What happens when I'm called from work on my day off? [closed]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm taking a day off. My boss expects me to check email from home. If I answer emails from home or take a call during my day off, do I have to count this as a day off since I've actually worked?
I am salaried exempt.
time-off
closed as off-topic by Jan Doggen, Joel Etherton, Philip Kendall, David K, Dawny33 Nov 30 '15 at 16:30
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." â Jan Doggen, Joel Etherton, Philip Kendall, David K, Dawny33
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm taking a day off. My boss expects me to check email from home. If I answer emails from home or take a call during my day off, do I have to count this as a day off since I've actually worked?
I am salaried exempt.
time-off
closed as off-topic by Jan Doggen, Joel Etherton, Philip Kendall, David K, Dawny33 Nov 30 '15 at 16:30
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." â Jan Doggen, Joel Etherton, Philip Kendall, David K, Dawny33
I am salary exempt
â Suzan Chamberlain
Nov 30 '15 at 16:02
1
Possible duplicate: Does an exempt employee spend time-off if they're called in during?
â David K
Nov 30 '15 at 16:28
1
Voted to reopen: this is a common question and has a perfectly valid answer given basic knowledge of the US' employment laws (exempt versus non-exempt status). Any manager or HR staffer should be aware of this concept which makes this on-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:34
It may be valid, but it's also a duplicate (although there is a better answer here than any of the ones on the original). I suggest closing this and suggesting that the answer be posted on the original question.
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:57
1
@DJClayworth a dupe is not necessary restricted for a question older than other. If a question is better, and has higher quality answer, even though it were asked before other, that post should be left open, and the lower-quality one made dupe. The answer was made here and answered this specific setup (although similar), moving it may not be so easy.
â DarkCygnus
Nov 14 '17 at 21:27
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm taking a day off. My boss expects me to check email from home. If I answer emails from home or take a call during my day off, do I have to count this as a day off since I've actually worked?
I am salaried exempt.
time-off
I'm taking a day off. My boss expects me to check email from home. If I answer emails from home or take a call during my day off, do I have to count this as a day off since I've actually worked?
I am salaried exempt.
time-off
edited Nov 30 '15 at 16:10
Elysian Fieldsâ¦
96.7k46292449
96.7k46292449
asked Nov 30 '15 at 16:01
Suzan Chamberlain
42
42
closed as off-topic by Jan Doggen, Joel Etherton, Philip Kendall, David K, Dawny33 Nov 30 '15 at 16:30
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." â Jan Doggen, Joel Etherton, Philip Kendall, David K, Dawny33
closed as off-topic by Jan Doggen, Joel Etherton, Philip Kendall, David K, Dawny33 Nov 30 '15 at 16:30
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only a specific company or position are of limited use to future visitors. Questions seeking legal advice should be directed to legal professionals. For more information, click here." â Jan Doggen, Joel Etherton, Philip Kendall, David K, Dawny33
I am salary exempt
â Suzan Chamberlain
Nov 30 '15 at 16:02
1
Possible duplicate: Does an exempt employee spend time-off if they're called in during?
â David K
Nov 30 '15 at 16:28
1
Voted to reopen: this is a common question and has a perfectly valid answer given basic knowledge of the US' employment laws (exempt versus non-exempt status). Any manager or HR staffer should be aware of this concept which makes this on-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:34
It may be valid, but it's also a duplicate (although there is a better answer here than any of the ones on the original). I suggest closing this and suggesting that the answer be posted on the original question.
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:57
1
@DJClayworth a dupe is not necessary restricted for a question older than other. If a question is better, and has higher quality answer, even though it were asked before other, that post should be left open, and the lower-quality one made dupe. The answer was made here and answered this specific setup (although similar), moving it may not be so easy.
â DarkCygnus
Nov 14 '17 at 21:27
suggest improvements |Â
I am salary exempt
â Suzan Chamberlain
Nov 30 '15 at 16:02
1
Possible duplicate: Does an exempt employee spend time-off if they're called in during?
â David K
Nov 30 '15 at 16:28
1
Voted to reopen: this is a common question and has a perfectly valid answer given basic knowledge of the US' employment laws (exempt versus non-exempt status). Any manager or HR staffer should be aware of this concept which makes this on-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:34
It may be valid, but it's also a duplicate (although there is a better answer here than any of the ones on the original). I suggest closing this and suggesting that the answer be posted on the original question.
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:57
1
@DJClayworth a dupe is not necessary restricted for a question older than other. If a question is better, and has higher quality answer, even though it were asked before other, that post should be left open, and the lower-quality one made dupe. The answer was made here and answered this specific setup (although similar), moving it may not be so easy.
â DarkCygnus
Nov 14 '17 at 21:27
I am salary exempt
â Suzan Chamberlain
Nov 30 '15 at 16:02
I am salary exempt
â Suzan Chamberlain
Nov 30 '15 at 16:02
1
1
Possible duplicate: Does an exempt employee spend time-off if they're called in during?
â David K
Nov 30 '15 at 16:28
Possible duplicate: Does an exempt employee spend time-off if they're called in during?
â David K
Nov 30 '15 at 16:28
1
1
Voted to reopen: this is a common question and has a perfectly valid answer given basic knowledge of the US' employment laws (exempt versus non-exempt status). Any manager or HR staffer should be aware of this concept which makes this on-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:34
Voted to reopen: this is a common question and has a perfectly valid answer given basic knowledge of the US' employment laws (exempt versus non-exempt status). Any manager or HR staffer should be aware of this concept which makes this on-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:34
It may be valid, but it's also a duplicate (although there is a better answer here than any of the ones on the original). I suggest closing this and suggesting that the answer be posted on the original question.
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:57
It may be valid, but it's also a duplicate (although there is a better answer here than any of the ones on the original). I suggest closing this and suggesting that the answer be posted on the original question.
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:57
1
1
@DJClayworth a dupe is not necessary restricted for a question older than other. If a question is better, and has higher quality answer, even though it were asked before other, that post should be left open, and the lower-quality one made dupe. The answer was made here and answered this specific setup (although similar), moving it may not be so easy.
â DarkCygnus
Nov 14 '17 at 21:27
@DJClayworth a dupe is not necessary restricted for a question older than other. If a question is better, and has higher quality answer, even though it were asked before other, that post should be left open, and the lower-quality one made dupe. The answer was made here and answered this specific setup (although similar), moving it may not be so easy.
â DarkCygnus
Nov 14 '17 at 21:27
suggest improvements |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
If you're expected to check e-mails, then it's not a day off and you need to be paid.
As this article from the Law Office of Kristine A. Sova explains (emphasis added):
...the reality is that
technological tools, both company-issued and personal, have increased
employee accessibility, especially when off site or after hours. This
increased accessibility in turn increases the possibility that
employees are performing off-the-clock work that should be paid. And,
work that arguably should be paid, but isnâÂÂt, creates an avenue for
employees to assert unpaid wage claims against their employers.
How can this be? Through five magic words: âÂÂsuffer or permit to
work.âÂÂ
âÂÂSuffer or permit to workâ means that if an employer requires or
allows employees to work, the time spent is generally hours worked,
and must be paid. The result is that time spent doing work not
requested by the employer, but still allowed, is generally hours
worked, if the employer knows or has reason to believe that the
employees are continuing to work and the employer is benefiting from
the work being done.
+1. I was going to answer but the question is currently on hold and you've mentioned the basics. Check my answer here for more details on exempt versus non-exempt status. Note that the question of if and how this time worked impacts OP's PTO is off-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:35
This is actually a duplicate question. Can i suggest posting this answer on the original question?
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:59
suggest improvements |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
If you're expected to check e-mails, then it's not a day off and you need to be paid.
As this article from the Law Office of Kristine A. Sova explains (emphasis added):
...the reality is that
technological tools, both company-issued and personal, have increased
employee accessibility, especially when off site or after hours. This
increased accessibility in turn increases the possibility that
employees are performing off-the-clock work that should be paid. And,
work that arguably should be paid, but isnâÂÂt, creates an avenue for
employees to assert unpaid wage claims against their employers.
How can this be? Through five magic words: âÂÂsuffer or permit to
work.âÂÂ
âÂÂSuffer or permit to workâ means that if an employer requires or
allows employees to work, the time spent is generally hours worked,
and must be paid. The result is that time spent doing work not
requested by the employer, but still allowed, is generally hours
worked, if the employer knows or has reason to believe that the
employees are continuing to work and the employer is benefiting from
the work being done.
+1. I was going to answer but the question is currently on hold and you've mentioned the basics. Check my answer here for more details on exempt versus non-exempt status. Note that the question of if and how this time worked impacts OP's PTO is off-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:35
This is actually a duplicate question. Can i suggest posting this answer on the original question?
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:59
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
3
down vote
If you're expected to check e-mails, then it's not a day off and you need to be paid.
As this article from the Law Office of Kristine A. Sova explains (emphasis added):
...the reality is that
technological tools, both company-issued and personal, have increased
employee accessibility, especially when off site or after hours. This
increased accessibility in turn increases the possibility that
employees are performing off-the-clock work that should be paid. And,
work that arguably should be paid, but isnâÂÂt, creates an avenue for
employees to assert unpaid wage claims against their employers.
How can this be? Through five magic words: âÂÂsuffer or permit to
work.âÂÂ
âÂÂSuffer or permit to workâ means that if an employer requires or
allows employees to work, the time spent is generally hours worked,
and must be paid. The result is that time spent doing work not
requested by the employer, but still allowed, is generally hours
worked, if the employer knows or has reason to believe that the
employees are continuing to work and the employer is benefiting from
the work being done.
+1. I was going to answer but the question is currently on hold and you've mentioned the basics. Check my answer here for more details on exempt versus non-exempt status. Note that the question of if and how this time worked impacts OP's PTO is off-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:35
This is actually a duplicate question. Can i suggest posting this answer on the original question?
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:59
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
If you're expected to check e-mails, then it's not a day off and you need to be paid.
As this article from the Law Office of Kristine A. Sova explains (emphasis added):
...the reality is that
technological tools, both company-issued and personal, have increased
employee accessibility, especially when off site or after hours. This
increased accessibility in turn increases the possibility that
employees are performing off-the-clock work that should be paid. And,
work that arguably should be paid, but isnâÂÂt, creates an avenue for
employees to assert unpaid wage claims against their employers.
How can this be? Through five magic words: âÂÂsuffer or permit to
work.âÂÂ
âÂÂSuffer or permit to workâ means that if an employer requires or
allows employees to work, the time spent is generally hours worked,
and must be paid. The result is that time spent doing work not
requested by the employer, but still allowed, is generally hours
worked, if the employer knows or has reason to believe that the
employees are continuing to work and the employer is benefiting from
the work being done.
If you're expected to check e-mails, then it's not a day off and you need to be paid.
As this article from the Law Office of Kristine A. Sova explains (emphasis added):
...the reality is that
technological tools, both company-issued and personal, have increased
employee accessibility, especially when off site or after hours. This
increased accessibility in turn increases the possibility that
employees are performing off-the-clock work that should be paid. And,
work that arguably should be paid, but isnâÂÂt, creates an avenue for
employees to assert unpaid wage claims against their employers.
How can this be? Through five magic words: âÂÂsuffer or permit to
work.âÂÂ
âÂÂSuffer or permit to workâ means that if an employer requires or
allows employees to work, the time spent is generally hours worked,
and must be paid. The result is that time spent doing work not
requested by the employer, but still allowed, is generally hours
worked, if the employer knows or has reason to believe that the
employees are continuing to work and the employer is benefiting from
the work being done.
edited Nov 30 '15 at 16:31
Lilienthalâ¦
53.9k36183218
53.9k36183218
answered Nov 30 '15 at 16:07
Xavier J
26.3k104797
26.3k104797
+1. I was going to answer but the question is currently on hold and you've mentioned the basics. Check my answer here for more details on exempt versus non-exempt status. Note that the question of if and how this time worked impacts OP's PTO is off-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:35
This is actually a duplicate question. Can i suggest posting this answer on the original question?
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:59
suggest improvements |Â
+1. I was going to answer but the question is currently on hold and you've mentioned the basics. Check my answer here for more details on exempt versus non-exempt status. Note that the question of if and how this time worked impacts OP's PTO is off-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:35
This is actually a duplicate question. Can i suggest posting this answer on the original question?
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:59
+1. I was going to answer but the question is currently on hold and you've mentioned the basics. Check my answer here for more details on exempt versus non-exempt status. Note that the question of if and how this time worked impacts OP's PTO is off-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:35
+1. I was going to answer but the question is currently on hold and you've mentioned the basics. Check my answer here for more details on exempt versus non-exempt status. Note that the question of if and how this time worked impacts OP's PTO is off-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:35
This is actually a duplicate question. Can i suggest posting this answer on the original question?
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:59
This is actually a duplicate question. Can i suggest posting this answer on the original question?
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:59
suggest improvements |Â
I am salary exempt
â Suzan Chamberlain
Nov 30 '15 at 16:02
1
Possible duplicate: Does an exempt employee spend time-off if they're called in during?
â David K
Nov 30 '15 at 16:28
1
Voted to reopen: this is a common question and has a perfectly valid answer given basic knowledge of the US' employment laws (exempt versus non-exempt status). Any manager or HR staffer should be aware of this concept which makes this on-topic.
â Lilienthalâ¦
Nov 30 '15 at 16:34
It may be valid, but it's also a duplicate (although there is a better answer here than any of the ones on the original). I suggest closing this and suggesting that the answer be posted on the original question.
â DJClayworth
Nov 30 '15 at 16:57
1
@DJClayworth a dupe is not necessary restricted for a question older than other. If a question is better, and has higher quality answer, even though it were asked before other, that post should be left open, and the lower-quality one made dupe. The answer was made here and answered this specific setup (although similar), moving it may not be so easy.
â DarkCygnus
Nov 14 '17 at 21:27