Is it ok to offer cash to a colleague to do a task that I do not want to do?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
15
down vote

favorite
1












I was given this task that hardly anyone wants to do and is so boring. It is also on a boundary of my expertise. The DB gives some general recommendations when I tell him politely that I am stuck with it. Hiring a contractor is not an option.



I am so frustrated about it that I would happily pay cash to another guy who is good at it, but assigned to more urgent stuff at the moment. At the same time I feel that it may be looked at as something inappropriate. Although I do not see which policy it may violate (gift policy? But it is not a gift. What do you think?







share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Is it ok? No. Have you raised your issues with your manager?
    – Jane S♦
    Feb 1 '16 at 3:58






  • 16




    If the task is boring and nobody wants to do it, can it be automated?
    – Patricia Shanahan
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:14






  • 8




    "Although I do not see which policy it may violate" - Offering a colleague anything (money or otherwise) in order to circumvent your manager's directions is the problematic part.
    – Brandin
    Feb 1 '16 at 9:56






  • 31




    Wow, I want to work in a company where you can actually have a conversation with your DB ^_^ Sounds a lot easier than writing SQL queries.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Feb 1 '16 at 10:47






  • 2




    When I get a boring task, I look at it as an opportunity to ask "How can I automate my way out of ever doing this again?". Once a solution is automated, the on-going cost is reduced, which is good for the business, and building the solution was fun. It's a win-win, once you put yourself in the right frame of mind.
    – Brandon
    Feb 1 '16 at 15:40
















up vote
15
down vote

favorite
1












I was given this task that hardly anyone wants to do and is so boring. It is also on a boundary of my expertise. The DB gives some general recommendations when I tell him politely that I am stuck with it. Hiring a contractor is not an option.



I am so frustrated about it that I would happily pay cash to another guy who is good at it, but assigned to more urgent stuff at the moment. At the same time I feel that it may be looked at as something inappropriate. Although I do not see which policy it may violate (gift policy? But it is not a gift. What do you think?







share|improve this question


















  • 1




    Is it ok? No. Have you raised your issues with your manager?
    – Jane S♦
    Feb 1 '16 at 3:58






  • 16




    If the task is boring and nobody wants to do it, can it be automated?
    – Patricia Shanahan
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:14






  • 8




    "Although I do not see which policy it may violate" - Offering a colleague anything (money or otherwise) in order to circumvent your manager's directions is the problematic part.
    – Brandin
    Feb 1 '16 at 9:56






  • 31




    Wow, I want to work in a company where you can actually have a conversation with your DB ^_^ Sounds a lot easier than writing SQL queries.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Feb 1 '16 at 10:47






  • 2




    When I get a boring task, I look at it as an opportunity to ask "How can I automate my way out of ever doing this again?". Once a solution is automated, the on-going cost is reduced, which is good for the business, and building the solution was fun. It's a win-win, once you put yourself in the right frame of mind.
    – Brandon
    Feb 1 '16 at 15:40












up vote
15
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
15
down vote

favorite
1






1





I was given this task that hardly anyone wants to do and is so boring. It is also on a boundary of my expertise. The DB gives some general recommendations when I tell him politely that I am stuck with it. Hiring a contractor is not an option.



I am so frustrated about it that I would happily pay cash to another guy who is good at it, but assigned to more urgent stuff at the moment. At the same time I feel that it may be looked at as something inappropriate. Although I do not see which policy it may violate (gift policy? But it is not a gift. What do you think?







share|improve this question














I was given this task that hardly anyone wants to do and is so boring. It is also on a boundary of my expertise. The DB gives some general recommendations when I tell him politely that I am stuck with it. Hiring a contractor is not an option.



I am so frustrated about it that I would happily pay cash to another guy who is good at it, but assigned to more urgent stuff at the moment. At the same time I feel that it may be looked at as something inappropriate. Although I do not see which policy it may violate (gift policy? But it is not a gift. What do you think?









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 1 '16 at 20:42









Mark Rogers

460512




460512










asked Feb 1 '16 at 3:20









Jay Random

8414




8414







  • 1




    Is it ok? No. Have you raised your issues with your manager?
    – Jane S♦
    Feb 1 '16 at 3:58






  • 16




    If the task is boring and nobody wants to do it, can it be automated?
    – Patricia Shanahan
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:14






  • 8




    "Although I do not see which policy it may violate" - Offering a colleague anything (money or otherwise) in order to circumvent your manager's directions is the problematic part.
    – Brandin
    Feb 1 '16 at 9:56






  • 31




    Wow, I want to work in a company where you can actually have a conversation with your DB ^_^ Sounds a lot easier than writing SQL queries.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Feb 1 '16 at 10:47






  • 2




    When I get a boring task, I look at it as an opportunity to ask "How can I automate my way out of ever doing this again?". Once a solution is automated, the on-going cost is reduced, which is good for the business, and building the solution was fun. It's a win-win, once you put yourself in the right frame of mind.
    – Brandon
    Feb 1 '16 at 15:40












  • 1




    Is it ok? No. Have you raised your issues with your manager?
    – Jane S♦
    Feb 1 '16 at 3:58






  • 16




    If the task is boring and nobody wants to do it, can it be automated?
    – Patricia Shanahan
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:14






  • 8




    "Although I do not see which policy it may violate" - Offering a colleague anything (money or otherwise) in order to circumvent your manager's directions is the problematic part.
    – Brandin
    Feb 1 '16 at 9:56






  • 31




    Wow, I want to work in a company where you can actually have a conversation with your DB ^_^ Sounds a lot easier than writing SQL queries.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Feb 1 '16 at 10:47






  • 2




    When I get a boring task, I look at it as an opportunity to ask "How can I automate my way out of ever doing this again?". Once a solution is automated, the on-going cost is reduced, which is good for the business, and building the solution was fun. It's a win-win, once you put yourself in the right frame of mind.
    – Brandon
    Feb 1 '16 at 15:40







1




1




Is it ok? No. Have you raised your issues with your manager?
– Jane S♦
Feb 1 '16 at 3:58




Is it ok? No. Have you raised your issues with your manager?
– Jane S♦
Feb 1 '16 at 3:58




16




16




If the task is boring and nobody wants to do it, can it be automated?
– Patricia Shanahan
Feb 1 '16 at 4:14




If the task is boring and nobody wants to do it, can it be automated?
– Patricia Shanahan
Feb 1 '16 at 4:14




8




8




"Although I do not see which policy it may violate" - Offering a colleague anything (money or otherwise) in order to circumvent your manager's directions is the problematic part.
– Brandin
Feb 1 '16 at 9:56




"Although I do not see which policy it may violate" - Offering a colleague anything (money or otherwise) in order to circumvent your manager's directions is the problematic part.
– Brandin
Feb 1 '16 at 9:56




31




31




Wow, I want to work in a company where you can actually have a conversation with your DB ^_^ Sounds a lot easier than writing SQL queries.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Feb 1 '16 at 10:47




Wow, I want to work in a company where you can actually have a conversation with your DB ^_^ Sounds a lot easier than writing SQL queries.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Feb 1 '16 at 10:47




2




2




When I get a boring task, I look at it as an opportunity to ask "How can I automate my way out of ever doing this again?". Once a solution is automated, the on-going cost is reduced, which is good for the business, and building the solution was fun. It's a win-win, once you put yourself in the right frame of mind.
– Brandon
Feb 1 '16 at 15:40




When I get a boring task, I look at it as an opportunity to ask "How can I automate my way out of ever doing this again?". Once a solution is automated, the on-going cost is reduced, which is good for the business, and building the solution was fun. It's a win-win, once you put yourself in the right frame of mind.
– Brandon
Feb 1 '16 at 15:40










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
55
down vote



accepted










I agree with Viv's answer, but I think it is worth expressing why it is inappropriate.



If you offered money, and your colleague accepted, one of two things would happen. He would do it as part of his work, or in addition.



If he did it as part of his work, you would have paid him to change his priorities from those set by management, a conflict of interest.



If he did it in addition, you would be hiring him as a contractor, without getting permission to pay a contractor and doing all the proper tax and similar paperwork.






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks, that explains it, though I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor. But the other thing- gift policy in financial organisations at least- says one cannot accept any amount of cash, even minimal.
    – Jay Random
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:31











  • @JayRandom That is one of the reasons why it would be inappropriate, even if he did the work outside normal working hours.
    – Patricia Shanahan
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:32










  • "I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor." Certainly you can. This is called moonlighting. (And as Patricia notes, it would be illegal if done without the correct paperwork etc., and even if you did do the paperwork, it would be unprofessional.)
    – Stephan Kolassa
    Feb 1 '16 at 12:14







  • 3




    It's also worth noting the "on the boundary of my expertise" line. It's a feature of good management for people to get on-the-job training with things they can't currently do. It also helps avoid "information silos" where only one person can do a job. Trying to skip out on that could cause a problem for your manager. The "boring" part is tricky, because often there are boring things which still have to happen for work to get done. And I'm not sure how something can be "boring" whilst involving learning some new stuff.
    – Graham
    Feb 1 '16 at 14:30










  • @StephanKolassa: moonlighting is an employee working for some other party under contract outside the hours of their normal job. I agree with Jay's statement that working for the same company under both consulting contract and as employee is generally not possible.
    – Ben Voigt
    Feb 1 '16 at 20:46

















up vote
14
down vote













It is definitely not OK to offer cash. If you think the other person is suitable for the task, perhaps you can arrange to swap tasks with them, through your manager or whoever assigned the task to you. If all else fails, perhaps the other person would agree to helping you out or offer some guidance with the task?






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    It would only be acceptable in a situation where your boss said: "Jay and Jim, I have two tasks here and each task needs to be done by one of you. You figure out between yourselves who does what". And then you would negotiate who does what.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 3




      And you think in that case it would be acceptable if Jay bribes Jim into taking the more uncomfortable task? I'm not that much into this, but THIS sounds for me like having even more potential to backfire.
      – Zaibis
      Feb 1 '16 at 10:42






    • 3




      @Zaibis -paying someone to work is literally the opposite of bribe.
      – Davor
      Feb 1 '16 at 12:49






    • 3




      In this case, paying cash seems no worse than two colleagues bartering like "Hey Jim, I know you're better at X and can do it in half the time as me, if you do this task for me, I'll buy beers next time we go out" (a transaction that I've witnessed more than once, and have even participated in myself). Or sometimes it's bartering tasks to work on: "Jim, if you write X for me, then I'll run the marketing reports for the next month"
      – Johnny
      Feb 1 '16 at 17:05











    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: false,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61359%2fis-it-ok-to-offer-cash-to-a-colleague-to-do-a-task-that-i-do-not-want-to-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

























    StackExchange.ready(function ()
    $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
    var showEditor = function()
    $("#show-editor-button").hide();
    $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
    StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
    ;

    var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
    if(useFancy == 'True')
    var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
    var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
    var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

    $(this).loadPopup(
    url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
    loaded: function(popup)
    var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
    var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
    var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

    pTitle.text(popupTitle);
    pBody.html(popupBody);
    pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

    )
    else
    var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
    if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
    showEditor();


    );
    );






    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    55
    down vote



    accepted










    I agree with Viv's answer, but I think it is worth expressing why it is inappropriate.



    If you offered money, and your colleague accepted, one of two things would happen. He would do it as part of his work, or in addition.



    If he did it as part of his work, you would have paid him to change his priorities from those set by management, a conflict of interest.



    If he did it in addition, you would be hiring him as a contractor, without getting permission to pay a contractor and doing all the proper tax and similar paperwork.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Thanks, that explains it, though I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor. But the other thing- gift policy in financial organisations at least- says one cannot accept any amount of cash, even minimal.
      – Jay Random
      Feb 1 '16 at 4:31











    • @JayRandom That is one of the reasons why it would be inappropriate, even if he did the work outside normal working hours.
      – Patricia Shanahan
      Feb 1 '16 at 4:32










    • "I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor." Certainly you can. This is called moonlighting. (And as Patricia notes, it would be illegal if done without the correct paperwork etc., and even if you did do the paperwork, it would be unprofessional.)
      – Stephan Kolassa
      Feb 1 '16 at 12:14







    • 3




      It's also worth noting the "on the boundary of my expertise" line. It's a feature of good management for people to get on-the-job training with things they can't currently do. It also helps avoid "information silos" where only one person can do a job. Trying to skip out on that could cause a problem for your manager. The "boring" part is tricky, because often there are boring things which still have to happen for work to get done. And I'm not sure how something can be "boring" whilst involving learning some new stuff.
      – Graham
      Feb 1 '16 at 14:30










    • @StephanKolassa: moonlighting is an employee working for some other party under contract outside the hours of their normal job. I agree with Jay's statement that working for the same company under both consulting contract and as employee is generally not possible.
      – Ben Voigt
      Feb 1 '16 at 20:46














    up vote
    55
    down vote



    accepted










    I agree with Viv's answer, but I think it is worth expressing why it is inappropriate.



    If you offered money, and your colleague accepted, one of two things would happen. He would do it as part of his work, or in addition.



    If he did it as part of his work, you would have paid him to change his priorities from those set by management, a conflict of interest.



    If he did it in addition, you would be hiring him as a contractor, without getting permission to pay a contractor and doing all the proper tax and similar paperwork.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Thanks, that explains it, though I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor. But the other thing- gift policy in financial organisations at least- says one cannot accept any amount of cash, even minimal.
      – Jay Random
      Feb 1 '16 at 4:31











    • @JayRandom That is one of the reasons why it would be inappropriate, even if he did the work outside normal working hours.
      – Patricia Shanahan
      Feb 1 '16 at 4:32










    • "I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor." Certainly you can. This is called moonlighting. (And as Patricia notes, it would be illegal if done without the correct paperwork etc., and even if you did do the paperwork, it would be unprofessional.)
      – Stephan Kolassa
      Feb 1 '16 at 12:14







    • 3




      It's also worth noting the "on the boundary of my expertise" line. It's a feature of good management for people to get on-the-job training with things they can't currently do. It also helps avoid "information silos" where only one person can do a job. Trying to skip out on that could cause a problem for your manager. The "boring" part is tricky, because often there are boring things which still have to happen for work to get done. And I'm not sure how something can be "boring" whilst involving learning some new stuff.
      – Graham
      Feb 1 '16 at 14:30










    • @StephanKolassa: moonlighting is an employee working for some other party under contract outside the hours of their normal job. I agree with Jay's statement that working for the same company under both consulting contract and as employee is generally not possible.
      – Ben Voigt
      Feb 1 '16 at 20:46












    up vote
    55
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    55
    down vote



    accepted






    I agree with Viv's answer, but I think it is worth expressing why it is inappropriate.



    If you offered money, and your colleague accepted, one of two things would happen. He would do it as part of his work, or in addition.



    If he did it as part of his work, you would have paid him to change his priorities from those set by management, a conflict of interest.



    If he did it in addition, you would be hiring him as a contractor, without getting permission to pay a contractor and doing all the proper tax and similar paperwork.






    share|improve this answer














    I agree with Viv's answer, but I think it is worth expressing why it is inappropriate.



    If you offered money, and your colleague accepted, one of two things would happen. He would do it as part of his work, or in addition.



    If he did it as part of his work, you would have paid him to change his priorities from those set by management, a conflict of interest.



    If he did it in addition, you would be hiring him as a contractor, without getting permission to pay a contractor and doing all the proper tax and similar paperwork.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Feb 1 '16 at 14:23









    Community♦

    1




    1










    answered Feb 1 '16 at 4:22









    Patricia Shanahan

    16.2k53256




    16.2k53256











    • Thanks, that explains it, though I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor. But the other thing- gift policy in financial organisations at least- says one cannot accept any amount of cash, even minimal.
      – Jay Random
      Feb 1 '16 at 4:31











    • @JayRandom That is one of the reasons why it would be inappropriate, even if he did the work outside normal working hours.
      – Patricia Shanahan
      Feb 1 '16 at 4:32










    • "I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor." Certainly you can. This is called moonlighting. (And as Patricia notes, it would be illegal if done without the correct paperwork etc., and even if you did do the paperwork, it would be unprofessional.)
      – Stephan Kolassa
      Feb 1 '16 at 12:14







    • 3




      It's also worth noting the "on the boundary of my expertise" line. It's a feature of good management for people to get on-the-job training with things they can't currently do. It also helps avoid "information silos" where only one person can do a job. Trying to skip out on that could cause a problem for your manager. The "boring" part is tricky, because often there are boring things which still have to happen for work to get done. And I'm not sure how something can be "boring" whilst involving learning some new stuff.
      – Graham
      Feb 1 '16 at 14:30










    • @StephanKolassa: moonlighting is an employee working for some other party under contract outside the hours of their normal job. I agree with Jay's statement that working for the same company under both consulting contract and as employee is generally not possible.
      – Ben Voigt
      Feb 1 '16 at 20:46
















    • Thanks, that explains it, though I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor. But the other thing- gift policy in financial organisations at least- says one cannot accept any amount of cash, even minimal.
      – Jay Random
      Feb 1 '16 at 4:31











    • @JayRandom That is one of the reasons why it would be inappropriate, even if he did the work outside normal working hours.
      – Patricia Shanahan
      Feb 1 '16 at 4:32










    • "I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor." Certainly you can. This is called moonlighting. (And as Patricia notes, it would be illegal if done without the correct paperwork etc., and even if you did do the paperwork, it would be unprofessional.)
      – Stephan Kolassa
      Feb 1 '16 at 12:14







    • 3




      It's also worth noting the "on the boundary of my expertise" line. It's a feature of good management for people to get on-the-job training with things they can't currently do. It also helps avoid "information silos" where only one person can do a job. Trying to skip out on that could cause a problem for your manager. The "boring" part is tricky, because often there are boring things which still have to happen for work to get done. And I'm not sure how something can be "boring" whilst involving learning some new stuff.
      – Graham
      Feb 1 '16 at 14:30










    • @StephanKolassa: moonlighting is an employee working for some other party under contract outside the hours of their normal job. I agree with Jay's statement that working for the same company under both consulting contract and as employee is generally not possible.
      – Ben Voigt
      Feb 1 '16 at 20:46















    Thanks, that explains it, though I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor. But the other thing- gift policy in financial organisations at least- says one cannot accept any amount of cash, even minimal.
    – Jay Random
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:31





    Thanks, that explains it, though I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor. But the other thing- gift policy in financial organisations at least- says one cannot accept any amount of cash, even minimal.
    – Jay Random
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:31













    @JayRandom That is one of the reasons why it would be inappropriate, even if he did the work outside normal working hours.
    – Patricia Shanahan
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:32




    @JayRandom That is one of the reasons why it would be inappropriate, even if he did the work outside normal working hours.
    – Patricia Shanahan
    Feb 1 '16 at 4:32












    "I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor." Certainly you can. This is called moonlighting. (And as Patricia notes, it would be illegal if done without the correct paperwork etc., and even if you did do the paperwork, it would be unprofessional.)
    – Stephan Kolassa
    Feb 1 '16 at 12:14





    "I do not think one can hire an existing employee as a contractor." Certainly you can. This is called moonlighting. (And as Patricia notes, it would be illegal if done without the correct paperwork etc., and even if you did do the paperwork, it would be unprofessional.)
    – Stephan Kolassa
    Feb 1 '16 at 12:14





    3




    3




    It's also worth noting the "on the boundary of my expertise" line. It's a feature of good management for people to get on-the-job training with things they can't currently do. It also helps avoid "information silos" where only one person can do a job. Trying to skip out on that could cause a problem for your manager. The "boring" part is tricky, because often there are boring things which still have to happen for work to get done. And I'm not sure how something can be "boring" whilst involving learning some new stuff.
    – Graham
    Feb 1 '16 at 14:30




    It's also worth noting the "on the boundary of my expertise" line. It's a feature of good management for people to get on-the-job training with things they can't currently do. It also helps avoid "information silos" where only one person can do a job. Trying to skip out on that could cause a problem for your manager. The "boring" part is tricky, because often there are boring things which still have to happen for work to get done. And I'm not sure how something can be "boring" whilst involving learning some new stuff.
    – Graham
    Feb 1 '16 at 14:30












    @StephanKolassa: moonlighting is an employee working for some other party under contract outside the hours of their normal job. I agree with Jay's statement that working for the same company under both consulting contract and as employee is generally not possible.
    – Ben Voigt
    Feb 1 '16 at 20:46




    @StephanKolassa: moonlighting is an employee working for some other party under contract outside the hours of their normal job. I agree with Jay's statement that working for the same company under both consulting contract and as employee is generally not possible.
    – Ben Voigt
    Feb 1 '16 at 20:46












    up vote
    14
    down vote













    It is definitely not OK to offer cash. If you think the other person is suitable for the task, perhaps you can arrange to swap tasks with them, through your manager or whoever assigned the task to you. If all else fails, perhaps the other person would agree to helping you out or offer some guidance with the task?






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      14
      down vote













      It is definitely not OK to offer cash. If you think the other person is suitable for the task, perhaps you can arrange to swap tasks with them, through your manager or whoever assigned the task to you. If all else fails, perhaps the other person would agree to helping you out or offer some guidance with the task?






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        14
        down vote










        up vote
        14
        down vote









        It is definitely not OK to offer cash. If you think the other person is suitable for the task, perhaps you can arrange to swap tasks with them, through your manager or whoever assigned the task to you. If all else fails, perhaps the other person would agree to helping you out or offer some guidance with the task?






        share|improve this answer














        It is definitely not OK to offer cash. If you think the other person is suitable for the task, perhaps you can arrange to swap tasks with them, through your manager or whoever assigned the task to you. If all else fails, perhaps the other person would agree to helping you out or offer some guidance with the task?







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Feb 1 '16 at 14:24









        Trang Oul

        1136




        1136










        answered Feb 1 '16 at 4:04









        Viv

        720313




        720313




















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            It would only be acceptable in a situation where your boss said: "Jay and Jim, I have two tasks here and each task needs to be done by one of you. You figure out between yourselves who does what". And then you would negotiate who does what.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 3




              And you think in that case it would be acceptable if Jay bribes Jim into taking the more uncomfortable task? I'm not that much into this, but THIS sounds for me like having even more potential to backfire.
              – Zaibis
              Feb 1 '16 at 10:42






            • 3




              @Zaibis -paying someone to work is literally the opposite of bribe.
              – Davor
              Feb 1 '16 at 12:49






            • 3




              In this case, paying cash seems no worse than two colleagues bartering like "Hey Jim, I know you're better at X and can do it in half the time as me, if you do this task for me, I'll buy beers next time we go out" (a transaction that I've witnessed more than once, and have even participated in myself). Or sometimes it's bartering tasks to work on: "Jim, if you write X for me, then I'll run the marketing reports for the next month"
              – Johnny
              Feb 1 '16 at 17:05















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            It would only be acceptable in a situation where your boss said: "Jay and Jim, I have two tasks here and each task needs to be done by one of you. You figure out between yourselves who does what". And then you would negotiate who does what.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 3




              And you think in that case it would be acceptable if Jay bribes Jim into taking the more uncomfortable task? I'm not that much into this, but THIS sounds for me like having even more potential to backfire.
              – Zaibis
              Feb 1 '16 at 10:42






            • 3




              @Zaibis -paying someone to work is literally the opposite of bribe.
              – Davor
              Feb 1 '16 at 12:49






            • 3




              In this case, paying cash seems no worse than two colleagues bartering like "Hey Jim, I know you're better at X and can do it in half the time as me, if you do this task for me, I'll buy beers next time we go out" (a transaction that I've witnessed more than once, and have even participated in myself). Or sometimes it's bartering tasks to work on: "Jim, if you write X for me, then I'll run the marketing reports for the next month"
              – Johnny
              Feb 1 '16 at 17:05













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            It would only be acceptable in a situation where your boss said: "Jay and Jim, I have two tasks here and each task needs to be done by one of you. You figure out between yourselves who does what". And then you would negotiate who does what.






            share|improve this answer












            It would only be acceptable in a situation where your boss said: "Jay and Jim, I have two tasks here and each task needs to be done by one of you. You figure out between yourselves who does what". And then you would negotiate who does what.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Feb 1 '16 at 8:56









            gnasher729

            70.9k31131222




            70.9k31131222







            • 3




              And you think in that case it would be acceptable if Jay bribes Jim into taking the more uncomfortable task? I'm not that much into this, but THIS sounds for me like having even more potential to backfire.
              – Zaibis
              Feb 1 '16 at 10:42






            • 3




              @Zaibis -paying someone to work is literally the opposite of bribe.
              – Davor
              Feb 1 '16 at 12:49






            • 3




              In this case, paying cash seems no worse than two colleagues bartering like "Hey Jim, I know you're better at X and can do it in half the time as me, if you do this task for me, I'll buy beers next time we go out" (a transaction that I've witnessed more than once, and have even participated in myself). Or sometimes it's bartering tasks to work on: "Jim, if you write X for me, then I'll run the marketing reports for the next month"
              – Johnny
              Feb 1 '16 at 17:05













            • 3




              And you think in that case it would be acceptable if Jay bribes Jim into taking the more uncomfortable task? I'm not that much into this, but THIS sounds for me like having even more potential to backfire.
              – Zaibis
              Feb 1 '16 at 10:42






            • 3




              @Zaibis -paying someone to work is literally the opposite of bribe.
              – Davor
              Feb 1 '16 at 12:49






            • 3




              In this case, paying cash seems no worse than two colleagues bartering like "Hey Jim, I know you're better at X and can do it in half the time as me, if you do this task for me, I'll buy beers next time we go out" (a transaction that I've witnessed more than once, and have even participated in myself). Or sometimes it's bartering tasks to work on: "Jim, if you write X for me, then I'll run the marketing reports for the next month"
              – Johnny
              Feb 1 '16 at 17:05








            3




            3




            And you think in that case it would be acceptable if Jay bribes Jim into taking the more uncomfortable task? I'm not that much into this, but THIS sounds for me like having even more potential to backfire.
            – Zaibis
            Feb 1 '16 at 10:42




            And you think in that case it would be acceptable if Jay bribes Jim into taking the more uncomfortable task? I'm not that much into this, but THIS sounds for me like having even more potential to backfire.
            – Zaibis
            Feb 1 '16 at 10:42




            3




            3




            @Zaibis -paying someone to work is literally the opposite of bribe.
            – Davor
            Feb 1 '16 at 12:49




            @Zaibis -paying someone to work is literally the opposite of bribe.
            – Davor
            Feb 1 '16 at 12:49




            3




            3




            In this case, paying cash seems no worse than two colleagues bartering like "Hey Jim, I know you're better at X and can do it in half the time as me, if you do this task for me, I'll buy beers next time we go out" (a transaction that I've witnessed more than once, and have even participated in myself). Or sometimes it's bartering tasks to work on: "Jim, if you write X for me, then I'll run the marketing reports for the next month"
            – Johnny
            Feb 1 '16 at 17:05





            In this case, paying cash seems no worse than two colleagues bartering like "Hey Jim, I know you're better at X and can do it in half the time as me, if you do this task for me, I'll buy beers next time we go out" (a transaction that I've witnessed more than once, and have even participated in myself). Or sometimes it's bartering tasks to work on: "Jim, if you write X for me, then I'll run the marketing reports for the next month"
            – Johnny
            Feb 1 '16 at 17:05













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61359%2fis-it-ok-to-offer-cash-to-a-colleague-to-do-a-task-that-i-do-not-want-to-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            One-line joke

            Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

            What is the Windows Projected File System?