Can you drop one hand from a two-handed weapon to draw and use a single-handed weapon next turn?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












A situation came up in our last session of D&D 5e where another character wanted to use a single-handed weapon after using a two handed weapon attack.



She made the attack with a two handed weapon on one turn and wanted to draw her single handed weapon and attack with that on the next turn. She didn't want to drop the two handed weapon, but wanted to hold it in her off hand and attack with the single handed weapon in her main hand.



The Storyteller (which is what my group calls the DM) said she had to drop the two-handed weapon.



We argued that she wasn't attacking with it and just keeping it in her off hand as a carry item and the Storyteller wanted us to find a ruling on that specific use, as he was of the understanding that a two-handed weapon required two hands at all times.



Where can we find such rulings? Is there one?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Apologies, I'm new to this site and the system and used suggested tags. There were no suggestions for two-handed-weapons. I did add a clarification on the original posting section.
    – Dragon-Fury-X01
    35 mins ago






  • 1




    @Dragon-Fury-X01 Thank you for clarifying! No need to apologize at all, the site has a bit of a learning curve and we all went through it :) I have edited to make your additions flow better in your question, feel free to tweak them if I messed anything up.
    – Rubiksmoose
    30 mins ago










  • @rubiksmoose: Thank you, that format works for me and does indeed clarify what I'm trying to say.
    – Dragon-Fury-X01
    29 mins ago






  • 2




    Related to Holding a longbow (or other 2H weapon) and attacking with a shortsword (or other 1H weapon)? (but not the same question (despite that title), since this is asking about something already known in that question, and that question is asking about a particular action sequence irrelevant to this question).
    – SevenSidedDie♦
    26 mins ago














up vote
5
down vote

favorite












A situation came up in our last session of D&D 5e where another character wanted to use a single-handed weapon after using a two handed weapon attack.



She made the attack with a two handed weapon on one turn and wanted to draw her single handed weapon and attack with that on the next turn. She didn't want to drop the two handed weapon, but wanted to hold it in her off hand and attack with the single handed weapon in her main hand.



The Storyteller (which is what my group calls the DM) said she had to drop the two-handed weapon.



We argued that she wasn't attacking with it and just keeping it in her off hand as a carry item and the Storyteller wanted us to find a ruling on that specific use, as he was of the understanding that a two-handed weapon required two hands at all times.



Where can we find such rulings? Is there one?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Apologies, I'm new to this site and the system and used suggested tags. There were no suggestions for two-handed-weapons. I did add a clarification on the original posting section.
    – Dragon-Fury-X01
    35 mins ago






  • 1




    @Dragon-Fury-X01 Thank you for clarifying! No need to apologize at all, the site has a bit of a learning curve and we all went through it :) I have edited to make your additions flow better in your question, feel free to tweak them if I messed anything up.
    – Rubiksmoose
    30 mins ago










  • @rubiksmoose: Thank you, that format works for me and does indeed clarify what I'm trying to say.
    – Dragon-Fury-X01
    29 mins ago






  • 2




    Related to Holding a longbow (or other 2H weapon) and attacking with a shortsword (or other 1H weapon)? (but not the same question (despite that title), since this is asking about something already known in that question, and that question is asking about a particular action sequence irrelevant to this question).
    – SevenSidedDie♦
    26 mins ago












up vote
5
down vote

favorite









up vote
5
down vote

favorite











A situation came up in our last session of D&D 5e where another character wanted to use a single-handed weapon after using a two handed weapon attack.



She made the attack with a two handed weapon on one turn and wanted to draw her single handed weapon and attack with that on the next turn. She didn't want to drop the two handed weapon, but wanted to hold it in her off hand and attack with the single handed weapon in her main hand.



The Storyteller (which is what my group calls the DM) said she had to drop the two-handed weapon.



We argued that she wasn't attacking with it and just keeping it in her off hand as a carry item and the Storyteller wanted us to find a ruling on that specific use, as he was of the understanding that a two-handed weapon required two hands at all times.



Where can we find such rulings? Is there one?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











A situation came up in our last session of D&D 5e where another character wanted to use a single-handed weapon after using a two handed weapon attack.



She made the attack with a two handed weapon on one turn and wanted to draw her single handed weapon and attack with that on the next turn. She didn't want to drop the two handed weapon, but wanted to hold it in her off hand and attack with the single handed weapon in her main hand.



The Storyteller (which is what my group calls the DM) said she had to drop the two-handed weapon.



We argued that she wasn't attacking with it and just keeping it in her off hand as a carry item and the Storyteller wanted us to find a ruling on that specific use, as he was of the understanding that a two-handed weapon required two hands at all times.



Where can we find such rulings? Is there one?







dnd-5e weapons






share|improve this question









New contributor




Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 9 mins ago









SevenSidedDie♦

201k26641921




201k26641921






New contributor




Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Dragon-Fury-X01

263




263




New contributor




Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Apologies, I'm new to this site and the system and used suggested tags. There were no suggestions for two-handed-weapons. I did add a clarification on the original posting section.
    – Dragon-Fury-X01
    35 mins ago






  • 1




    @Dragon-Fury-X01 Thank you for clarifying! No need to apologize at all, the site has a bit of a learning curve and we all went through it :) I have edited to make your additions flow better in your question, feel free to tweak them if I messed anything up.
    – Rubiksmoose
    30 mins ago










  • @rubiksmoose: Thank you, that format works for me and does indeed clarify what I'm trying to say.
    – Dragon-Fury-X01
    29 mins ago






  • 2




    Related to Holding a longbow (or other 2H weapon) and attacking with a shortsword (or other 1H weapon)? (but not the same question (despite that title), since this is asking about something already known in that question, and that question is asking about a particular action sequence irrelevant to this question).
    – SevenSidedDie♦
    26 mins ago
















  • Apologies, I'm new to this site and the system and used suggested tags. There were no suggestions for two-handed-weapons. I did add a clarification on the original posting section.
    – Dragon-Fury-X01
    35 mins ago






  • 1




    @Dragon-Fury-X01 Thank you for clarifying! No need to apologize at all, the site has a bit of a learning curve and we all went through it :) I have edited to make your additions flow better in your question, feel free to tweak them if I messed anything up.
    – Rubiksmoose
    30 mins ago










  • @rubiksmoose: Thank you, that format works for me and does indeed clarify what I'm trying to say.
    – Dragon-Fury-X01
    29 mins ago






  • 2




    Related to Holding a longbow (or other 2H weapon) and attacking with a shortsword (or other 1H weapon)? (but not the same question (despite that title), since this is asking about something already known in that question, and that question is asking about a particular action sequence irrelevant to this question).
    – SevenSidedDie♦
    26 mins ago















Apologies, I'm new to this site and the system and used suggested tags. There were no suggestions for two-handed-weapons. I did add a clarification on the original posting section.
– Dragon-Fury-X01
35 mins ago




Apologies, I'm new to this site and the system and used suggested tags. There were no suggestions for two-handed-weapons. I did add a clarification on the original posting section.
– Dragon-Fury-X01
35 mins ago




1




1




@Dragon-Fury-X01 Thank you for clarifying! No need to apologize at all, the site has a bit of a learning curve and we all went through it :) I have edited to make your additions flow better in your question, feel free to tweak them if I messed anything up.
– Rubiksmoose
30 mins ago




@Dragon-Fury-X01 Thank you for clarifying! No need to apologize at all, the site has a bit of a learning curve and we all went through it :) I have edited to make your additions flow better in your question, feel free to tweak them if I messed anything up.
– Rubiksmoose
30 mins ago












@rubiksmoose: Thank you, that format works for me and does indeed clarify what I'm trying to say.
– Dragon-Fury-X01
29 mins ago




@rubiksmoose: Thank you, that format works for me and does indeed clarify what I'm trying to say.
– Dragon-Fury-X01
29 mins ago




2




2




Related to Holding a longbow (or other 2H weapon) and attacking with a shortsword (or other 1H weapon)? (but not the same question (despite that title), since this is asking about something already known in that question, and that question is asking about a particular action sequence irrelevant to this question).
– SevenSidedDie♦
26 mins ago




Related to Holding a longbow (or other 2H weapon) and attacking with a shortsword (or other 1H weapon)? (but not the same question (despite that title), since this is asking about something already known in that question, and that question is asking about a particular action sequence irrelevant to this question).
– SevenSidedDie♦
26 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













Yes, she can hold a two-handed weapon in one hand while she attacks with the one-handed weapon



The two-handed feature for weapons says:




Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use.




However there is errata to the PHB which says:




Two-Handed (p. 147). This property is relevant only when you attack
with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.




Thus, a two-handed weapon takes two hands only to use, but not to hold.



There are two equally valid sequences of actions they can use to achieve this:



  1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

  2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

  3. Draw one-handed weapon (free object interaction)

  4. Next turn: attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

Alternatively:



  1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

  2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

  3. Next turn: draw and attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

Either way this sequence is completely allowed by the rules.



Side Note: There is no such thing as "main" or "off" hands in 5e mechanically (in case you were unaware). So it doesn't matter which hand holds the weapon and which hand attacks.






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    You cannot use two-weapon fighting like that



    This is what the book has to say about two-weapon fighting:




    When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
    that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
    with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
    hand. (PHB 195)




    What the player has proposed is illegal on many accounts:



    • The weapon they used for the Attack action is not used one-handed

    • They were not holding the second weapon in their other hand when they made the first attack.

    Thus you cannot take advantage of two-weapon fighting like this.



    Note: Without the secondary, bonus action attack this is legal. Ie. you can rest a two-handed weapon in one hand after attacking and draw another weapon with your now-free hand.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3




      The question has been updated to clarify that two-weapon fighting is not used so you may want to revise this answer
      – Sdjz
      27 mins ago










    • It's not two-weapon fighting, though. It's a normal attack.
      – HellSaint
      17 mins ago










    • The question doesn't mention two-weapon fighting, the attacks are on separate turns.
      – David Coffron
      16 mins ago

















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    The closest ruling that comes to mind is the encumbrance ruling, specifically on page 176 of the PHB:




    Carrying Capacity. Your carrying capacity is your Strength score multiplied by 15, This is the weight (in pounds) that you can carry, which is high enough that most characters don't usually have to worry about it.



    Push, Drag, or Lift. You can push drag or lift [emphasis mine] a weight in pounds up to twice your carrying capacity (or 30 times your Strength score)...




    Given the above and that the heaviest melee weapon in the PHB, the pike, weighs only 18 pounds, per RAW, the character in question can, in fact, lift, drag, carry, or otherwise grip the idle weapon in one hand without dropping it. (Barring any crazy amounts of gear already shouldered by the character or a ridiculously low strength score).



    It's also worth noting the rules on two handed weapons (PHB p. 147) and that you only need two hands on it to use it. Nothing is mentioned about a character being unable hold it in one hand or to let it hang or drag.




    Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use [emphasis mine].




    Assuming that the character had an extra attack to make, is trying to draw the one handed weapon after swinging the two hander, and is not trying to manipulate the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, everything is doable.



    I personally disagree with the decision made by the ST/GM/DM in this situation, but they are the one running the game and it is their call. I would politely bring the above rules to their attention and make your case.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.













    • 2




      Welcome to RPG.SE! You may be interested in taking our tour to learn more about us. We're still trying to nail down exactly what OP is asking here, but the rules around encumbrance really aren't the issue here. You can also look at this question to help guide you on what it means to use vs hold a two-handed weapon.
      – NautArch
      1 hour ago










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135182%2fcan-you-drop-one-hand-from-a-two-handed-weapon-to-draw-and-use-a-single-handed-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Yes, she can hold a two-handed weapon in one hand while she attacks with the one-handed weapon



    The two-handed feature for weapons says:




    Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use.




    However there is errata to the PHB which says:




    Two-Handed (p. 147). This property is relevant only when you attack
    with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.




    Thus, a two-handed weapon takes two hands only to use, but not to hold.



    There are two equally valid sequences of actions they can use to achieve this:



    1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

    2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

    3. Draw one-handed weapon (free object interaction)

    4. Next turn: attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

    Alternatively:



    1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

    2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

    3. Next turn: draw and attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

    Either way this sequence is completely allowed by the rules.



    Side Note: There is no such thing as "main" or "off" hands in 5e mechanically (in case you were unaware). So it doesn't matter which hand holds the weapon and which hand attacks.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      6
      down vote













      Yes, she can hold a two-handed weapon in one hand while she attacks with the one-handed weapon



      The two-handed feature for weapons says:




      Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use.




      However there is errata to the PHB which says:




      Two-Handed (p. 147). This property is relevant only when you attack
      with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.




      Thus, a two-handed weapon takes two hands only to use, but not to hold.



      There are two equally valid sequences of actions they can use to achieve this:



      1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

      2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

      3. Draw one-handed weapon (free object interaction)

      4. Next turn: attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

      Alternatively:



      1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

      2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

      3. Next turn: draw and attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

      Either way this sequence is completely allowed by the rules.



      Side Note: There is no such thing as "main" or "off" hands in 5e mechanically (in case you were unaware). So it doesn't matter which hand holds the weapon and which hand attacks.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        6
        down vote










        up vote
        6
        down vote









        Yes, she can hold a two-handed weapon in one hand while she attacks with the one-handed weapon



        The two-handed feature for weapons says:




        Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use.




        However there is errata to the PHB which says:




        Two-Handed (p. 147). This property is relevant only when you attack
        with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.




        Thus, a two-handed weapon takes two hands only to use, but not to hold.



        There are two equally valid sequences of actions they can use to achieve this:



        1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

        2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

        3. Draw one-handed weapon (free object interaction)

        4. Next turn: attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

        Alternatively:



        1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

        2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

        3. Next turn: draw and attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

        Either way this sequence is completely allowed by the rules.



        Side Note: There is no such thing as "main" or "off" hands in 5e mechanically (in case you were unaware). So it doesn't matter which hand holds the weapon and which hand attacks.






        share|improve this answer














        Yes, she can hold a two-handed weapon in one hand while she attacks with the one-handed weapon



        The two-handed feature for weapons says:




        Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use.




        However there is errata to the PHB which says:




        Two-Handed (p. 147). This property is relevant only when you attack
        with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.




        Thus, a two-handed weapon takes two hands only to use, but not to hold.



        There are two equally valid sequences of actions they can use to achieve this:



        1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

        2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

        3. Draw one-handed weapon (free object interaction)

        4. Next turn: attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

        Alternatively:



        1. Attack with two-handed weapon (1 action)

        2. Release one hand from two-handed weapon (non-action)

        3. Next turn: draw and attack with one-handed weapon (1 action)

        Either way this sequence is completely allowed by the rules.



        Side Note: There is no such thing as "main" or "off" hands in 5e mechanically (in case you were unaware). So it doesn't matter which hand holds the weapon and which hand attacks.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 5 mins ago









        Sdjz

        9,45434590




        9,45434590










        answered 21 mins ago









        Rubiksmoose

        41.8k5205317




        41.8k5205317






















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            You cannot use two-weapon fighting like that



            This is what the book has to say about two-weapon fighting:




            When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
            that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
            with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
            hand. (PHB 195)




            What the player has proposed is illegal on many accounts:



            • The weapon they used for the Attack action is not used one-handed

            • They were not holding the second weapon in their other hand when they made the first attack.

            Thus you cannot take advantage of two-weapon fighting like this.



            Note: Without the secondary, bonus action attack this is legal. Ie. you can rest a two-handed weapon in one hand after attacking and draw another weapon with your now-free hand.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              The question has been updated to clarify that two-weapon fighting is not used so you may want to revise this answer
              – Sdjz
              27 mins ago










            • It's not two-weapon fighting, though. It's a normal attack.
              – HellSaint
              17 mins ago










            • The question doesn't mention two-weapon fighting, the attacks are on separate turns.
              – David Coffron
              16 mins ago














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            You cannot use two-weapon fighting like that



            This is what the book has to say about two-weapon fighting:




            When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
            that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
            with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
            hand. (PHB 195)




            What the player has proposed is illegal on many accounts:



            • The weapon they used for the Attack action is not used one-handed

            • They were not holding the second weapon in their other hand when they made the first attack.

            Thus you cannot take advantage of two-weapon fighting like this.



            Note: Without the secondary, bonus action attack this is legal. Ie. you can rest a two-handed weapon in one hand after attacking and draw another weapon with your now-free hand.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              The question has been updated to clarify that two-weapon fighting is not used so you may want to revise this answer
              – Sdjz
              27 mins ago










            • It's not two-weapon fighting, though. It's a normal attack.
              – HellSaint
              17 mins ago










            • The question doesn't mention two-weapon fighting, the attacks are on separate turns.
              – David Coffron
              16 mins ago












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            You cannot use two-weapon fighting like that



            This is what the book has to say about two-weapon fighting:




            When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
            that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
            with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
            hand. (PHB 195)




            What the player has proposed is illegal on many accounts:



            • The weapon they used for the Attack action is not used one-handed

            • They were not holding the second weapon in their other hand when they made the first attack.

            Thus you cannot take advantage of two-weapon fighting like this.



            Note: Without the secondary, bonus action attack this is legal. Ie. you can rest a two-handed weapon in one hand after attacking and draw another weapon with your now-free hand.






            share|improve this answer














            You cannot use two-weapon fighting like that



            This is what the book has to say about two-weapon fighting:




            When you take the Attack action and attack with a light melee weapon
            that you're holding in one hand, you can use a bonus action to attack
            with a different light melee weapon that you're holding in the other
            hand. (PHB 195)




            What the player has proposed is illegal on many accounts:



            • The weapon they used for the Attack action is not used one-handed

            • They were not holding the second weapon in their other hand when they made the first attack.

            Thus you cannot take advantage of two-weapon fighting like this.



            Note: Without the secondary, bonus action attack this is legal. Ie. you can rest a two-handed weapon in one hand after attacking and draw another weapon with your now-free hand.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            Szega

            36.3k4151185




            36.3k4151185







            • 3




              The question has been updated to clarify that two-weapon fighting is not used so you may want to revise this answer
              – Sdjz
              27 mins ago










            • It's not two-weapon fighting, though. It's a normal attack.
              – HellSaint
              17 mins ago










            • The question doesn't mention two-weapon fighting, the attacks are on separate turns.
              – David Coffron
              16 mins ago












            • 3




              The question has been updated to clarify that two-weapon fighting is not used so you may want to revise this answer
              – Sdjz
              27 mins ago










            • It's not two-weapon fighting, though. It's a normal attack.
              – HellSaint
              17 mins ago










            • The question doesn't mention two-weapon fighting, the attacks are on separate turns.
              – David Coffron
              16 mins ago







            3




            3




            The question has been updated to clarify that two-weapon fighting is not used so you may want to revise this answer
            – Sdjz
            27 mins ago




            The question has been updated to clarify that two-weapon fighting is not used so you may want to revise this answer
            – Sdjz
            27 mins ago












            It's not two-weapon fighting, though. It's a normal attack.
            – HellSaint
            17 mins ago




            It's not two-weapon fighting, though. It's a normal attack.
            – HellSaint
            17 mins ago












            The question doesn't mention two-weapon fighting, the attacks are on separate turns.
            – David Coffron
            16 mins ago




            The question doesn't mention two-weapon fighting, the attacks are on separate turns.
            – David Coffron
            16 mins ago










            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The closest ruling that comes to mind is the encumbrance ruling, specifically on page 176 of the PHB:




            Carrying Capacity. Your carrying capacity is your Strength score multiplied by 15, This is the weight (in pounds) that you can carry, which is high enough that most characters don't usually have to worry about it.



            Push, Drag, or Lift. You can push drag or lift [emphasis mine] a weight in pounds up to twice your carrying capacity (or 30 times your Strength score)...




            Given the above and that the heaviest melee weapon in the PHB, the pike, weighs only 18 pounds, per RAW, the character in question can, in fact, lift, drag, carry, or otherwise grip the idle weapon in one hand without dropping it. (Barring any crazy amounts of gear already shouldered by the character or a ridiculously low strength score).



            It's also worth noting the rules on two handed weapons (PHB p. 147) and that you only need two hands on it to use it. Nothing is mentioned about a character being unable hold it in one hand or to let it hang or drag.




            Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use [emphasis mine].




            Assuming that the character had an extra attack to make, is trying to draw the one handed weapon after swinging the two hander, and is not trying to manipulate the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, everything is doable.



            I personally disagree with the decision made by the ST/GM/DM in this situation, but they are the one running the game and it is their call. I would politely bring the above rules to their attention and make your case.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.













            • 2




              Welcome to RPG.SE! You may be interested in taking our tour to learn more about us. We're still trying to nail down exactly what OP is asking here, but the rules around encumbrance really aren't the issue here. You can also look at this question to help guide you on what it means to use vs hold a two-handed weapon.
              – NautArch
              1 hour ago














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The closest ruling that comes to mind is the encumbrance ruling, specifically on page 176 of the PHB:




            Carrying Capacity. Your carrying capacity is your Strength score multiplied by 15, This is the weight (in pounds) that you can carry, which is high enough that most characters don't usually have to worry about it.



            Push, Drag, or Lift. You can push drag or lift [emphasis mine] a weight in pounds up to twice your carrying capacity (or 30 times your Strength score)...




            Given the above and that the heaviest melee weapon in the PHB, the pike, weighs only 18 pounds, per RAW, the character in question can, in fact, lift, drag, carry, or otherwise grip the idle weapon in one hand without dropping it. (Barring any crazy amounts of gear already shouldered by the character or a ridiculously low strength score).



            It's also worth noting the rules on two handed weapons (PHB p. 147) and that you only need two hands on it to use it. Nothing is mentioned about a character being unable hold it in one hand or to let it hang or drag.




            Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use [emphasis mine].




            Assuming that the character had an extra attack to make, is trying to draw the one handed weapon after swinging the two hander, and is not trying to manipulate the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, everything is doable.



            I personally disagree with the decision made by the ST/GM/DM in this situation, but they are the one running the game and it is their call. I would politely bring the above rules to their attention and make your case.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.













            • 2




              Welcome to RPG.SE! You may be interested in taking our tour to learn more about us. We're still trying to nail down exactly what OP is asking here, but the rules around encumbrance really aren't the issue here. You can also look at this question to help guide you on what it means to use vs hold a two-handed weapon.
              – NautArch
              1 hour ago












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            The closest ruling that comes to mind is the encumbrance ruling, specifically on page 176 of the PHB:




            Carrying Capacity. Your carrying capacity is your Strength score multiplied by 15, This is the weight (in pounds) that you can carry, which is high enough that most characters don't usually have to worry about it.



            Push, Drag, or Lift. You can push drag or lift [emphasis mine] a weight in pounds up to twice your carrying capacity (or 30 times your Strength score)...




            Given the above and that the heaviest melee weapon in the PHB, the pike, weighs only 18 pounds, per RAW, the character in question can, in fact, lift, drag, carry, or otherwise grip the idle weapon in one hand without dropping it. (Barring any crazy amounts of gear already shouldered by the character or a ridiculously low strength score).



            It's also worth noting the rules on two handed weapons (PHB p. 147) and that you only need two hands on it to use it. Nothing is mentioned about a character being unable hold it in one hand or to let it hang or drag.




            Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use [emphasis mine].




            Assuming that the character had an extra attack to make, is trying to draw the one handed weapon after swinging the two hander, and is not trying to manipulate the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, everything is doable.



            I personally disagree with the decision made by the ST/GM/DM in this situation, but they are the one running the game and it is their call. I would politely bring the above rules to their attention and make your case.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            The closest ruling that comes to mind is the encumbrance ruling, specifically on page 176 of the PHB:




            Carrying Capacity. Your carrying capacity is your Strength score multiplied by 15, This is the weight (in pounds) that you can carry, which is high enough that most characters don't usually have to worry about it.



            Push, Drag, or Lift. You can push drag or lift [emphasis mine] a weight in pounds up to twice your carrying capacity (or 30 times your Strength score)...




            Given the above and that the heaviest melee weapon in the PHB, the pike, weighs only 18 pounds, per RAW, the character in question can, in fact, lift, drag, carry, or otherwise grip the idle weapon in one hand without dropping it. (Barring any crazy amounts of gear already shouldered by the character or a ridiculously low strength score).



            It's also worth noting the rules on two handed weapons (PHB p. 147) and that you only need two hands on it to use it. Nothing is mentioned about a character being unable hold it in one hand or to let it hang or drag.




            Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use [emphasis mine].




            Assuming that the character had an extra attack to make, is trying to draw the one handed weapon after swinging the two hander, and is not trying to manipulate the Two-Weapon Fighting rules, everything is doable.



            I personally disagree with the decision made by the ST/GM/DM in this situation, but they are the one running the game and it is their call. I would politely bring the above rules to their attention and make your case.







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 55 mins ago









            SevenSidedDie♦

            201k26641921




            201k26641921






            New contributor




            Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 1 hour ago









            Token

            111




            111




            New contributor




            Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.







            • 2




              Welcome to RPG.SE! You may be interested in taking our tour to learn more about us. We're still trying to nail down exactly what OP is asking here, but the rules around encumbrance really aren't the issue here. You can also look at this question to help guide you on what it means to use vs hold a two-handed weapon.
              – NautArch
              1 hour ago












            • 2




              Welcome to RPG.SE! You may be interested in taking our tour to learn more about us. We're still trying to nail down exactly what OP is asking here, but the rules around encumbrance really aren't the issue here. You can also look at this question to help guide you on what it means to use vs hold a two-handed weapon.
              – NautArch
              1 hour ago







            2




            2




            Welcome to RPG.SE! You may be interested in taking our tour to learn more about us. We're still trying to nail down exactly what OP is asking here, but the rules around encumbrance really aren't the issue here. You can also look at this question to help guide you on what it means to use vs hold a two-handed weapon.
            – NautArch
            1 hour ago




            Welcome to RPG.SE! You may be interested in taking our tour to learn more about us. We're still trying to nail down exactly what OP is asking here, but the rules around encumbrance really aren't the issue here. You can also look at this question to help guide you on what it means to use vs hold a two-handed weapon.
            – NautArch
            1 hour ago










            Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Dragon-Fury-X01 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135182%2fcan-you-drop-one-hand-from-a-two-handed-weapon-to-draw-and-use-a-single-handed-w%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            One-line joke