightly different matter.



                    The professor suggested that secrecy / hiding / withholding information is a noteworthy red flag not just in relationships but in ethics in general.



                    I don't think you need to get explicit approval for every self-training, but I would try to be on the same page as your employer. This could mean no self-training, but if you are doing all your work, many bosses will see self-training on top of that as increasing your value to the company. So don't sneak it and feel guilty; ask your boss about general expectations and self-train in ways where you are on the same page as your boss.






                    share|improve this answer






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote









                      There was an ethics class where I mentioned hiding things as a symptom something is wrong in a relationship--not that we should openly do bad things, but the question of whether something is done without the faintest attempt to hide it; if you're hiding your dealings with another from your spouse, that's a red flag. You are not obligated to catalogue every interaction with every person you meet, but if you start hoping or acting so that your spouse doesn't learn of certain interactions, there's probably something wrong.



                      There are some kinds of legitimate secrets to hold--a surprise birthday party, for instance, but then the question comes of, "What if the other person found out?" If despite your best efforts your spouse finds you were attempting to orchestrate a nice surprise birthday party for them, they will unlikely be furious. A hair of the wrong color on your collar is a slightly different matter.



                      The professor suggested that secrecy / hiding / withholding information is a noteworthy red flag not just in relationships but in ethics in general.



                      I don't think you need to get explicit approval for every self-training, but I would try to be on the same page as your employer. This could mean no self-training, but if you are doing all your work, many bosses will see self-training on top of that as increasing your value to the company. So don't sneak it and feel guilty; ask your boss about general expectations and self-train in ways where you are on the same page as your boss.






                      share|improve this answer












                      There was an ethics class where I mentioned hiding things as a symptom something is wrong in a relationship--not that we should openly do bad things, but the question of whether something is done without the faintest attempt to hide it; if you're hiding your dealings with another from your spouse, that's a red flag. You are not obligated to catalogue every interaction with every person you meet, but if you start hoping or acting so that your spouse doesn't learn of certain interactions, there's probably something wrong.



                      There are some kinds of legitimate secrets to hold--a surprise birthday party, for instance, but then the question comes of, "What if the other person found out?" If despite your best efforts your spouse finds you were attempting to orchestrate a nice surprise birthday party for them, they will unlikely be furious. A hair of the wrong color on your collar is a slightly different matter.



                      The professor suggested that secrecy / hiding / withholding information is a noteworthy red flag not just in relationships but in ethics in general.



                      I don't think you need to get explicit approval for every self-training, but I would try to be on the same page as your employer. This could mean no self-training, but if you are doing all your work, many bosses will see self-training on top of that as increasing your value to the company. So don't sneak it and feel guilty; ask your boss about general expectations and self-train in ways where you are on the same page as your boss.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Oct 10 '15 at 20:07









                      JonathanHayward

                      9251722




                      9251722




















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          Different companies have different cultures about how acceptable this is. However, if your current boss has directly told you not to learn something on company time, then you are at risk of being fired if you do so. Once a boss has forbidden an action, then don't do it. You say you view it as a win-win, but clearly your boss does not and his opinion matters more than yours as far as what you spend your time on at work. If you genuinely think it is a win for the company then make the business case, but the boss is the final decider and you need to accept that gracefully if he decides against what you want.



                          Find something acceptable to your boss to do during down time. It might be a language that you need more depth in that the company currently uses. It might be creating a proposal for some new system you would like to implement. It might be learning more about the business domain. It might be cleaning out old file cabinets! The company owns your time during the work day, it's their choice what they want to pay for.



                          If you want to get qualified for things your company does not use or intend to use, then do that on your own time. It is the same as if I decided I wanted to be a doctor, you wouldn't expect my current company to pay for a qualification like that that they get no direct benefit from would you? Learning a tool that they don't use is useless to them and they are entitled to decide not to pay for it. There are always things you can learn that will help in your current job.






                          share|improve this answer


























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote













                            Different companies have different cultures about how acceptable this is. However, if your current boss has directly told you not to learn something on company time, then you are at risk of being fired if you do so. Once a boss has forbidden an action, then don't do it. You say you view it as a win-win, but clearly your boss does not and his opinion matters more than yours as far as what you spend your time on at work. If you genuinely think it is a win for the company then make the business case, but the boss is the final decider and you need to accept that gracefully if he decides against what you want.



                            Find something acceptable to your boss to do during down time. It might be a language that you need more depth in that the company currently uses. It might be creating a proposal for some new system you would like to implement. It might be learning more about the business domain. It might be cleaning out old file cabinets! The company owns your time during the work day, it's their choice what they want to pay for.



                            If you want to get qualified for things your company does not use or intend to use, then do that on your own time. It is the same as if I decided I wanted to be a doctor, you wouldn't expect my current company to pay for a qualification like that that they get no direct benefit from would you? Learning a tool that they don't use is useless to them and they are entitled to decide not to pay for it. There are always things you can learn that will help in your current job.






                            share|improve this answer
























                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote









                              Different companies have different cultures about how acceptable this is. However, if your current boss has directly told you not to learn something on company time, then you are at risk of being fired if you do so. Once a boss has forbidden an action, then don't do it. You say you view it as a win-win, but clearly your boss does not and his opinion matters more than yours as far as what you spend your time on at work. If you genuinely think it is a win for the company then make the business case, but the boss is the final decider and you need to accept that gracefully if he decides against what you want.



                              Find something acceptable to your boss to do during down time. It might be a language that you need more depth in that the company currently uses. It might be creating a proposal for some new system you would like to implement. It might be learning more about the business domain. It might be cleaning out old file cabinets! The company owns your time during the work day, it's their choice what they want to pay for.



                              If you want to get qualified for things your company does not use or intend to use, then do that on your own time. It is the same as if I decided I wanted to be a doctor, you wouldn't expect my current company to pay for a qualification like that that they get no direct benefit from would you? Learning a tool that they don't use is useless to them and they are entitled to decide not to pay for it. There are always things you can learn that will help in your current job.






                              share|improve this answer














                              Different companies have different cultures about how acceptable this is. However, if your current boss has directly told you not to learn something on company time, then you are at risk of being fired if you do so. Once a boss has forbidden an action, then don't do it. You say you view it as a win-win, but clearly your boss does not and his opinion matters more than yours as far as what you spend your time on at work. If you genuinely think it is a win for the company then make the business case, but the boss is the final decider and you need to accept that gracefully if he decides against what you want.



                              Find something acceptable to your boss to do during down time. It might be a language that you need more depth in that the company currently uses. It might be creating a proposal for some new system you would like to implement. It might be learning more about the business domain. It might be cleaning out old file cabinets! The company owns your time during the work day, it's their choice what they want to pay for.



                              If you want to get qualified for things your company does not use or intend to use, then do that on your own time. It is the same as if I decided I wanted to be a doctor, you wouldn't expect my current company to pay for a qualification like that that they get no direct benefit from would you? Learning a tool that they don't use is useless to them and they are entitled to decide not to pay for it. There are always things you can learn that will help in your current job.







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Oct 12 '15 at 12:50

























                              answered Oct 9 '15 at 19:44









                              HLGEM

                              133k25226489




                              133k25226489




















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  • Is there something else you could usefully do in your current (or similar) role such as perhaps helping a colleague. "Finding something to do" work, essentially?


                                  • Is there something else you could do to benefit the company, such as learn a useful related technology or skill?


                                  • When asking your manager if there's anything further he'd like you to do, what was his response?


                                  • Can you find anything useful to do: review documents, vacuum the hall, clean the kitchen?


                                  If you've answered no to all the above, then you truly have nothing useful to provide the company at the present time and I wouldn't see a problem with doing something non-company-related: however you shouldn't just do this off your own back.



                                  Go and discuss it with your manager, explain the situation and ask how he'd like you to use your time: charity or open source work, for example. If he still has no response, ask if you can undertake some personal projects.



                                  Even then, I'd still try to avoid making money on someone else's time: can you find a personal development project which has a soft benefit to you (learning a skill you may find useful later, learning a foreign language, researching interesting technology etc) and if possible a potential benefit to the employer.



                                  Try to avoid tasks that would directly make you money.






                                  share|improve this answer
























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    • Is there something else you could usefully do in your current (or similar) role such as perhaps helping a colleague. "Finding something to do" work, essentially?


                                    • Is there something else you could do to benefit the company, such as learn a useful related technology or skill?


                                    • When asking your manager if there's anything further he'd like you to do, what was his response?


                                    • Can you find anything useful to do: review documents, vacuum the hall, clean the kitchen?


                                    If you've answered no to all the above, then you truly have nothing useful to provide the company at the present time and I wouldn't see a problem with doing something non-company-related: however you shouldn't just do this off your own back.



                                    Go and discuss it with your manager, explain the situation and ask how he'd like you to use your time: charity or open source work, for example. If he still has no response, ask if you can undertake some personal projects.



                                    Even then, I'd still try to avoid making money on someone else's time: can you find a personal development project which has a soft benefit to you (learning a skill you may find useful later, learning a foreign language, researching interesting technology etc) and if possible a potential benefit to the employer.



                                    Try to avoid tasks that would directly make you money.






                                    share|improve this answer






















                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      • Is there something else you could usefully do in your current (or similar) role such as perhaps helping a colleague. "Finding something to do" work, essentially?


                                      • Is there something else you could do to benefit the company, such as learn a useful related technology or skill?


                                      • When asking your manager if there's anything further he'd like you to do, what was his response?


                                      • Can you find anything useful to do: review documents, vacuum the hall, clean the kitchen?


                                      If you've answered no to all the above, then you truly have nothing useful to provide the company at the present time and I wouldn't see a problem with doing something non-company-related: however you shouldn't just do this off your own back.



                                      Go and discuss it with your manager, explain the situation and ask how he'd like you to use your time: charity or open source work, for example. If he still has no response, ask if you can undertake some personal projects.



                                      Even then, I'd still try to avoid making money on someone else's time: can you find a personal development project which has a soft benefit to you (learning a skill you may find useful later, learning a foreign language, researching interesting technology etc) and if possible a potential benefit to the employer.



                                      Try to avoid tasks that would directly make you money.






                                      share|improve this answer












                                      • Is there something else you could usefully do in your current (or similar) role such as perhaps helping a colleague. "Finding something to do" work, essentially?


                                      • Is there something else you could do to benefit the company, such as learn a useful related technology or skill?


                                      • When asking your manager if there's anything further he'd like you to do, what was his response?


                                      • Can you find anything useful to do: review documents, vacuum the hall, clean the kitchen?


                                      If you've answered no to all the above, then you truly have nothing useful to provide the company at the present time and I wouldn't see a problem with doing something non-company-related: however you shouldn't just do this off your own back.



                                      Go and discuss it with your manager, explain the situation and ask how he'd like you to use your time: charity or open source work, for example. If he still has no response, ask if you can undertake some personal projects.



                                      Even then, I'd still try to avoid making money on someone else's time: can you find a personal development project which has a soft benefit to you (learning a skill you may find useful later, learning a foreign language, researching interesting technology etc) and if possible a potential benefit to the employer.



                                      Try to avoid tasks that would directly make you money.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered Oct 9 '15 at 15:03









                                      Jon Story

                                      6,49022045




                                      6,49022045












                                          Comments

                                          Post a Comment

                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          What does second last employer means? [closed]

                                          Image
                                          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address...
                                          Read more

                                          List of Gilmore Girls characters

                                          Image
                                          The season three cast—(Back row): Lane, Michel, Paris, Emily, Richard, Sookie, Miss Patty, Kirk; Front row: Jess, Luke, Lorelai, Rory, Dean This is a list of characters for the comedy-drama television series Gilmore Girls . Contents 1 Main characters 1.1 Lorelai Gilmore 1.2 Rory Gilmore 1.3 Sookie St. James 1.4 Lane Kim 1.5 Michel Gerard 1.6 Luke Danes 1.7 Emily Gilmore 1.8 Richard Gilmore 1.9 Paris Geller 1.10 Dean Forester 1.11 Jess Mariano 1.12 Kirk Gleason 1.13 Jason Stiles 1.14 Logan Huntzberger 2 Major recurring characters 2.1 Christopher Hayden 2.2 Jackson Belleville 2.3 Mrs. Kim 2.4 Tristin DuGray 2.5 Max Medina 2.6 Taylor Doose 2.7 Dave Rygalski 2.8 Marty 3 Recurring characters 3.1 Stars Hollow 3.2 Chilton 3.3 Yale 3.4 Other 4 Notable guest stars 5 Unseen characters 6 Notes 7 References Main characters Actor Character Appearances Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Season 4 Season 5 Season 6 Season 7 A Year in the Life Lauren Graham Lorelai Gilmore...
                                          Read more

                                          Confectionery

                                          Image
                                          Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of ...
                                          Read more