If management doesn't care about harassement does it mean they don't care if you quit? [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
-7
down vote

favorite












If you have been subjected to long term harassment and they refuse to categorize the behavior as bullying or harassment despite the fact that by object measures it was, does that mean they don't care if you quit?



They thought that I just didn't want to work there because I did not enjoy being hassled. Is that a sign they want you gone?



They refused to own up to their behavior and just said we are 'different people'.







share|improve this question












closed as primarily opinion-based by HLGEM, paparazzo, Justin Cave, keshlam, Monica Cellio♦ Mar 4 '16 at 4:12


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 6




    You really need to let this go and move on with your life. You have left the job, stop obsessing about it. It is Highly unlikely that you will win the suit you mentioned in another question as you have no competent legal advice. The company you sue will have a lawyer.
    – HLGEM
    Mar 3 '16 at 23:32






  • 5




    Whether they wanted you gone or not is meaningless at this into, since you are gone, right? The best revenge is living well, and you won't do that while focused on this question. (And what good would either answer do you?)
    – keshlam
    Mar 3 '16 at 23:43






  • 4




    It's the not knowing the truth. And you never will. Just move on.
    – Jane S♦
    Mar 4 '16 at 2:07






  • 6




    Your question is based on a claim that by "object measures" it was harassment, but if that were really the case you would have been able to resolve it. Obviously you and they disagree on definitions; I mean, you said in another question that somebody not liking kids is hostile, which is clearly not the case. I am trying to figure out how this question could be objectively answered; it feels too opinion-based to me to work on Stack Exchange. You're asking us to speculate or read minds without access to objective information; is there some reason we shouldn't close this question?
    – Monica Cellio♦
    Mar 4 '16 at 2:31






  • 6




    Your last 7 questions are are on hold, closed, or duplicate. I don't know if that is a record but it has to be close. You are obsessing. Let it go. Move on. SE is not a therapy session. Yes voting to close.
    – paparazzo
    Mar 4 '16 at 3:04
















up vote
-7
down vote

favorite












If you have been subjected to long term harassment and they refuse to categorize the behavior as bullying or harassment despite the fact that by object measures it was, does that mean they don't care if you quit?



They thought that I just didn't want to work there because I did not enjoy being hassled. Is that a sign they want you gone?



They refused to own up to their behavior and just said we are 'different people'.







share|improve this question












closed as primarily opinion-based by HLGEM, paparazzo, Justin Cave, keshlam, Monica Cellio♦ Mar 4 '16 at 4:12


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 6




    You really need to let this go and move on with your life. You have left the job, stop obsessing about it. It is Highly unlikely that you will win the suit you mentioned in another question as you have no competent legal advice. The company you sue will have a lawyer.
    – HLGEM
    Mar 3 '16 at 23:32






  • 5




    Whether they wanted you gone or not is meaningless at this into, since you are gone, right? The best revenge is living well, and you won't do that while focused on this question. (And what good would either answer do you?)
    – keshlam
    Mar 3 '16 at 23:43






  • 4




    It's the not knowing the truth. And you never will. Just move on.
    – Jane S♦
    Mar 4 '16 at 2:07






  • 6




    Your question is based on a claim that by "object measures" it was harassment, but if that were really the case you would have been able to resolve it. Obviously you and they disagree on definitions; I mean, you said in another question that somebody not liking kids is hostile, which is clearly not the case. I am trying to figure out how this question could be objectively answered; it feels too opinion-based to me to work on Stack Exchange. You're asking us to speculate or read minds without access to objective information; is there some reason we shouldn't close this question?
    – Monica Cellio♦
    Mar 4 '16 at 2:31






  • 6




    Your last 7 questions are are on hold, closed, or duplicate. I don't know if that is a record but it has to be close. You are obsessing. Let it go. Move on. SE is not a therapy session. Yes voting to close.
    – paparazzo
    Mar 4 '16 at 3:04












up vote
-7
down vote

favorite









up vote
-7
down vote

favorite











If you have been subjected to long term harassment and they refuse to categorize the behavior as bullying or harassment despite the fact that by object measures it was, does that mean they don't care if you quit?



They thought that I just didn't want to work there because I did not enjoy being hassled. Is that a sign they want you gone?



They refused to own up to their behavior and just said we are 'different people'.







share|improve this question












If you have been subjected to long term harassment and they refuse to categorize the behavior as bullying or harassment despite the fact that by object measures it was, does that mean they don't care if you quit?



They thought that I just didn't want to work there because I did not enjoy being hassled. Is that a sign they want you gone?



They refused to own up to their behavior and just said we are 'different people'.









share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 3 '16 at 23:23









user1261710

2,04941121




2,04941121




closed as primarily opinion-based by HLGEM, paparazzo, Justin Cave, keshlam, Monica Cellio♦ Mar 4 '16 at 4:12


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






closed as primarily opinion-based by HLGEM, paparazzo, Justin Cave, keshlam, Monica Cellio♦ Mar 4 '16 at 4:12


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 6




    You really need to let this go and move on with your life. You have left the job, stop obsessing about it. It is Highly unlikely that you will win the suit you mentioned in another question as you have no competent legal advice. The company you sue will have a lawyer.
    – HLGEM
    Mar 3 '16 at 23:32






  • 5




    Whether they wanted you gone or not is meaningless at this into, since you are gone, right? The best revenge is living well, and you won't do that while focused on this question. (And what good would either answer do you?)
    – keshlam
    Mar 3 '16 at 23:43






  • 4




    It's the not knowing the truth. And you never will. Just move on.
    – Jane S♦
    Mar 4 '16 at 2:07






  • 6




    Your question is based on a claim that by "object measures" it was harassment, but if that were really the case you would have been able to resolve it. Obviously you and they disagree on definitions; I mean, you said in another question that somebody not liking kids is hostile, which is clearly not the case. I am trying to figure out how this question could be objectively answered; it feels too opinion-based to me to work on Stack Exchange. You're asking us to speculate or read minds without access to objective information; is there some reason we shouldn't close this question?
    – Monica Cellio♦
    Mar 4 '16 at 2:31






  • 6




    Your last 7 questions are are on hold, closed, or duplicate. I don't know if that is a record but it has to be close. You are obsessing. Let it go. Move on. SE is not a therapy session. Yes voting to close.
    – paparazzo
    Mar 4 '16 at 3:04












  • 6




    You really need to let this go and move on with your life. You have left the job, stop obsessing about it. It is Highly unlikely that you will win the suit you mentioned in another question as you have no competent legal advice. The company you sue will have a lawyer.
    – HLGEM
    Mar 3 '16 at 23:32






  • 5




    Whether they wanted you gone or not is meaningless at this into, since you are gone, right? The best revenge is living well, and you won't do that while focused on this question. (And what good would either answer do you?)
    – keshlam
    Mar 3 '16 at 23:43






  • 4




    It's the not knowing the truth. And you never will. Just move on.
    – Jane S♦
    Mar 4 '16 at 2:07






  • 6




    Your question is based on a claim that by "object measures" it was harassment, but if that were really the case you would have been able to resolve it. Obviously you and they disagree on definitions; I mean, you said in another question that somebody not liking kids is hostile, which is clearly not the case. I am trying to figure out how this question could be objectively answered; it feels too opinion-based to me to work on Stack Exchange. You're asking us to speculate or read minds without access to objective information; is there some reason we shouldn't close this question?
    – Monica Cellio♦
    Mar 4 '16 at 2:31






  • 6




    Your last 7 questions are are on hold, closed, or duplicate. I don't know if that is a record but it has to be close. You are obsessing. Let it go. Move on. SE is not a therapy session. Yes voting to close.
    – paparazzo
    Mar 4 '16 at 3:04







6




6




You really need to let this go and move on with your life. You have left the job, stop obsessing about it. It is Highly unlikely that you will win the suit you mentioned in another question as you have no competent legal advice. The company you sue will have a lawyer.
– HLGEM
Mar 3 '16 at 23:32




You really need to let this go and move on with your life. You have left the job, stop obsessing about it. It is Highly unlikely that you will win the suit you mentioned in another question as you have no competent legal advice. The company you sue will have a lawyer.
– HLGEM
Mar 3 '16 at 23:32




5




5




Whether they wanted you gone or not is meaningless at this into, since you are gone, right? The best revenge is living well, and you won't do that while focused on this question. (And what good would either answer do you?)
– keshlam
Mar 3 '16 at 23:43




Whether they wanted you gone or not is meaningless at this into, since you are gone, right? The best revenge is living well, and you won't do that while focused on this question. (And what good would either answer do you?)
– keshlam
Mar 3 '16 at 23:43




4




4




It's the not knowing the truth. And you never will. Just move on.
– Jane S♦
Mar 4 '16 at 2:07




It's the not knowing the truth. And you never will. Just move on.
– Jane S♦
Mar 4 '16 at 2:07




6




6




Your question is based on a claim that by "object measures" it was harassment, but if that were really the case you would have been able to resolve it. Obviously you and they disagree on definitions; I mean, you said in another question that somebody not liking kids is hostile, which is clearly not the case. I am trying to figure out how this question could be objectively answered; it feels too opinion-based to me to work on Stack Exchange. You're asking us to speculate or read minds without access to objective information; is there some reason we shouldn't close this question?
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 4 '16 at 2:31




Your question is based on a claim that by "object measures" it was harassment, but if that were really the case you would have been able to resolve it. Obviously you and they disagree on definitions; I mean, you said in another question that somebody not liking kids is hostile, which is clearly not the case. I am trying to figure out how this question could be objectively answered; it feels too opinion-based to me to work on Stack Exchange. You're asking us to speculate or read minds without access to objective information; is there some reason we shouldn't close this question?
– Monica Cellio♦
Mar 4 '16 at 2:31




6




6




Your last 7 questions are are on hold, closed, or duplicate. I don't know if that is a record but it has to be close. You are obsessing. Let it go. Move on. SE is not a therapy session. Yes voting to close.
– paparazzo
Mar 4 '16 at 3:04




Your last 7 questions are are on hold, closed, or duplicate. I don't know if that is a record but it has to be close. You are obsessing. Let it go. Move on. SE is not a therapy session. Yes voting to close.
– paparazzo
Mar 4 '16 at 3:04










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote



accepted











does that mean they don't care if you quit?




Pretty much, they did a little equation in their head and decided losing you is less trouble than solving your issue. Their exact reasoning is only known to them, but that's the gist of it.






share|improve this answer



























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    6
    down vote



    accepted











    does that mean they don't care if you quit?




    Pretty much, they did a little equation in their head and decided losing you is less trouble than solving your issue. Their exact reasoning is only known to them, but that's the gist of it.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      6
      down vote



      accepted











      does that mean they don't care if you quit?




      Pretty much, they did a little equation in their head and decided losing you is less trouble than solving your issue. Their exact reasoning is only known to them, but that's the gist of it.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        6
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        6
        down vote



        accepted







        does that mean they don't care if you quit?




        Pretty much, they did a little equation in their head and decided losing you is less trouble than solving your issue. Their exact reasoning is only known to them, but that's the gist of it.






        share|improve this answer













        does that mean they don't care if you quit?




        Pretty much, they did a little equation in their head and decided losing you is less trouble than solving your issue. Their exact reasoning is only known to them, but that's the gist of it.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 4 '16 at 2:28









        Kilisi

        94.6k50216376




        94.6k50216376












            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            Confectionery