open books of accounts to new company

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I am in a process of several interviews with this company that is direct competitor of my actual one. They asked me as part of the process to reveal my account base, since they want to know if they have current sales person working on the same accounts I have relationship.



I am not comfortable doing this since I was not offered a position yet, even though this company is a lot longer in the market. The manager seems pretty honest, he is doing this for over 23 years. He is telling me that he does not want me to get frustrated if the accounts I have wouldn't be the same since there are other people working on them. What should I do?







share|improve this question






















  • Just tell him you would not be frustrated working same or different accounts
    – paparazzo
    Dec 13 '15 at 8:07







  • 8




    They are conning you.
    – Deer Hunter
    Dec 13 '15 at 8:47






  • 1




    I don't have the experience to answer this for your industry, but it certainly seems dishonest. If that's information you're even allowed to give (and not protected by your current contract/NDA) I would only do so conditional on a signed offer, preferably even an actual contract to avoid an at-will dismissal.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Dec 13 '15 at 10:57







  • 2




    Personally if a person/company asked for that information I would run to the hills. They are not worth working for even asking for that information. That is my opinion
    – Ed Heal
    Dec 13 '15 at 14:07










  • If you signed a NDA when you were hired (you probably did) you would probably be breaching it if you shared a list of your clients with the manager. May be a good idea to see if you can find whatever you signed so you can become familiar with WHAT is going to be considered confidential information.
    – Jack Sinclair
    Dec 14 '15 at 16:57
















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I am in a process of several interviews with this company that is direct competitor of my actual one. They asked me as part of the process to reveal my account base, since they want to know if they have current sales person working on the same accounts I have relationship.



I am not comfortable doing this since I was not offered a position yet, even though this company is a lot longer in the market. The manager seems pretty honest, he is doing this for over 23 years. He is telling me that he does not want me to get frustrated if the accounts I have wouldn't be the same since there are other people working on them. What should I do?







share|improve this question






















  • Just tell him you would not be frustrated working same or different accounts
    – paparazzo
    Dec 13 '15 at 8:07







  • 8




    They are conning you.
    – Deer Hunter
    Dec 13 '15 at 8:47






  • 1




    I don't have the experience to answer this for your industry, but it certainly seems dishonest. If that's information you're even allowed to give (and not protected by your current contract/NDA) I would only do so conditional on a signed offer, preferably even an actual contract to avoid an at-will dismissal.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Dec 13 '15 at 10:57







  • 2




    Personally if a person/company asked for that information I would run to the hills. They are not worth working for even asking for that information. That is my opinion
    – Ed Heal
    Dec 13 '15 at 14:07










  • If you signed a NDA when you were hired (you probably did) you would probably be breaching it if you shared a list of your clients with the manager. May be a good idea to see if you can find whatever you signed so you can become familiar with WHAT is going to be considered confidential information.
    – Jack Sinclair
    Dec 14 '15 at 16:57












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I am in a process of several interviews with this company that is direct competitor of my actual one. They asked me as part of the process to reveal my account base, since they want to know if they have current sales person working on the same accounts I have relationship.



I am not comfortable doing this since I was not offered a position yet, even though this company is a lot longer in the market. The manager seems pretty honest, he is doing this for over 23 years. He is telling me that he does not want me to get frustrated if the accounts I have wouldn't be the same since there are other people working on them. What should I do?







share|improve this question














I am in a process of several interviews with this company that is direct competitor of my actual one. They asked me as part of the process to reveal my account base, since they want to know if they have current sales person working on the same accounts I have relationship.



I am not comfortable doing this since I was not offered a position yet, even though this company is a lot longer in the market. The manager seems pretty honest, he is doing this for over 23 years. He is telling me that he does not want me to get frustrated if the accounts I have wouldn't be the same since there are other people working on them. What should I do?









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 13 '15 at 11:34









gnat

3,24773066




3,24773066










asked Dec 13 '15 at 6:07









Katia

191




191











  • Just tell him you would not be frustrated working same or different accounts
    – paparazzo
    Dec 13 '15 at 8:07







  • 8




    They are conning you.
    – Deer Hunter
    Dec 13 '15 at 8:47






  • 1




    I don't have the experience to answer this for your industry, but it certainly seems dishonest. If that's information you're even allowed to give (and not protected by your current contract/NDA) I would only do so conditional on a signed offer, preferably even an actual contract to avoid an at-will dismissal.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Dec 13 '15 at 10:57







  • 2




    Personally if a person/company asked for that information I would run to the hills. They are not worth working for even asking for that information. That is my opinion
    – Ed Heal
    Dec 13 '15 at 14:07










  • If you signed a NDA when you were hired (you probably did) you would probably be breaching it if you shared a list of your clients with the manager. May be a good idea to see if you can find whatever you signed so you can become familiar with WHAT is going to be considered confidential information.
    – Jack Sinclair
    Dec 14 '15 at 16:57
















  • Just tell him you would not be frustrated working same or different accounts
    – paparazzo
    Dec 13 '15 at 8:07







  • 8




    They are conning you.
    – Deer Hunter
    Dec 13 '15 at 8:47






  • 1




    I don't have the experience to answer this for your industry, but it certainly seems dishonest. If that's information you're even allowed to give (and not protected by your current contract/NDA) I would only do so conditional on a signed offer, preferably even an actual contract to avoid an at-will dismissal.
    – Lilienthal♦
    Dec 13 '15 at 10:57







  • 2




    Personally if a person/company asked for that information I would run to the hills. They are not worth working for even asking for that information. That is my opinion
    – Ed Heal
    Dec 13 '15 at 14:07










  • If you signed a NDA when you were hired (you probably did) you would probably be breaching it if you shared a list of your clients with the manager. May be a good idea to see if you can find whatever you signed so you can become familiar with WHAT is going to be considered confidential information.
    – Jack Sinclair
    Dec 14 '15 at 16:57















Just tell him you would not be frustrated working same or different accounts
– paparazzo
Dec 13 '15 at 8:07





Just tell him you would not be frustrated working same or different accounts
– paparazzo
Dec 13 '15 at 8:07





8




8




They are conning you.
– Deer Hunter
Dec 13 '15 at 8:47




They are conning you.
– Deer Hunter
Dec 13 '15 at 8:47




1




1




I don't have the experience to answer this for your industry, but it certainly seems dishonest. If that's information you're even allowed to give (and not protected by your current contract/NDA) I would only do so conditional on a signed offer, preferably even an actual contract to avoid an at-will dismissal.
– Lilienthal♦
Dec 13 '15 at 10:57





I don't have the experience to answer this for your industry, but it certainly seems dishonest. If that's information you're even allowed to give (and not protected by your current contract/NDA) I would only do so conditional on a signed offer, preferably even an actual contract to avoid an at-will dismissal.
– Lilienthal♦
Dec 13 '15 at 10:57





2




2




Personally if a person/company asked for that information I would run to the hills. They are not worth working for even asking for that information. That is my opinion
– Ed Heal
Dec 13 '15 at 14:07




Personally if a person/company asked for that information I would run to the hills. They are not worth working for even asking for that information. That is my opinion
– Ed Heal
Dec 13 '15 at 14:07












If you signed a NDA when you were hired (you probably did) you would probably be breaching it if you shared a list of your clients with the manager. May be a good idea to see if you can find whatever you signed so you can become familiar with WHAT is going to be considered confidential information.
– Jack Sinclair
Dec 14 '15 at 16:57




If you signed a NDA when you were hired (you probably did) you would probably be breaching it if you shared a list of your clients with the manager. May be a good idea to see if you can find whatever you signed so you can become familiar with WHAT is going to be considered confidential information.
– Jack Sinclair
Dec 14 '15 at 16:57










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













Just tell him that it is not your property and you cannot do it. If he insists, then forget trying to get a job at that company. Any hint of dishonesty in the finance professions is bad for your career.



They might thank you for the info, but they would not hire you if you did, they'd be too worried about what you'd do with their information.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Your potential new employer is (unnecessarily?) putting you in the middle of both a legal and ethical dilemma.



    Legally, it's simple: you may have signed legal documents upon your acceptance (or anytime thereafter) preventing you from doing so and violating it would put you in legal hot water.



    Ethically, you have an inherent commitment with your current employer to develop accounts for them not anyone else - this is what you are being paid to do.



    You can diffuse the situation by stating simply that you cannot divulge information that is property of your current employer and that he should understand if the situation were reversed. Being loyal to one company doesn't mean betraying the trust of another.



    Looking at this from the hiring manager's perspective....



    Asking you that question is not about your "comfort." It's about seeing if you are going to bring any new accounts to the table. Why would they hire you if they already have your accounts as current customers? Until he hires (makes a commitment to you) he's in the same position he was yesterday - he doesn't know what accounts he doesn't have. So, why would he not attempt to get the milk for free if someone is already willing to give up the cow?



    Lastly, tenure is in no way an indicator of trustworthiness. Having been "around the block" makes you experienced, it doesn't make you honest.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Maybe it's a test of ethics. If you agree and provide information that you should not, then they know you can't be trusted with their information. Doubtful, I know, but that's certainly one thing they'd learn about OP if they did as asked.
      – PoloHoleSet
      Aug 18 '17 at 14:34










    • @PoloHoleSet - exactly. That's why I put (unnecessarily?) in the first sentence!
      – Allan
      Aug 18 '17 at 14:40










    • sadly so many companies are lacking in their own ethics that it is much more likely for them to be fishing for improper information than testing the candidate's fortitude, but the possibility does exist. Still, if this company is so lacking that they make it a make-or-break criteria, it's not one OP will probably want to work for, anyway, so losing the potential position over doing what is ethical won't be that big a loss, in the long run.
      – PoloHoleSet
      Aug 18 '17 at 14:42











    • I that scenario - it's a lose-lose for the OP
      – Allan
      Aug 18 '17 at 14:47










    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59305%2fopen-books-of-accounts-to-new-company%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Just tell him that it is not your property and you cannot do it. If he insists, then forget trying to get a job at that company. Any hint of dishonesty in the finance professions is bad for your career.



    They might thank you for the info, but they would not hire you if you did, they'd be too worried about what you'd do with their information.






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      6
      down vote













      Just tell him that it is not your property and you cannot do it. If he insists, then forget trying to get a job at that company. Any hint of dishonesty in the finance professions is bad for your career.



      They might thank you for the info, but they would not hire you if you did, they'd be too worried about what you'd do with their information.






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        6
        down vote










        up vote
        6
        down vote









        Just tell him that it is not your property and you cannot do it. If he insists, then forget trying to get a job at that company. Any hint of dishonesty in the finance professions is bad for your career.



        They might thank you for the info, but they would not hire you if you did, they'd be too worried about what you'd do with their information.






        share|improve this answer












        Just tell him that it is not your property and you cannot do it. If he insists, then forget trying to get a job at that company. Any hint of dishonesty in the finance professions is bad for your career.



        They might thank you for the info, but they would not hire you if you did, they'd be too worried about what you'd do with their information.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 13 '15 at 9:01









        Kilisi

        94.7k50216376




        94.7k50216376






















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Your potential new employer is (unnecessarily?) putting you in the middle of both a legal and ethical dilemma.



            Legally, it's simple: you may have signed legal documents upon your acceptance (or anytime thereafter) preventing you from doing so and violating it would put you in legal hot water.



            Ethically, you have an inherent commitment with your current employer to develop accounts for them not anyone else - this is what you are being paid to do.



            You can diffuse the situation by stating simply that you cannot divulge information that is property of your current employer and that he should understand if the situation were reversed. Being loyal to one company doesn't mean betraying the trust of another.



            Looking at this from the hiring manager's perspective....



            Asking you that question is not about your "comfort." It's about seeing if you are going to bring any new accounts to the table. Why would they hire you if they already have your accounts as current customers? Until he hires (makes a commitment to you) he's in the same position he was yesterday - he doesn't know what accounts he doesn't have. So, why would he not attempt to get the milk for free if someone is already willing to give up the cow?



            Lastly, tenure is in no way an indicator of trustworthiness. Having been "around the block" makes you experienced, it doesn't make you honest.






            share|improve this answer






















            • Maybe it's a test of ethics. If you agree and provide information that you should not, then they know you can't be trusted with their information. Doubtful, I know, but that's certainly one thing they'd learn about OP if they did as asked.
              – PoloHoleSet
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:34










            • @PoloHoleSet - exactly. That's why I put (unnecessarily?) in the first sentence!
              – Allan
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:40










            • sadly so many companies are lacking in their own ethics that it is much more likely for them to be fishing for improper information than testing the candidate's fortitude, but the possibility does exist. Still, if this company is so lacking that they make it a make-or-break criteria, it's not one OP will probably want to work for, anyway, so losing the potential position over doing what is ethical won't be that big a loss, in the long run.
              – PoloHoleSet
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:42











            • I that scenario - it's a lose-lose for the OP
              – Allan
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:47














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Your potential new employer is (unnecessarily?) putting you in the middle of both a legal and ethical dilemma.



            Legally, it's simple: you may have signed legal documents upon your acceptance (or anytime thereafter) preventing you from doing so and violating it would put you in legal hot water.



            Ethically, you have an inherent commitment with your current employer to develop accounts for them not anyone else - this is what you are being paid to do.



            You can diffuse the situation by stating simply that you cannot divulge information that is property of your current employer and that he should understand if the situation were reversed. Being loyal to one company doesn't mean betraying the trust of another.



            Looking at this from the hiring manager's perspective....



            Asking you that question is not about your "comfort." It's about seeing if you are going to bring any new accounts to the table. Why would they hire you if they already have your accounts as current customers? Until he hires (makes a commitment to you) he's in the same position he was yesterday - he doesn't know what accounts he doesn't have. So, why would he not attempt to get the milk for free if someone is already willing to give up the cow?



            Lastly, tenure is in no way an indicator of trustworthiness. Having been "around the block" makes you experienced, it doesn't make you honest.






            share|improve this answer






















            • Maybe it's a test of ethics. If you agree and provide information that you should not, then they know you can't be trusted with their information. Doubtful, I know, but that's certainly one thing they'd learn about OP if they did as asked.
              – PoloHoleSet
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:34










            • @PoloHoleSet - exactly. That's why I put (unnecessarily?) in the first sentence!
              – Allan
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:40










            • sadly so many companies are lacking in their own ethics that it is much more likely for them to be fishing for improper information than testing the candidate's fortitude, but the possibility does exist. Still, if this company is so lacking that they make it a make-or-break criteria, it's not one OP will probably want to work for, anyway, so losing the potential position over doing what is ethical won't be that big a loss, in the long run.
              – PoloHoleSet
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:42











            • I that scenario - it's a lose-lose for the OP
              – Allan
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:47












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Your potential new employer is (unnecessarily?) putting you in the middle of both a legal and ethical dilemma.



            Legally, it's simple: you may have signed legal documents upon your acceptance (or anytime thereafter) preventing you from doing so and violating it would put you in legal hot water.



            Ethically, you have an inherent commitment with your current employer to develop accounts for them not anyone else - this is what you are being paid to do.



            You can diffuse the situation by stating simply that you cannot divulge information that is property of your current employer and that he should understand if the situation were reversed. Being loyal to one company doesn't mean betraying the trust of another.



            Looking at this from the hiring manager's perspective....



            Asking you that question is not about your "comfort." It's about seeing if you are going to bring any new accounts to the table. Why would they hire you if they already have your accounts as current customers? Until he hires (makes a commitment to you) he's in the same position he was yesterday - he doesn't know what accounts he doesn't have. So, why would he not attempt to get the milk for free if someone is already willing to give up the cow?



            Lastly, tenure is in no way an indicator of trustworthiness. Having been "around the block" makes you experienced, it doesn't make you honest.






            share|improve this answer














            Your potential new employer is (unnecessarily?) putting you in the middle of both a legal and ethical dilemma.



            Legally, it's simple: you may have signed legal documents upon your acceptance (or anytime thereafter) preventing you from doing so and violating it would put you in legal hot water.



            Ethically, you have an inherent commitment with your current employer to develop accounts for them not anyone else - this is what you are being paid to do.



            You can diffuse the situation by stating simply that you cannot divulge information that is property of your current employer and that he should understand if the situation were reversed. Being loyal to one company doesn't mean betraying the trust of another.



            Looking at this from the hiring manager's perspective....



            Asking you that question is not about your "comfort." It's about seeing if you are going to bring any new accounts to the table. Why would they hire you if they already have your accounts as current customers? Until he hires (makes a commitment to you) he's in the same position he was yesterday - he doesn't know what accounts he doesn't have. So, why would he not attempt to get the milk for free if someone is already willing to give up the cow?



            Lastly, tenure is in no way an indicator of trustworthiness. Having been "around the block" makes you experienced, it doesn't make you honest.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Aug 18 '17 at 12:51

























            answered Aug 18 '17 at 12:38









            Allan

            90229




            90229











            • Maybe it's a test of ethics. If you agree and provide information that you should not, then they know you can't be trusted with their information. Doubtful, I know, but that's certainly one thing they'd learn about OP if they did as asked.
              – PoloHoleSet
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:34










            • @PoloHoleSet - exactly. That's why I put (unnecessarily?) in the first sentence!
              – Allan
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:40










            • sadly so many companies are lacking in their own ethics that it is much more likely for them to be fishing for improper information than testing the candidate's fortitude, but the possibility does exist. Still, if this company is so lacking that they make it a make-or-break criteria, it's not one OP will probably want to work for, anyway, so losing the potential position over doing what is ethical won't be that big a loss, in the long run.
              – PoloHoleSet
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:42











            • I that scenario - it's a lose-lose for the OP
              – Allan
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:47
















            • Maybe it's a test of ethics. If you agree and provide information that you should not, then they know you can't be trusted with their information. Doubtful, I know, but that's certainly one thing they'd learn about OP if they did as asked.
              – PoloHoleSet
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:34










            • @PoloHoleSet - exactly. That's why I put (unnecessarily?) in the first sentence!
              – Allan
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:40










            • sadly so many companies are lacking in their own ethics that it is much more likely for them to be fishing for improper information than testing the candidate's fortitude, but the possibility does exist. Still, if this company is so lacking that they make it a make-or-break criteria, it's not one OP will probably want to work for, anyway, so losing the potential position over doing what is ethical won't be that big a loss, in the long run.
              – PoloHoleSet
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:42











            • I that scenario - it's a lose-lose for the OP
              – Allan
              Aug 18 '17 at 14:47















            Maybe it's a test of ethics. If you agree and provide information that you should not, then they know you can't be trusted with their information. Doubtful, I know, but that's certainly one thing they'd learn about OP if they did as asked.
            – PoloHoleSet
            Aug 18 '17 at 14:34




            Maybe it's a test of ethics. If you agree and provide information that you should not, then they know you can't be trusted with their information. Doubtful, I know, but that's certainly one thing they'd learn about OP if they did as asked.
            – PoloHoleSet
            Aug 18 '17 at 14:34












            @PoloHoleSet - exactly. That's why I put (unnecessarily?) in the first sentence!
            – Allan
            Aug 18 '17 at 14:40




            @PoloHoleSet - exactly. That's why I put (unnecessarily?) in the first sentence!
            – Allan
            Aug 18 '17 at 14:40












            sadly so many companies are lacking in their own ethics that it is much more likely for them to be fishing for improper information than testing the candidate's fortitude, but the possibility does exist. Still, if this company is so lacking that they make it a make-or-break criteria, it's not one OP will probably want to work for, anyway, so losing the potential position over doing what is ethical won't be that big a loss, in the long run.
            – PoloHoleSet
            Aug 18 '17 at 14:42





            sadly so many companies are lacking in their own ethics that it is much more likely for them to be fishing for improper information than testing the candidate's fortitude, but the possibility does exist. Still, if this company is so lacking that they make it a make-or-break criteria, it's not one OP will probably want to work for, anyway, so losing the potential position over doing what is ethical won't be that big a loss, in the long run.
            – PoloHoleSet
            Aug 18 '17 at 14:42













            I that scenario - it's a lose-lose for the OP
            – Allan
            Aug 18 '17 at 14:47




            I that scenario - it's a lose-lose for the OP
            – Allan
            Aug 18 '17 at 14:47












             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f59305%2fopen-books-of-accounts-to-new-company%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            Confectionery