Want to negotiate pay raise even though I'm leaving in six months

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
51
down vote

favorite
2












I've successfully completed my first year and a bit and am scheduled for my yearly performance review. During it I'd like to open negotiations for a pay raise. However, I'm planning on moving to a different state in about half a year. My employer doesn't know this, but I'm thinking that I'd still like to negotiate a raise based on my performance, which my boss and I already agree is great.



Is this unethical? Tacky? Ill-advised? Am I selling myself based on future value that I know they will not receive and am therefore committing a type of fraud?







share|improve this question


















  • 45




    Why should you be underpaid for another 6 months? Can they promise you in writing you'll have a job any longer than that?
    – user8365
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:26






  • 17




    This is the part of capitalism where your expected to be ruthless.
    – Mark Rogers
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:33






  • 28




    @MarkRogers I wouldn't say "ruthless". This is the part of capitalism where you recognize the role of prices in allocating scarce resources with alternative uses.
    – mikeazo
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:59






  • 16




    @MarkRogers you're*
    – Insane
    Mar 3 '16 at 4:57






  • 3




    Is it ethical that you and your colleagues are not paid the same (before asking: in general, no you are not)? Is it ethical that you work off 40 hours when you know our optimum is 30 hrs? Is it ethical that ....? Business in general is not ethical, and generally, life is unfair. Should you ever be in a situation of resignation, grab a Zen book :)
    – phresnel
    Mar 3 '16 at 10:01
















up vote
51
down vote

favorite
2












I've successfully completed my first year and a bit and am scheduled for my yearly performance review. During it I'd like to open negotiations for a pay raise. However, I'm planning on moving to a different state in about half a year. My employer doesn't know this, but I'm thinking that I'd still like to negotiate a raise based on my performance, which my boss and I already agree is great.



Is this unethical? Tacky? Ill-advised? Am I selling myself based on future value that I know they will not receive and am therefore committing a type of fraud?







share|improve this question


















  • 45




    Why should you be underpaid for another 6 months? Can they promise you in writing you'll have a job any longer than that?
    – user8365
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:26






  • 17




    This is the part of capitalism where your expected to be ruthless.
    – Mark Rogers
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:33






  • 28




    @MarkRogers I wouldn't say "ruthless". This is the part of capitalism where you recognize the role of prices in allocating scarce resources with alternative uses.
    – mikeazo
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:59






  • 16




    @MarkRogers you're*
    – Insane
    Mar 3 '16 at 4:57






  • 3




    Is it ethical that you and your colleagues are not paid the same (before asking: in general, no you are not)? Is it ethical that you work off 40 hours when you know our optimum is 30 hrs? Is it ethical that ....? Business in general is not ethical, and generally, life is unfair. Should you ever be in a situation of resignation, grab a Zen book :)
    – phresnel
    Mar 3 '16 at 10:01












up vote
51
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
51
down vote

favorite
2






2





I've successfully completed my first year and a bit and am scheduled for my yearly performance review. During it I'd like to open negotiations for a pay raise. However, I'm planning on moving to a different state in about half a year. My employer doesn't know this, but I'm thinking that I'd still like to negotiate a raise based on my performance, which my boss and I already agree is great.



Is this unethical? Tacky? Ill-advised? Am I selling myself based on future value that I know they will not receive and am therefore committing a type of fraud?







share|improve this question














I've successfully completed my first year and a bit and am scheduled for my yearly performance review. During it I'd like to open negotiations for a pay raise. However, I'm planning on moving to a different state in about half a year. My employer doesn't know this, but I'm thinking that I'd still like to negotiate a raise based on my performance, which my boss and I already agree is great.



Is this unethical? Tacky? Ill-advised? Am I selling myself based on future value that I know they will not receive and am therefore committing a type of fraud?









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 2 '16 at 17:57









sirdank

1445




1445










asked Mar 2 '16 at 13:17









IAE

42657




42657







  • 45




    Why should you be underpaid for another 6 months? Can they promise you in writing you'll have a job any longer than that?
    – user8365
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:26






  • 17




    This is the part of capitalism where your expected to be ruthless.
    – Mark Rogers
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:33






  • 28




    @MarkRogers I wouldn't say "ruthless". This is the part of capitalism where you recognize the role of prices in allocating scarce resources with alternative uses.
    – mikeazo
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:59






  • 16




    @MarkRogers you're*
    – Insane
    Mar 3 '16 at 4:57






  • 3




    Is it ethical that you and your colleagues are not paid the same (before asking: in general, no you are not)? Is it ethical that you work off 40 hours when you know our optimum is 30 hrs? Is it ethical that ....? Business in general is not ethical, and generally, life is unfair. Should you ever be in a situation of resignation, grab a Zen book :)
    – phresnel
    Mar 3 '16 at 10:01












  • 45




    Why should you be underpaid for another 6 months? Can they promise you in writing you'll have a job any longer than that?
    – user8365
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:26






  • 17




    This is the part of capitalism where your expected to be ruthless.
    – Mark Rogers
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:33






  • 28




    @MarkRogers I wouldn't say "ruthless". This is the part of capitalism where you recognize the role of prices in allocating scarce resources with alternative uses.
    – mikeazo
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:59






  • 16




    @MarkRogers you're*
    – Insane
    Mar 3 '16 at 4:57






  • 3




    Is it ethical that you and your colleagues are not paid the same (before asking: in general, no you are not)? Is it ethical that you work off 40 hours when you know our optimum is 30 hrs? Is it ethical that ....? Business in general is not ethical, and generally, life is unfair. Should you ever be in a situation of resignation, grab a Zen book :)
    – phresnel
    Mar 3 '16 at 10:01







45




45




Why should you be underpaid for another 6 months? Can they promise you in writing you'll have a job any longer than that?
– user8365
Mar 2 '16 at 17:26




Why should you be underpaid for another 6 months? Can they promise you in writing you'll have a job any longer than that?
– user8365
Mar 2 '16 at 17:26




17




17




This is the part of capitalism where your expected to be ruthless.
– Mark Rogers
Mar 2 '16 at 17:33




This is the part of capitalism where your expected to be ruthless.
– Mark Rogers
Mar 2 '16 at 17:33




28




28




@MarkRogers I wouldn't say "ruthless". This is the part of capitalism where you recognize the role of prices in allocating scarce resources with alternative uses.
– mikeazo
Mar 2 '16 at 18:59




@MarkRogers I wouldn't say "ruthless". This is the part of capitalism where you recognize the role of prices in allocating scarce resources with alternative uses.
– mikeazo
Mar 2 '16 at 18:59




16




16




@MarkRogers you're*
– Insane
Mar 3 '16 at 4:57




@MarkRogers you're*
– Insane
Mar 3 '16 at 4:57




3




3




Is it ethical that you and your colleagues are not paid the same (before asking: in general, no you are not)? Is it ethical that you work off 40 hours when you know our optimum is 30 hrs? Is it ethical that ....? Business in general is not ethical, and generally, life is unfair. Should you ever be in a situation of resignation, grab a Zen book :)
– phresnel
Mar 3 '16 at 10:01




Is it ethical that you and your colleagues are not paid the same (before asking: in general, no you are not)? Is it ethical that you work off 40 hours when you know our optimum is 30 hrs? Is it ethical that ....? Business in general is not ethical, and generally, life is unfair. Should you ever be in a situation of resignation, grab a Zen book :)
– phresnel
Mar 3 '16 at 10:01










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
121
down vote














Is this unethical? Tacky? Ill-advised? Am I selling myself based on
future value that I know they will not receive and am therefore
committing a type of fraud?




No, it's not unethical, tacky, or ill-advised. And it's certainly not fraud.



Whenever you are in a performance review, it's a good time to seek a raise. In many shops, an annual raise is pretty much automatic anyway.



And while you are planning to move "in about half a year", you don't know what will actually happen that far off.



You might decide not to move. You might decide to move sometime further in the future. You might even decide to move and see if you can continue working for your current employer (in a different division, or perhaps even remotely).



I believe everyone should see if they can get a raise every time they are having their performance reviewed, unless they have already publicly announced their departure. To me, this is just good business.



It's important to get your current salary as high as you can if you are planning to seek new employment. Employers often base their offer on your most recent salary. Having a higher starting point adds up over the years.






share|improve this answer


















  • 16




    +1 Good advice, Joe. I've been rebuilding my career after a stroke. I found out the hard way that your last salary determines your next.
    – Richard U
    Mar 2 '16 at 13:29






  • 29




    I would add to this that even if you had concrete plans and definitely do move, why cheat yourself out of 6 months of higher pay?
    – Doyle Lewis
    Mar 2 '16 at 14:09






  • 6




    I don't get why leaving would have any effect on this decision. The raise is decided based on the value you already showed the previous year. Which means it simply adjust the value you are already putting into those hours, and they give you a raise because the employer recognizes this. So it's completely independent of how much time you're going to work for that employer.
    – Bakuriu
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:20






  • 25




    Yeah I've been "planning on moving" from my current job for a few years now. SOON.
    – Andrew Whatever
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:25






  • 5




    Your final salary is a loud statement of your value to that employer and, alas, to society overall. Wish it were otherwise. Since it ain't, maximize it.
    – DudleyM
    Mar 3 '16 at 3:34

















up vote
4
down vote













The only thing that would make it unethical is if you negotiate with "if you don't give me a pay-rise, I will look for another job". That should be treated as a commitment to stay for at least a year (unless there is a significant change in your circumstances - eg a partner moving to another state).



However, if you go in with "I think I've done pretty well over the last year, do you agree I am due a rise?", there isn't a problem.






share|improve this answer




















  • Surely that's just down to your own conscience, it isn't actually unethical, things change and people's priorities as well. You may not intend to stay beyond 6 months, but your example is about the poster saying they will leave immediately if they don't get the rise, bluffing that is worse than agreeing to stay and leaving after 6 months, happens to people who accept counter offers all the time.
    – The Wandering Dev Manager
    Mar 3 '16 at 13:39

















up vote
2
down vote













This only becomes unethical (or worse) if the condition for your pay-rise is you extending your term, implied or otherwise. Examples:



  • Taking on additional responsibilities for completing finite projects that will clearly take longer than 6m.

  • Explicitly signing or saying you'll be there for an amount of time when you wont.

  • As Martin says, using a hypothetical move as an explicit catalyst for the negotiation.

Otherwise just consider it as negotiating for your pay for the next 6 months. Just because you currently think you might not be there next year, doesn't mean your time up until your departure needs to be capped as penance.



Well beside the point that if they give you a rise it may make you reconsider what happens in 6 months. You may demand more money from your next post. You may decide it's better staying put.






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: false,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62942%2fwant-to-negotiate-pay-raise-even-though-im-leaving-in-six-months%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

























    StackExchange.ready(function ()
    $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
    var showEditor = function()
    $("#show-editor-button").hide();
    $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
    StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
    ;

    var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
    if(useFancy == 'True')
    var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
    var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
    var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

    $(this).loadPopup(
    url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
    loaded: function(popup)
    var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
    var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
    var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

    pTitle.text(popupTitle);
    pBody.html(popupBody);
    pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

    )
    else
    var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
    if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
    showEditor();


    );
    );






    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    121
    down vote














    Is this unethical? Tacky? Ill-advised? Am I selling myself based on
    future value that I know they will not receive and am therefore
    committing a type of fraud?




    No, it's not unethical, tacky, or ill-advised. And it's certainly not fraud.



    Whenever you are in a performance review, it's a good time to seek a raise. In many shops, an annual raise is pretty much automatic anyway.



    And while you are planning to move "in about half a year", you don't know what will actually happen that far off.



    You might decide not to move. You might decide to move sometime further in the future. You might even decide to move and see if you can continue working for your current employer (in a different division, or perhaps even remotely).



    I believe everyone should see if they can get a raise every time they are having their performance reviewed, unless they have already publicly announced their departure. To me, this is just good business.



    It's important to get your current salary as high as you can if you are planning to seek new employment. Employers often base their offer on your most recent salary. Having a higher starting point adds up over the years.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 16




      +1 Good advice, Joe. I've been rebuilding my career after a stroke. I found out the hard way that your last salary determines your next.
      – Richard U
      Mar 2 '16 at 13:29






    • 29




      I would add to this that even if you had concrete plans and definitely do move, why cheat yourself out of 6 months of higher pay?
      – Doyle Lewis
      Mar 2 '16 at 14:09






    • 6




      I don't get why leaving would have any effect on this decision. The raise is decided based on the value you already showed the previous year. Which means it simply adjust the value you are already putting into those hours, and they give you a raise because the employer recognizes this. So it's completely independent of how much time you're going to work for that employer.
      – Bakuriu
      Mar 2 '16 at 17:20






    • 25




      Yeah I've been "planning on moving" from my current job for a few years now. SOON.
      – Andrew Whatever
      Mar 2 '16 at 18:25






    • 5




      Your final salary is a loud statement of your value to that employer and, alas, to society overall. Wish it were otherwise. Since it ain't, maximize it.
      – DudleyM
      Mar 3 '16 at 3:34














    up vote
    121
    down vote














    Is this unethical? Tacky? Ill-advised? Am I selling myself based on
    future value that I know they will not receive and am therefore
    committing a type of fraud?




    No, it's not unethical, tacky, or ill-advised. And it's certainly not fraud.



    Whenever you are in a performance review, it's a good time to seek a raise. In many shops, an annual raise is pretty much automatic anyway.



    And while you are planning to move "in about half a year", you don't know what will actually happen that far off.



    You might decide not to move. You might decide to move sometime further in the future. You might even decide to move and see if you can continue working for your current employer (in a different division, or perhaps even remotely).



    I believe everyone should see if they can get a raise every time they are having their performance reviewed, unless they have already publicly announced their departure. To me, this is just good business.



    It's important to get your current salary as high as you can if you are planning to seek new employment. Employers often base their offer on your most recent salary. Having a higher starting point adds up over the years.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 16




      +1 Good advice, Joe. I've been rebuilding my career after a stroke. I found out the hard way that your last salary determines your next.
      – Richard U
      Mar 2 '16 at 13:29






    • 29




      I would add to this that even if you had concrete plans and definitely do move, why cheat yourself out of 6 months of higher pay?
      – Doyle Lewis
      Mar 2 '16 at 14:09






    • 6




      I don't get why leaving would have any effect on this decision. The raise is decided based on the value you already showed the previous year. Which means it simply adjust the value you are already putting into those hours, and they give you a raise because the employer recognizes this. So it's completely independent of how much time you're going to work for that employer.
      – Bakuriu
      Mar 2 '16 at 17:20






    • 25




      Yeah I've been "planning on moving" from my current job for a few years now. SOON.
      – Andrew Whatever
      Mar 2 '16 at 18:25






    • 5




      Your final salary is a loud statement of your value to that employer and, alas, to society overall. Wish it were otherwise. Since it ain't, maximize it.
      – DudleyM
      Mar 3 '16 at 3:34












    up vote
    121
    down vote










    up vote
    121
    down vote










    Is this unethical? Tacky? Ill-advised? Am I selling myself based on
    future value that I know they will not receive and am therefore
    committing a type of fraud?




    No, it's not unethical, tacky, or ill-advised. And it's certainly not fraud.



    Whenever you are in a performance review, it's a good time to seek a raise. In many shops, an annual raise is pretty much automatic anyway.



    And while you are planning to move "in about half a year", you don't know what will actually happen that far off.



    You might decide not to move. You might decide to move sometime further in the future. You might even decide to move and see if you can continue working for your current employer (in a different division, or perhaps even remotely).



    I believe everyone should see if they can get a raise every time they are having their performance reviewed, unless they have already publicly announced their departure. To me, this is just good business.



    It's important to get your current salary as high as you can if you are planning to seek new employment. Employers often base their offer on your most recent salary. Having a higher starting point adds up over the years.






    share|improve this answer















    Is this unethical? Tacky? Ill-advised? Am I selling myself based on
    future value that I know they will not receive and am therefore
    committing a type of fraud?




    No, it's not unethical, tacky, or ill-advised. And it's certainly not fraud.



    Whenever you are in a performance review, it's a good time to seek a raise. In many shops, an annual raise is pretty much automatic anyway.



    And while you are planning to move "in about half a year", you don't know what will actually happen that far off.



    You might decide not to move. You might decide to move sometime further in the future. You might even decide to move and see if you can continue working for your current employer (in a different division, or perhaps even remotely).



    I believe everyone should see if they can get a raise every time they are having their performance reviewed, unless they have already publicly announced their departure. To me, this is just good business.



    It's important to get your current salary as high as you can if you are planning to seek new employment. Employers often base their offer on your most recent salary. Having a higher starting point adds up over the years.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 5 '16 at 17:39

























    answered Mar 2 '16 at 13:26









    Joe Strazzere

    222k103649914




    222k103649914







    • 16




      +1 Good advice, Joe. I've been rebuilding my career after a stroke. I found out the hard way that your last salary determines your next.
      – Richard U
      Mar 2 '16 at 13:29






    • 29




      I would add to this that even if you had concrete plans and definitely do move, why cheat yourself out of 6 months of higher pay?
      – Doyle Lewis
      Mar 2 '16 at 14:09






    • 6




      I don't get why leaving would have any effect on this decision. The raise is decided based on the value you already showed the previous year. Which means it simply adjust the value you are already putting into those hours, and they give you a raise because the employer recognizes this. So it's completely independent of how much time you're going to work for that employer.
      – Bakuriu
      Mar 2 '16 at 17:20






    • 25




      Yeah I've been "planning on moving" from my current job for a few years now. SOON.
      – Andrew Whatever
      Mar 2 '16 at 18:25






    • 5




      Your final salary is a loud statement of your value to that employer and, alas, to society overall. Wish it were otherwise. Since it ain't, maximize it.
      – DudleyM
      Mar 3 '16 at 3:34












    • 16




      +1 Good advice, Joe. I've been rebuilding my career after a stroke. I found out the hard way that your last salary determines your next.
      – Richard U
      Mar 2 '16 at 13:29






    • 29




      I would add to this that even if you had concrete plans and definitely do move, why cheat yourself out of 6 months of higher pay?
      – Doyle Lewis
      Mar 2 '16 at 14:09






    • 6




      I don't get why leaving would have any effect on this decision. The raise is decided based on the value you already showed the previous year. Which means it simply adjust the value you are already putting into those hours, and they give you a raise because the employer recognizes this. So it's completely independent of how much time you're going to work for that employer.
      – Bakuriu
      Mar 2 '16 at 17:20






    • 25




      Yeah I've been "planning on moving" from my current job for a few years now. SOON.
      – Andrew Whatever
      Mar 2 '16 at 18:25






    • 5




      Your final salary is a loud statement of your value to that employer and, alas, to society overall. Wish it were otherwise. Since it ain't, maximize it.
      – DudleyM
      Mar 3 '16 at 3:34







    16




    16




    +1 Good advice, Joe. I've been rebuilding my career after a stroke. I found out the hard way that your last salary determines your next.
    – Richard U
    Mar 2 '16 at 13:29




    +1 Good advice, Joe. I've been rebuilding my career after a stroke. I found out the hard way that your last salary determines your next.
    – Richard U
    Mar 2 '16 at 13:29




    29




    29




    I would add to this that even if you had concrete plans and definitely do move, why cheat yourself out of 6 months of higher pay?
    – Doyle Lewis
    Mar 2 '16 at 14:09




    I would add to this that even if you had concrete plans and definitely do move, why cheat yourself out of 6 months of higher pay?
    – Doyle Lewis
    Mar 2 '16 at 14:09




    6




    6




    I don't get why leaving would have any effect on this decision. The raise is decided based on the value you already showed the previous year. Which means it simply adjust the value you are already putting into those hours, and they give you a raise because the employer recognizes this. So it's completely independent of how much time you're going to work for that employer.
    – Bakuriu
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:20




    I don't get why leaving would have any effect on this decision. The raise is decided based on the value you already showed the previous year. Which means it simply adjust the value you are already putting into those hours, and they give you a raise because the employer recognizes this. So it's completely independent of how much time you're going to work for that employer.
    – Bakuriu
    Mar 2 '16 at 17:20




    25




    25




    Yeah I've been "planning on moving" from my current job for a few years now. SOON.
    – Andrew Whatever
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:25




    Yeah I've been "planning on moving" from my current job for a few years now. SOON.
    – Andrew Whatever
    Mar 2 '16 at 18:25




    5




    5




    Your final salary is a loud statement of your value to that employer and, alas, to society overall. Wish it were otherwise. Since it ain't, maximize it.
    – DudleyM
    Mar 3 '16 at 3:34




    Your final salary is a loud statement of your value to that employer and, alas, to society overall. Wish it were otherwise. Since it ain't, maximize it.
    – DudleyM
    Mar 3 '16 at 3:34












    up vote
    4
    down vote













    The only thing that would make it unethical is if you negotiate with "if you don't give me a pay-rise, I will look for another job". That should be treated as a commitment to stay for at least a year (unless there is a significant change in your circumstances - eg a partner moving to another state).



    However, if you go in with "I think I've done pretty well over the last year, do you agree I am due a rise?", there isn't a problem.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Surely that's just down to your own conscience, it isn't actually unethical, things change and people's priorities as well. You may not intend to stay beyond 6 months, but your example is about the poster saying they will leave immediately if they don't get the rise, bluffing that is worse than agreeing to stay and leaving after 6 months, happens to people who accept counter offers all the time.
      – The Wandering Dev Manager
      Mar 3 '16 at 13:39














    up vote
    4
    down vote













    The only thing that would make it unethical is if you negotiate with "if you don't give me a pay-rise, I will look for another job". That should be treated as a commitment to stay for at least a year (unless there is a significant change in your circumstances - eg a partner moving to another state).



    However, if you go in with "I think I've done pretty well over the last year, do you agree I am due a rise?", there isn't a problem.






    share|improve this answer




















    • Surely that's just down to your own conscience, it isn't actually unethical, things change and people's priorities as well. You may not intend to stay beyond 6 months, but your example is about the poster saying they will leave immediately if they don't get the rise, bluffing that is worse than agreeing to stay and leaving after 6 months, happens to people who accept counter offers all the time.
      – The Wandering Dev Manager
      Mar 3 '16 at 13:39












    up vote
    4
    down vote










    up vote
    4
    down vote









    The only thing that would make it unethical is if you negotiate with "if you don't give me a pay-rise, I will look for another job". That should be treated as a commitment to stay for at least a year (unless there is a significant change in your circumstances - eg a partner moving to another state).



    However, if you go in with "I think I've done pretty well over the last year, do you agree I am due a rise?", there isn't a problem.






    share|improve this answer












    The only thing that would make it unethical is if you negotiate with "if you don't give me a pay-rise, I will look for another job". That should be treated as a commitment to stay for at least a year (unless there is a significant change in your circumstances - eg a partner moving to another state).



    However, if you go in with "I think I've done pretty well over the last year, do you agree I am due a rise?", there isn't a problem.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 3 '16 at 13:24









    Martin Bonner

    1,3441613




    1,3441613











    • Surely that's just down to your own conscience, it isn't actually unethical, things change and people's priorities as well. You may not intend to stay beyond 6 months, but your example is about the poster saying they will leave immediately if they don't get the rise, bluffing that is worse than agreeing to stay and leaving after 6 months, happens to people who accept counter offers all the time.
      – The Wandering Dev Manager
      Mar 3 '16 at 13:39
















    • Surely that's just down to your own conscience, it isn't actually unethical, things change and people's priorities as well. You may not intend to stay beyond 6 months, but your example is about the poster saying they will leave immediately if they don't get the rise, bluffing that is worse than agreeing to stay and leaving after 6 months, happens to people who accept counter offers all the time.
      – The Wandering Dev Manager
      Mar 3 '16 at 13:39















    Surely that's just down to your own conscience, it isn't actually unethical, things change and people's priorities as well. You may not intend to stay beyond 6 months, but your example is about the poster saying they will leave immediately if they don't get the rise, bluffing that is worse than agreeing to stay and leaving after 6 months, happens to people who accept counter offers all the time.
    – The Wandering Dev Manager
    Mar 3 '16 at 13:39




    Surely that's just down to your own conscience, it isn't actually unethical, things change and people's priorities as well. You may not intend to stay beyond 6 months, but your example is about the poster saying they will leave immediately if they don't get the rise, bluffing that is worse than agreeing to stay and leaving after 6 months, happens to people who accept counter offers all the time.
    – The Wandering Dev Manager
    Mar 3 '16 at 13:39










    up vote
    2
    down vote













    This only becomes unethical (or worse) if the condition for your pay-rise is you extending your term, implied or otherwise. Examples:



    • Taking on additional responsibilities for completing finite projects that will clearly take longer than 6m.

    • Explicitly signing or saying you'll be there for an amount of time when you wont.

    • As Martin says, using a hypothetical move as an explicit catalyst for the negotiation.

    Otherwise just consider it as negotiating for your pay for the next 6 months. Just because you currently think you might not be there next year, doesn't mean your time up until your departure needs to be capped as penance.



    Well beside the point that if they give you a rise it may make you reconsider what happens in 6 months. You may demand more money from your next post. You may decide it's better staying put.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      This only becomes unethical (or worse) if the condition for your pay-rise is you extending your term, implied or otherwise. Examples:



      • Taking on additional responsibilities for completing finite projects that will clearly take longer than 6m.

      • Explicitly signing or saying you'll be there for an amount of time when you wont.

      • As Martin says, using a hypothetical move as an explicit catalyst for the negotiation.

      Otherwise just consider it as negotiating for your pay for the next 6 months. Just because you currently think you might not be there next year, doesn't mean your time up until your departure needs to be capped as penance.



      Well beside the point that if they give you a rise it may make you reconsider what happens in 6 months. You may demand more money from your next post. You may decide it's better staying put.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        This only becomes unethical (or worse) if the condition for your pay-rise is you extending your term, implied or otherwise. Examples:



        • Taking on additional responsibilities for completing finite projects that will clearly take longer than 6m.

        • Explicitly signing or saying you'll be there for an amount of time when you wont.

        • As Martin says, using a hypothetical move as an explicit catalyst for the negotiation.

        Otherwise just consider it as negotiating for your pay for the next 6 months. Just because you currently think you might not be there next year, doesn't mean your time up until your departure needs to be capped as penance.



        Well beside the point that if they give you a rise it may make you reconsider what happens in 6 months. You may demand more money from your next post. You may decide it's better staying put.






        share|improve this answer












        This only becomes unethical (or worse) if the condition for your pay-rise is you extending your term, implied or otherwise. Examples:



        • Taking on additional responsibilities for completing finite projects that will clearly take longer than 6m.

        • Explicitly signing or saying you'll be there for an amount of time when you wont.

        • As Martin says, using a hypothetical move as an explicit catalyst for the negotiation.

        Otherwise just consider it as negotiating for your pay for the next 6 months. Just because you currently think you might not be there next year, doesn't mean your time up until your departure needs to be capped as penance.



        Well beside the point that if they give you a rise it may make you reconsider what happens in 6 months. You may demand more money from your next post. You may decide it's better staying put.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 3 '16 at 15:01









        Oli

        851412




        851412






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62942%2fwant-to-negotiate-pay-raise-even-though-im-leaving-in-six-months%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            One-line joke