Conflicting information regarding acceptable practice. How to determine if doing something with permission will hurt me?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I worked from home in the month of December for two weeks with my manager's permission. My manager also allowed me to work from home for the next two weeks. A month after this happened a colleague told me that my teammates were talking about my absence and worried if I have some personal problem or if I don't like the job. My colleague also mentioned that, 'Too many days working from home might rise up as a question or concern during the annual review'.



My manager gave me permission to work from home, but I don't want it to reflect poorly on me.



How do I best determine if company policy and generally acceptable practice do not align?







share|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    I worked from home in the month of December for two weeks with my manager's permission. My manager also allowed me to work from home for the next two weeks. A month after this happened a colleague told me that my teammates were talking about my absence and worried if I have some personal problem or if I don't like the job. My colleague also mentioned that, 'Too many days working from home might rise up as a question or concern during the annual review'.



    My manager gave me permission to work from home, but I don't want it to reflect poorly on me.



    How do I best determine if company policy and generally acceptable practice do not align?







    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      I worked from home in the month of December for two weeks with my manager's permission. My manager also allowed me to work from home for the next two weeks. A month after this happened a colleague told me that my teammates were talking about my absence and worried if I have some personal problem or if I don't like the job. My colleague also mentioned that, 'Too many days working from home might rise up as a question or concern during the annual review'.



      My manager gave me permission to work from home, but I don't want it to reflect poorly on me.



      How do I best determine if company policy and generally acceptable practice do not align?







      share|improve this question














      I worked from home in the month of December for two weeks with my manager's permission. My manager also allowed me to work from home for the next two weeks. A month after this happened a colleague told me that my teammates were talking about my absence and worried if I have some personal problem or if I don't like the job. My colleague also mentioned that, 'Too many days working from home might rise up as a question or concern during the annual review'.



      My manager gave me permission to work from home, but I don't want it to reflect poorly on me.



      How do I best determine if company policy and generally acceptable practice do not align?









      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Feb 2 '16 at 22:28









      Myles

      25.4k658104




      25.4k658104










      asked Feb 2 '16 at 19:42









      Akansha

      37638




      37638




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          13
          down vote













          It's impossible to answer that. In some organizations and in some situations, colleagues are cluing you in to unwritten cultural norms. In some situations, some colleagues are privy to the thinking of some managers and give good advice. In other organizations and situations and with other colleagues, they're just gossiping or speaking about their own personal hopes and fears.



          If these are colleagues that have been in the organization for a long time and that have generally given good advice in the past, it may be worth heeding their advice. If you tend to be someone that doesn't pick up on social cues while they are generally more socially aware, it may be worth heeding their advice. If they're new to the organization, don't have any particular relationship with leadership, and aren't as socially aware as you are, it's probably safe to ignore.



          If you're really concerned, ask your manager. Your manager is, presumably, much more aware of what the company considers come review time.






          share|improve this answer






















          • Thanks much Justin. This person joined the organization 5 months before my joining and that person always passes negative comments through her thoughts.
            – Akansha
            Feb 2 '16 at 21:07

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Rumors about performance, good and bad, usually reach management at some point. Sometimes the rumors are ignored, but I've seen surprisingly often that the rumors are given more weight than they deserve.



          Your situation is tolerable for now, because at least your boss knows the rumors are false. But there are 2 considerable problems:



          • It gives your boss a lot of power over you, as they are the only ones who can put in a good word for you.

          • If your boss quits (voluntarily or otherwise) you're screwed.

          It's somewhat sad, but if you like job safety and/or money, controlling any rumors about your person is one of the top priorities in every profession.






          share|improve this answer



























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            This really depends. I find that most people fall into one of three buckets.



            1. they have set tasks down to the minute. An example would be someone working from a call center. And some call centers allow you to work out of your house.


            2. they have readily visible tasks or perform crucial group tasks. This could be a ton of people (most) and would include a developer. We can see that they are writing code, they have to have x code done by x, and they communicate what they are doing.


            3. person that helps out a group with random tasks or tasks that are of a lesser profile.


            All three of these job types are useful to an organization. Often manager's are in category #3. If you are in category #3 and people are talking about you I would be worried. You got your month at home but I would expect if you keep working from home and can't tangibly show what you are doing other than emails and instant messages, I would think your standing will decline at your company.



            Note: Part of the gossip is your manager's fault. The manager should let people know the tasks you are doing and that you are completely available to continue your job even though you are at home. From the sounds of it, your manager hasn't communicated with people until after the fact which allows the gossip train to speed up.






            share|improve this answer




















              Your Answer







              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "423"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: false,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );








               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61491%2fconflicting-information-regarding-acceptable-practice-how-to-determine-if-doing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest

























              StackExchange.ready(function ()
              $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
              var showEditor = function()
              $("#show-editor-button").hide();
              $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
              StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
              ;

              var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
              if(useFancy == 'True')
              var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
              var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
              var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

              $(this).loadPopup(
              url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
              loaded: function(popup)
              var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
              var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
              var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

              pTitle.text(popupTitle);
              pBody.html(popupBody);
              pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

              )
              else
              var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
              if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
              showEditor();


              );
              );






              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              13
              down vote













              It's impossible to answer that. In some organizations and in some situations, colleagues are cluing you in to unwritten cultural norms. In some situations, some colleagues are privy to the thinking of some managers and give good advice. In other organizations and situations and with other colleagues, they're just gossiping or speaking about their own personal hopes and fears.



              If these are colleagues that have been in the organization for a long time and that have generally given good advice in the past, it may be worth heeding their advice. If you tend to be someone that doesn't pick up on social cues while they are generally more socially aware, it may be worth heeding their advice. If they're new to the organization, don't have any particular relationship with leadership, and aren't as socially aware as you are, it's probably safe to ignore.



              If you're really concerned, ask your manager. Your manager is, presumably, much more aware of what the company considers come review time.






              share|improve this answer






















              • Thanks much Justin. This person joined the organization 5 months before my joining and that person always passes negative comments through her thoughts.
                – Akansha
                Feb 2 '16 at 21:07














              up vote
              13
              down vote













              It's impossible to answer that. In some organizations and in some situations, colleagues are cluing you in to unwritten cultural norms. In some situations, some colleagues are privy to the thinking of some managers and give good advice. In other organizations and situations and with other colleagues, they're just gossiping or speaking about their own personal hopes and fears.



              If these are colleagues that have been in the organization for a long time and that have generally given good advice in the past, it may be worth heeding their advice. If you tend to be someone that doesn't pick up on social cues while they are generally more socially aware, it may be worth heeding their advice. If they're new to the organization, don't have any particular relationship with leadership, and aren't as socially aware as you are, it's probably safe to ignore.



              If you're really concerned, ask your manager. Your manager is, presumably, much more aware of what the company considers come review time.






              share|improve this answer






















              • Thanks much Justin. This person joined the organization 5 months before my joining and that person always passes negative comments through her thoughts.
                – Akansha
                Feb 2 '16 at 21:07












              up vote
              13
              down vote










              up vote
              13
              down vote









              It's impossible to answer that. In some organizations and in some situations, colleagues are cluing you in to unwritten cultural norms. In some situations, some colleagues are privy to the thinking of some managers and give good advice. In other organizations and situations and with other colleagues, they're just gossiping or speaking about their own personal hopes and fears.



              If these are colleagues that have been in the organization for a long time and that have generally given good advice in the past, it may be worth heeding their advice. If you tend to be someone that doesn't pick up on social cues while they are generally more socially aware, it may be worth heeding their advice. If they're new to the organization, don't have any particular relationship with leadership, and aren't as socially aware as you are, it's probably safe to ignore.



              If you're really concerned, ask your manager. Your manager is, presumably, much more aware of what the company considers come review time.






              share|improve this answer














              It's impossible to answer that. In some organizations and in some situations, colleagues are cluing you in to unwritten cultural norms. In some situations, some colleagues are privy to the thinking of some managers and give good advice. In other organizations and situations and with other colleagues, they're just gossiping or speaking about their own personal hopes and fears.



              If these are colleagues that have been in the organization for a long time and that have generally given good advice in the past, it may be worth heeding their advice. If you tend to be someone that doesn't pick up on social cues while they are generally more socially aware, it may be worth heeding their advice. If they're new to the organization, don't have any particular relationship with leadership, and aren't as socially aware as you are, it's probably safe to ignore.



              If you're really concerned, ask your manager. Your manager is, presumably, much more aware of what the company considers come review time.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Feb 2 '16 at 20:26









              HLGEM

              133k25226489




              133k25226489










              answered Feb 2 '16 at 19:55









              Justin Cave

              34.8k9112136




              34.8k9112136











              • Thanks much Justin. This person joined the organization 5 months before my joining and that person always passes negative comments through her thoughts.
                – Akansha
                Feb 2 '16 at 21:07
















              • Thanks much Justin. This person joined the organization 5 months before my joining and that person always passes negative comments through her thoughts.
                – Akansha
                Feb 2 '16 at 21:07















              Thanks much Justin. This person joined the organization 5 months before my joining and that person always passes negative comments through her thoughts.
              – Akansha
              Feb 2 '16 at 21:07




              Thanks much Justin. This person joined the organization 5 months before my joining and that person always passes negative comments through her thoughts.
              – Akansha
              Feb 2 '16 at 21:07












              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Rumors about performance, good and bad, usually reach management at some point. Sometimes the rumors are ignored, but I've seen surprisingly often that the rumors are given more weight than they deserve.



              Your situation is tolerable for now, because at least your boss knows the rumors are false. But there are 2 considerable problems:



              • It gives your boss a lot of power over you, as they are the only ones who can put in a good word for you.

              • If your boss quits (voluntarily or otherwise) you're screwed.

              It's somewhat sad, but if you like job safety and/or money, controlling any rumors about your person is one of the top priorities in every profession.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Rumors about performance, good and bad, usually reach management at some point. Sometimes the rumors are ignored, but I've seen surprisingly often that the rumors are given more weight than they deserve.



                Your situation is tolerable for now, because at least your boss knows the rumors are false. But there are 2 considerable problems:



                • It gives your boss a lot of power over you, as they are the only ones who can put in a good word for you.

                • If your boss quits (voluntarily or otherwise) you're screwed.

                It's somewhat sad, but if you like job safety and/or money, controlling any rumors about your person is one of the top priorities in every profession.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Rumors about performance, good and bad, usually reach management at some point. Sometimes the rumors are ignored, but I've seen surprisingly often that the rumors are given more weight than they deserve.



                  Your situation is tolerable for now, because at least your boss knows the rumors are false. But there are 2 considerable problems:



                  • It gives your boss a lot of power over you, as they are the only ones who can put in a good word for you.

                  • If your boss quits (voluntarily or otherwise) you're screwed.

                  It's somewhat sad, but if you like job safety and/or money, controlling any rumors about your person is one of the top priorities in every profession.






                  share|improve this answer












                  Rumors about performance, good and bad, usually reach management at some point. Sometimes the rumors are ignored, but I've seen surprisingly often that the rumors are given more weight than they deserve.



                  Your situation is tolerable for now, because at least your boss knows the rumors are false. But there are 2 considerable problems:



                  • It gives your boss a lot of power over you, as they are the only ones who can put in a good word for you.

                  • If your boss quits (voluntarily or otherwise) you're screwed.

                  It's somewhat sad, but if you like job safety and/or money, controlling any rumors about your person is one of the top priorities in every profession.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Feb 2 '16 at 20:18









                  Peter

                  10.3k11835




                  10.3k11835




















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      This really depends. I find that most people fall into one of three buckets.



                      1. they have set tasks down to the minute. An example would be someone working from a call center. And some call centers allow you to work out of your house.


                      2. they have readily visible tasks or perform crucial group tasks. This could be a ton of people (most) and would include a developer. We can see that they are writing code, they have to have x code done by x, and they communicate what they are doing.


                      3. person that helps out a group with random tasks or tasks that are of a lesser profile.


                      All three of these job types are useful to an organization. Often manager's are in category #3. If you are in category #3 and people are talking about you I would be worried. You got your month at home but I would expect if you keep working from home and can't tangibly show what you are doing other than emails and instant messages, I would think your standing will decline at your company.



                      Note: Part of the gossip is your manager's fault. The manager should let people know the tasks you are doing and that you are completely available to continue your job even though you are at home. From the sounds of it, your manager hasn't communicated with people until after the fact which allows the gossip train to speed up.






                      share|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        This really depends. I find that most people fall into one of three buckets.



                        1. they have set tasks down to the minute. An example would be someone working from a call center. And some call centers allow you to work out of your house.


                        2. they have readily visible tasks or perform crucial group tasks. This could be a ton of people (most) and would include a developer. We can see that they are writing code, they have to have x code done by x, and they communicate what they are doing.


                        3. person that helps out a group with random tasks or tasks that are of a lesser profile.


                        All three of these job types are useful to an organization. Often manager's are in category #3. If you are in category #3 and people are talking about you I would be worried. You got your month at home but I would expect if you keep working from home and can't tangibly show what you are doing other than emails and instant messages, I would think your standing will decline at your company.



                        Note: Part of the gossip is your manager's fault. The manager should let people know the tasks you are doing and that you are completely available to continue your job even though you are at home. From the sounds of it, your manager hasn't communicated with people until after the fact which allows the gossip train to speed up.






                        share|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          This really depends. I find that most people fall into one of three buckets.



                          1. they have set tasks down to the minute. An example would be someone working from a call center. And some call centers allow you to work out of your house.


                          2. they have readily visible tasks or perform crucial group tasks. This could be a ton of people (most) and would include a developer. We can see that they are writing code, they have to have x code done by x, and they communicate what they are doing.


                          3. person that helps out a group with random tasks or tasks that are of a lesser profile.


                          All three of these job types are useful to an organization. Often manager's are in category #3. If you are in category #3 and people are talking about you I would be worried. You got your month at home but I would expect if you keep working from home and can't tangibly show what you are doing other than emails and instant messages, I would think your standing will decline at your company.



                          Note: Part of the gossip is your manager's fault. The manager should let people know the tasks you are doing and that you are completely available to continue your job even though you are at home. From the sounds of it, your manager hasn't communicated with people until after the fact which allows the gossip train to speed up.






                          share|improve this answer












                          This really depends. I find that most people fall into one of three buckets.



                          1. they have set tasks down to the minute. An example would be someone working from a call center. And some call centers allow you to work out of your house.


                          2. they have readily visible tasks or perform crucial group tasks. This could be a ton of people (most) and would include a developer. We can see that they are writing code, they have to have x code done by x, and they communicate what they are doing.


                          3. person that helps out a group with random tasks or tasks that are of a lesser profile.


                          All three of these job types are useful to an organization. Often manager's are in category #3. If you are in category #3 and people are talking about you I would be worried. You got your month at home but I would expect if you keep working from home and can't tangibly show what you are doing other than emails and instant messages, I would think your standing will decline at your company.



                          Note: Part of the gossip is your manager's fault. The manager should let people know the tasks you are doing and that you are completely available to continue your job even though you are at home. From the sounds of it, your manager hasn't communicated with people until after the fact which allows the gossip train to speed up.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Feb 2 '16 at 20:27









                          blankip

                          19.9k74781




                          19.9k74781






















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


























                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61491%2fconflicting-information-regarding-acceptable-practice-how-to-determine-if-doing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest

















































































                              Comments

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              What does second last employer means? [closed]

                              List of Gilmore Girls characters

                              Confectionery