Is it appropriate to send the reference letter if not asked?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Nearly a month ago I had an interview at company A, but since at that time I was working for another company they said to let them know if, at the end of my working period for company B, I was still interested in working for them.



Now my working period at company B is ended, therefore I contacted company A to tell them I was willing to work for them if there was still the possibility (they had interviews with other people in the meanwhile). I never got an answer.



Yesterday my old boss sent me the reference letter I asked her to write.
Since the letter is very positive, I think it might help me in "convincing" company B to give me an apportunity. So, should I send the letter to company B although they never answered my first email?
If yes, how can I explain it since they never asked me for a reference letter?







share|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Nearly a month ago I had an interview at company A, but since at that time I was working for another company they said to let them know if, at the end of my working period for company B, I was still interested in working for them.



    Now my working period at company B is ended, therefore I contacted company A to tell them I was willing to work for them if there was still the possibility (they had interviews with other people in the meanwhile). I never got an answer.



    Yesterday my old boss sent me the reference letter I asked her to write.
    Since the letter is very positive, I think it might help me in "convincing" company B to give me an apportunity. So, should I send the letter to company B although they never answered my first email?
    If yes, how can I explain it since they never asked me for a reference letter?







    share|improve this question






















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Nearly a month ago I had an interview at company A, but since at that time I was working for another company they said to let them know if, at the end of my working period for company B, I was still interested in working for them.



      Now my working period at company B is ended, therefore I contacted company A to tell them I was willing to work for them if there was still the possibility (they had interviews with other people in the meanwhile). I never got an answer.



      Yesterday my old boss sent me the reference letter I asked her to write.
      Since the letter is very positive, I think it might help me in "convincing" company B to give me an apportunity. So, should I send the letter to company B although they never answered my first email?
      If yes, how can I explain it since they never asked me for a reference letter?







      share|improve this question












      Nearly a month ago I had an interview at company A, but since at that time I was working for another company they said to let them know if, at the end of my working period for company B, I was still interested in working for them.



      Now my working period at company B is ended, therefore I contacted company A to tell them I was willing to work for them if there was still the possibility (they had interviews with other people in the meanwhile). I never got an answer.



      Yesterday my old boss sent me the reference letter I asked her to write.
      Since the letter is very positive, I think it might help me in "convincing" company B to give me an apportunity. So, should I send the letter to company B although they never answered my first email?
      If yes, how can I explain it since they never asked me for a reference letter?









      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 13 '16 at 14:33









      Rhei

      1364




      1364




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The 95+% chance is that company A has filled the position they were hiring for, so it doesn't matter how good you or your reference letter are, they're not going to hire you now. "Keep in touch" is just a thing that companies say - a lot of the time, it doesn't mean anything.



          On the other hand, it probably wouldn't do any harm to send another mail of some sort; worst case is that they'll just delete it. However, if they've already interviewed you, a reference letter, no matter how positive it is, isn't going to change very much - I'd trust what I saw in an interview over a letter from someone I don't know every single time.






          share|improve this answer




















          • Your last sentence is true, but what about skills like problem solving, independence, team work etc.? You cannot actually understand if a person has those skills from an interview, that's why I thought it might be useful to give them the opinion of my previous boss.
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:32










          • I think I can make a better estimate of those factors than I'll get from a reference - "war stories" tell an interviewer a lot.
            – Philip Kendall
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15






          • 2




            If they can't determine that in an interview, you need to pokish your resume and your interview skills. Even if they don't ask directly, you can chooss examples to give them which showcase these skills.
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Don't overwork your references. Protecting them from unnecessary work is one of the reasons to provide them only upon request.






          share|improve this answer




















          • I was thinking to add the reference letter at the end of my CV, but according to what you wrote it is not a good idea, is it?
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:19










          • A company prefers to get the reference letter directly, rather than through you, to make sure it really is the reference's opinion and hasn't been forged or tampered with... so you wouldn't be saving them much work and may be creating more work for your reference, since you're encouraging the company to check even if they aren't seriously interested in you. Unless you've got a reference saying "This guy is far better than his grades suggest and you really don't want to pass uo the chance to hire him" -- which almost never happems -- standard practice is "references upon request."
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:13










          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "423"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62038%2fis-it-appropriate-to-send-the-reference-letter-if-not-asked%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The 95+% chance is that company A has filled the position they were hiring for, so it doesn't matter how good you or your reference letter are, they're not going to hire you now. "Keep in touch" is just a thing that companies say - a lot of the time, it doesn't mean anything.



          On the other hand, it probably wouldn't do any harm to send another mail of some sort; worst case is that they'll just delete it. However, if they've already interviewed you, a reference letter, no matter how positive it is, isn't going to change very much - I'd trust what I saw in an interview over a letter from someone I don't know every single time.






          share|improve this answer




















          • Your last sentence is true, but what about skills like problem solving, independence, team work etc.? You cannot actually understand if a person has those skills from an interview, that's why I thought it might be useful to give them the opinion of my previous boss.
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:32










          • I think I can make a better estimate of those factors than I'll get from a reference - "war stories" tell an interviewer a lot.
            – Philip Kendall
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15






          • 2




            If they can't determine that in an interview, you need to pokish your resume and your interview skills. Even if they don't ask directly, you can chooss examples to give them which showcase these skills.
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15














          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The 95+% chance is that company A has filled the position they were hiring for, so it doesn't matter how good you or your reference letter are, they're not going to hire you now. "Keep in touch" is just a thing that companies say - a lot of the time, it doesn't mean anything.



          On the other hand, it probably wouldn't do any harm to send another mail of some sort; worst case is that they'll just delete it. However, if they've already interviewed you, a reference letter, no matter how positive it is, isn't going to change very much - I'd trust what I saw in an interview over a letter from someone I don't know every single time.






          share|improve this answer




















          • Your last sentence is true, but what about skills like problem solving, independence, team work etc.? You cannot actually understand if a person has those skills from an interview, that's why I thought it might be useful to give them the opinion of my previous boss.
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:32










          • I think I can make a better estimate of those factors than I'll get from a reference - "war stories" tell an interviewer a lot.
            – Philip Kendall
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15






          • 2




            If they can't determine that in an interview, you need to pokish your resume and your interview skills. Even if they don't ask directly, you can chooss examples to give them which showcase these skills.
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15












          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          The 95+% chance is that company A has filled the position they were hiring for, so it doesn't matter how good you or your reference letter are, they're not going to hire you now. "Keep in touch" is just a thing that companies say - a lot of the time, it doesn't mean anything.



          On the other hand, it probably wouldn't do any harm to send another mail of some sort; worst case is that they'll just delete it. However, if they've already interviewed you, a reference letter, no matter how positive it is, isn't going to change very much - I'd trust what I saw in an interview over a letter from someone I don't know every single time.






          share|improve this answer












          The 95+% chance is that company A has filled the position they were hiring for, so it doesn't matter how good you or your reference letter are, they're not going to hire you now. "Keep in touch" is just a thing that companies say - a lot of the time, it doesn't mean anything.



          On the other hand, it probably wouldn't do any harm to send another mail of some sort; worst case is that they'll just delete it. However, if they've already interviewed you, a reference letter, no matter how positive it is, isn't going to change very much - I'd trust what I saw in an interview over a letter from someone I don't know every single time.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Feb 13 '16 at 14:46









          Philip Kendall

          40.8k27105135




          40.8k27105135











          • Your last sentence is true, but what about skills like problem solving, independence, team work etc.? You cannot actually understand if a person has those skills from an interview, that's why I thought it might be useful to give them the opinion of my previous boss.
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:32










          • I think I can make a better estimate of those factors than I'll get from a reference - "war stories" tell an interviewer a lot.
            – Philip Kendall
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15






          • 2




            If they can't determine that in an interview, you need to pokish your resume and your interview skills. Even if they don't ask directly, you can chooss examples to give them which showcase these skills.
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15
















          • Your last sentence is true, but what about skills like problem solving, independence, team work etc.? You cannot actually understand if a person has those skills from an interview, that's why I thought it might be useful to give them the opinion of my previous boss.
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:32










          • I think I can make a better estimate of those factors than I'll get from a reference - "war stories" tell an interviewer a lot.
            – Philip Kendall
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15






          • 2




            If they can't determine that in an interview, you need to pokish your resume and your interview skills. Even if they don't ask directly, you can chooss examples to give them which showcase these skills.
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:15















          Your last sentence is true, but what about skills like problem solving, independence, team work etc.? You cannot actually understand if a person has those skills from an interview, that's why I thought it might be useful to give them the opinion of my previous boss.
          – Rhei
          Feb 15 '16 at 12:32




          Your last sentence is true, but what about skills like problem solving, independence, team work etc.? You cannot actually understand if a person has those skills from an interview, that's why I thought it might be useful to give them the opinion of my previous boss.
          – Rhei
          Feb 15 '16 at 12:32












          I think I can make a better estimate of those factors than I'll get from a reference - "war stories" tell an interviewer a lot.
          – Philip Kendall
          Feb 15 '16 at 13:15




          I think I can make a better estimate of those factors than I'll get from a reference - "war stories" tell an interviewer a lot.
          – Philip Kendall
          Feb 15 '16 at 13:15




          2




          2




          If they can't determine that in an interview, you need to pokish your resume and your interview skills. Even if they don't ask directly, you can chooss examples to give them which showcase these skills.
          – keshlam
          Feb 15 '16 at 13:15




          If they can't determine that in an interview, you need to pokish your resume and your interview skills. Even if they don't ask directly, you can chooss examples to give them which showcase these skills.
          – keshlam
          Feb 15 '16 at 13:15












          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Don't overwork your references. Protecting them from unnecessary work is one of the reasons to provide them only upon request.






          share|improve this answer




















          • I was thinking to add the reference letter at the end of my CV, but according to what you wrote it is not a good idea, is it?
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:19










          • A company prefers to get the reference letter directly, rather than through you, to make sure it really is the reference's opinion and hasn't been forged or tampered with... so you wouldn't be saving them much work and may be creating more work for your reference, since you're encouraging the company to check even if they aren't seriously interested in you. Unless you've got a reference saying "This guy is far better than his grades suggest and you really don't want to pass uo the chance to hire him" -- which almost never happems -- standard practice is "references upon request."
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:13














          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Don't overwork your references. Protecting them from unnecessary work is one of the reasons to provide them only upon request.






          share|improve this answer




















          • I was thinking to add the reference letter at the end of my CV, but according to what you wrote it is not a good idea, is it?
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:19










          • A company prefers to get the reference letter directly, rather than through you, to make sure it really is the reference's opinion and hasn't been forged or tampered with... so you wouldn't be saving them much work and may be creating more work for your reference, since you're encouraging the company to check even if they aren't seriously interested in you. Unless you've got a reference saying "This guy is far better than his grades suggest and you really don't want to pass uo the chance to hire him" -- which almost never happems -- standard practice is "references upon request."
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:13












          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          Don't overwork your references. Protecting them from unnecessary work is one of the reasons to provide them only upon request.






          share|improve this answer












          Don't overwork your references. Protecting them from unnecessary work is one of the reasons to provide them only upon request.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Feb 13 '16 at 21:46









          keshlam

          41.5k1267144




          41.5k1267144











          • I was thinking to add the reference letter at the end of my CV, but according to what you wrote it is not a good idea, is it?
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:19










          • A company prefers to get the reference letter directly, rather than through you, to make sure it really is the reference's opinion and hasn't been forged or tampered with... so you wouldn't be saving them much work and may be creating more work for your reference, since you're encouraging the company to check even if they aren't seriously interested in you. Unless you've got a reference saying "This guy is far better than his grades suggest and you really don't want to pass uo the chance to hire him" -- which almost never happems -- standard practice is "references upon request."
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:13
















          • I was thinking to add the reference letter at the end of my CV, but according to what you wrote it is not a good idea, is it?
            – Rhei
            Feb 15 '16 at 12:19










          • A company prefers to get the reference letter directly, rather than through you, to make sure it really is the reference's opinion and hasn't been forged or tampered with... so you wouldn't be saving them much work and may be creating more work for your reference, since you're encouraging the company to check even if they aren't seriously interested in you. Unless you've got a reference saying "This guy is far better than his grades suggest and you really don't want to pass uo the chance to hire him" -- which almost never happems -- standard practice is "references upon request."
            – keshlam
            Feb 15 '16 at 13:13















          I was thinking to add the reference letter at the end of my CV, but according to what you wrote it is not a good idea, is it?
          – Rhei
          Feb 15 '16 at 12:19




          I was thinking to add the reference letter at the end of my CV, but according to what you wrote it is not a good idea, is it?
          – Rhei
          Feb 15 '16 at 12:19












          A company prefers to get the reference letter directly, rather than through you, to make sure it really is the reference's opinion and hasn't been forged or tampered with... so you wouldn't be saving them much work and may be creating more work for your reference, since you're encouraging the company to check even if they aren't seriously interested in you. Unless you've got a reference saying "This guy is far better than his grades suggest and you really don't want to pass uo the chance to hire him" -- which almost never happems -- standard practice is "references upon request."
          – keshlam
          Feb 15 '16 at 13:13




          A company prefers to get the reference letter directly, rather than through you, to make sure it really is the reference's opinion and hasn't been forged or tampered with... so you wouldn't be saving them much work and may be creating more work for your reference, since you're encouraging the company to check even if they aren't seriously interested in you. Unless you've got a reference saying "This guy is far better than his grades suggest and you really don't want to pass uo the chance to hire him" -- which almost never happems -- standard practice is "references upon request."
          – keshlam
          Feb 15 '16 at 13:13












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f62038%2fis-it-appropriate-to-send-the-reference-letter-if-not-asked%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

          Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

          Confectionery