Are there any statistics plotting likelihood of getting a call with an offer against time since the last interview?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am curious as to whether there is a correlation between the amount of time you have to wait before the company contacts you, and whether the answer will be a positive or a negative one.
interviewing
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am curious as to whether there is a correlation between the amount of time you have to wait before the company contacts you, and whether the answer will be a positive or a negative one.
interviewing
1
Given that a rather large fraction of companies never bother to give any sort of reply to a candidate that they're not extending the offer to, there must be a negative correlation.
– Justin Cave
Oct 18 '15 at 0:24
1
Probably, yeah there is a correlation. But it would be next to useless as each company will have their own process, and each position advertised would vary according to interview schedules
– HorusKol
Oct 18 '15 at 3:05
In my personal experience, there is no correlation. For example, I received a call asking me if I am still interested in accepting a job six months after I had interview.
– scaaahu
Oct 18 '15 at 7:45
Such a measurement would be effectively pointless for an individual-- what would you gain with such knowledge, how could that help you? A better measure of whether you personally get an offer is your understanding of how well the interview went.
– teego1967
Oct 18 '15 at 16:31
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am curious as to whether there is a correlation between the amount of time you have to wait before the company contacts you, and whether the answer will be a positive or a negative one.
interviewing
I am curious as to whether there is a correlation between the amount of time you have to wait before the company contacts you, and whether the answer will be a positive or a negative one.
interviewing
asked Oct 18 '15 at 0:07
Evil Washing Machine
6662716
6662716
1
Given that a rather large fraction of companies never bother to give any sort of reply to a candidate that they're not extending the offer to, there must be a negative correlation.
– Justin Cave
Oct 18 '15 at 0:24
1
Probably, yeah there is a correlation. But it would be next to useless as each company will have their own process, and each position advertised would vary according to interview schedules
– HorusKol
Oct 18 '15 at 3:05
In my personal experience, there is no correlation. For example, I received a call asking me if I am still interested in accepting a job six months after I had interview.
– scaaahu
Oct 18 '15 at 7:45
Such a measurement would be effectively pointless for an individual-- what would you gain with such knowledge, how could that help you? A better measure of whether you personally get an offer is your understanding of how well the interview went.
– teego1967
Oct 18 '15 at 16:31
suggest improvements |Â
1
Given that a rather large fraction of companies never bother to give any sort of reply to a candidate that they're not extending the offer to, there must be a negative correlation.
– Justin Cave
Oct 18 '15 at 0:24
1
Probably, yeah there is a correlation. But it would be next to useless as each company will have their own process, and each position advertised would vary according to interview schedules
– HorusKol
Oct 18 '15 at 3:05
In my personal experience, there is no correlation. For example, I received a call asking me if I am still interested in accepting a job six months after I had interview.
– scaaahu
Oct 18 '15 at 7:45
Such a measurement would be effectively pointless for an individual-- what would you gain with such knowledge, how could that help you? A better measure of whether you personally get an offer is your understanding of how well the interview went.
– teego1967
Oct 18 '15 at 16:31
1
1
Given that a rather large fraction of companies never bother to give any sort of reply to a candidate that they're not extending the offer to, there must be a negative correlation.
– Justin Cave
Oct 18 '15 at 0:24
Given that a rather large fraction of companies never bother to give any sort of reply to a candidate that they're not extending the offer to, there must be a negative correlation.
– Justin Cave
Oct 18 '15 at 0:24
1
1
Probably, yeah there is a correlation. But it would be next to useless as each company will have their own process, and each position advertised would vary according to interview schedules
– HorusKol
Oct 18 '15 at 3:05
Probably, yeah there is a correlation. But it would be next to useless as each company will have their own process, and each position advertised would vary according to interview schedules
– HorusKol
Oct 18 '15 at 3:05
In my personal experience, there is no correlation. For example, I received a call asking me if I am still interested in accepting a job six months after I had interview.
– scaaahu
Oct 18 '15 at 7:45
In my personal experience, there is no correlation. For example, I received a call asking me if I am still interested in accepting a job six months after I had interview.
– scaaahu
Oct 18 '15 at 7:45
Such a measurement would be effectively pointless for an individual-- what would you gain with such knowledge, how could that help you? A better measure of whether you personally get an offer is your understanding of how well the interview went.
– teego1967
Oct 18 '15 at 16:31
Such a measurement would be effectively pointless for an individual-- what would you gain with such knowledge, how could that help you? A better measure of whether you personally get an offer is your understanding of how well the interview went.
– teego1967
Oct 18 '15 at 16:31
suggest improvements |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Logically the shorter the period the more likely it is to be positive. If you are their first choice they are going to offer you the job and leave everyone else hanging until you accept or decline. If you decline then they contact their second choice and leave everyone else hanging until they accept or decline. And on and on.
However it may take them several weeks to decide on their first choice let alone second and third choices.
Does it really take them several weeks to decide on their first choice? Surely these things take a matter of hours to review a couple hours of interviews
– Evil Washing Machine
Oct 19 '15 at 21:11
@EvilWashingMachine Some decide immediately, some take ages. It's kind of a matter of corporate culture and circumstance.
– Myles
Oct 19 '15 at 22:25
@EvilWashingMachine if you have a hiring committee and each member has their own agenda, then it can take ages to decide on their first choice. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice is hired, then you win and I lose. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice has found another job, then you have not won and I have not lost. We continue the battle about second choice.
– emory
Oct 20 '15 at 11:02
suggest improvements |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
Logically the shorter the period the more likely it is to be positive. If you are their first choice they are going to offer you the job and leave everyone else hanging until you accept or decline. If you decline then they contact their second choice and leave everyone else hanging until they accept or decline. And on and on.
However it may take them several weeks to decide on their first choice let alone second and third choices.
Does it really take them several weeks to decide on their first choice? Surely these things take a matter of hours to review a couple hours of interviews
– Evil Washing Machine
Oct 19 '15 at 21:11
@EvilWashingMachine Some decide immediately, some take ages. It's kind of a matter of corporate culture and circumstance.
– Myles
Oct 19 '15 at 22:25
@EvilWashingMachine if you have a hiring committee and each member has their own agenda, then it can take ages to decide on their first choice. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice is hired, then you win and I lose. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice has found another job, then you have not won and I have not lost. We continue the battle about second choice.
– emory
Oct 20 '15 at 11:02
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
1
down vote
Logically the shorter the period the more likely it is to be positive. If you are their first choice they are going to offer you the job and leave everyone else hanging until you accept or decline. If you decline then they contact their second choice and leave everyone else hanging until they accept or decline. And on and on.
However it may take them several weeks to decide on their first choice let alone second and third choices.
Does it really take them several weeks to decide on their first choice? Surely these things take a matter of hours to review a couple hours of interviews
– Evil Washing Machine
Oct 19 '15 at 21:11
@EvilWashingMachine Some decide immediately, some take ages. It's kind of a matter of corporate culture and circumstance.
– Myles
Oct 19 '15 at 22:25
@EvilWashingMachine if you have a hiring committee and each member has their own agenda, then it can take ages to decide on their first choice. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice is hired, then you win and I lose. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice has found another job, then you have not won and I have not lost. We continue the battle about second choice.
– emory
Oct 20 '15 at 11:02
suggest improvements |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Logically the shorter the period the more likely it is to be positive. If you are their first choice they are going to offer you the job and leave everyone else hanging until you accept or decline. If you decline then they contact their second choice and leave everyone else hanging until they accept or decline. And on and on.
However it may take them several weeks to decide on their first choice let alone second and third choices.
Logically the shorter the period the more likely it is to be positive. If you are their first choice they are going to offer you the job and leave everyone else hanging until you accept or decline. If you decline then they contact their second choice and leave everyone else hanging until they accept or decline. And on and on.
However it may take them several weeks to decide on their first choice let alone second and third choices.
answered Oct 18 '15 at 15:22
Myles
25.4k658104
25.4k658104
Does it really take them several weeks to decide on their first choice? Surely these things take a matter of hours to review a couple hours of interviews
– Evil Washing Machine
Oct 19 '15 at 21:11
@EvilWashingMachine Some decide immediately, some take ages. It's kind of a matter of corporate culture and circumstance.
– Myles
Oct 19 '15 at 22:25
@EvilWashingMachine if you have a hiring committee and each member has their own agenda, then it can take ages to decide on their first choice. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice is hired, then you win and I lose. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice has found another job, then you have not won and I have not lost. We continue the battle about second choice.
– emory
Oct 20 '15 at 11:02
suggest improvements |Â
Does it really take them several weeks to decide on their first choice? Surely these things take a matter of hours to review a couple hours of interviews
– Evil Washing Machine
Oct 19 '15 at 21:11
@EvilWashingMachine Some decide immediately, some take ages. It's kind of a matter of corporate culture and circumstance.
– Myles
Oct 19 '15 at 22:25
@EvilWashingMachine if you have a hiring committee and each member has their own agenda, then it can take ages to decide on their first choice. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice is hired, then you win and I lose. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice has found another job, then you have not won and I have not lost. We continue the battle about second choice.
– emory
Oct 20 '15 at 11:02
Does it really take them several weeks to decide on their first choice? Surely these things take a matter of hours to review a couple hours of interviews
– Evil Washing Machine
Oct 19 '15 at 21:11
Does it really take them several weeks to decide on their first choice? Surely these things take a matter of hours to review a couple hours of interviews
– Evil Washing Machine
Oct 19 '15 at 21:11
@EvilWashingMachine Some decide immediately, some take ages. It's kind of a matter of corporate culture and circumstance.
– Myles
Oct 19 '15 at 22:25
@EvilWashingMachine Some decide immediately, some take ages. It's kind of a matter of corporate culture and circumstance.
– Myles
Oct 19 '15 at 22:25
@EvilWashingMachine if you have a hiring committee and each member has their own agenda, then it can take ages to decide on their first choice. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice is hired, then you win and I lose. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice has found another job, then you have not won and I have not lost. We continue the battle about second choice.
– emory
Oct 20 '15 at 11:02
@EvilWashingMachine if you have a hiring committee and each member has their own agenda, then it can take ages to decide on their first choice. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice is hired, then you win and I lose. If the committee selects your first choice over mine and your first choice has found another job, then you have not won and I have not lost. We continue the battle about second choice.
– emory
Oct 20 '15 at 11:02
suggest improvements |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56102%2fare-there-any-statistics-plotting-likelihood-of-getting-a-call-with-an-offer-aga%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
Given that a rather large fraction of companies never bother to give any sort of reply to a candidate that they're not extending the offer to, there must be a negative correlation.
– Justin Cave
Oct 18 '15 at 0:24
1
Probably, yeah there is a correlation. But it would be next to useless as each company will have their own process, and each position advertised would vary according to interview schedules
– HorusKol
Oct 18 '15 at 3:05
In my personal experience, there is no correlation. For example, I received a call asking me if I am still interested in accepting a job six months after I had interview.
– scaaahu
Oct 18 '15 at 7:45
Such a measurement would be effectively pointless for an individual-- what would you gain with such knowledge, how could that help you? A better measure of whether you personally get an offer is your understanding of how well the interview went.
– teego1967
Oct 18 '15 at 16:31