Why does this microswitch datasheet specify a minimum load current?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












The Omron VX series datasheet mentions on page 6 that "Using a model for ordinary loads to open or close the contact of a micro load circuit may result in faulty contact.", and shows that their micro load models even still require a minimum of 1mA @ 5V. Their D3V datasheet goes further and explicitly marks the low end as being an "inoperable range". But neither datasheet explains why a microswitch would have a problem with a low load condition. Why is this, and what would happen if a microswitch was operated at loads lower than the minimum operating range?










share|improve this question







New contributor




bdonlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2




    This has been asked several time. Search for "wetting current". TL;DR: The contacts oxygenize and it needs a minium current and voltage to "burn" them free. Gold contacts typically have much lower minimal current.
    – Andy
    1 hour ago










  • Good question, I think it's related to the contact coating, micro load are gold coated and normal load are silver coated and probably has to do with silver oxidizing and needing a minimum current to break the oxide layer when contacting, the gold contact doesn't have this issue but might in other hand be more mechanically sensitive.
    – Damien
    1 hour ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












The Omron VX series datasheet mentions on page 6 that "Using a model for ordinary loads to open or close the contact of a micro load circuit may result in faulty contact.", and shows that their micro load models even still require a minimum of 1mA @ 5V. Their D3V datasheet goes further and explicitly marks the low end as being an "inoperable range". But neither datasheet explains why a microswitch would have a problem with a low load condition. Why is this, and what would happen if a microswitch was operated at loads lower than the minimum operating range?










share|improve this question







New contributor




bdonlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2




    This has been asked several time. Search for "wetting current". TL;DR: The contacts oxygenize and it needs a minium current and voltage to "burn" them free. Gold contacts typically have much lower minimal current.
    – Andy
    1 hour ago










  • Good question, I think it's related to the contact coating, micro load are gold coated and normal load are silver coated and probably has to do with silver oxidizing and needing a minimum current to break the oxide layer when contacting, the gold contact doesn't have this issue but might in other hand be more mechanically sensitive.
    – Damien
    1 hour ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1






1





The Omron VX series datasheet mentions on page 6 that "Using a model for ordinary loads to open or close the contact of a micro load circuit may result in faulty contact.", and shows that their micro load models even still require a minimum of 1mA @ 5V. Their D3V datasheet goes further and explicitly marks the low end as being an "inoperable range". But neither datasheet explains why a microswitch would have a problem with a low load condition. Why is this, and what would happen if a microswitch was operated at loads lower than the minimum operating range?










share|improve this question







New contributor




bdonlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











The Omron VX series datasheet mentions on page 6 that "Using a model for ordinary loads to open or close the contact of a micro load circuit may result in faulty contact.", and shows that their micro load models even still require a minimum of 1mA @ 5V. Their D3V datasheet goes further and explicitly marks the low end as being an "inoperable range". But neither datasheet explains why a microswitch would have a problem with a low load condition. Why is this, and what would happen if a microswitch was operated at loads lower than the minimum operating range?







switches datasheet low-power specifications






share|improve this question







New contributor




bdonlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




bdonlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




bdonlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









bdonlan

1134




1134




New contributor




bdonlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





bdonlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






bdonlan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2




    This has been asked several time. Search for "wetting current". TL;DR: The contacts oxygenize and it needs a minium current and voltage to "burn" them free. Gold contacts typically have much lower minimal current.
    – Andy
    1 hour ago










  • Good question, I think it's related to the contact coating, micro load are gold coated and normal load are silver coated and probably has to do with silver oxidizing and needing a minimum current to break the oxide layer when contacting, the gold contact doesn't have this issue but might in other hand be more mechanically sensitive.
    – Damien
    1 hour ago












  • 2




    This has been asked several time. Search for "wetting current". TL;DR: The contacts oxygenize and it needs a minium current and voltage to "burn" them free. Gold contacts typically have much lower minimal current.
    – Andy
    1 hour ago










  • Good question, I think it's related to the contact coating, micro load are gold coated and normal load are silver coated and probably has to do with silver oxidizing and needing a minimum current to break the oxide layer when contacting, the gold contact doesn't have this issue but might in other hand be more mechanically sensitive.
    – Damien
    1 hour ago







2




2




This has been asked several time. Search for "wetting current". TL;DR: The contacts oxygenize and it needs a minium current and voltage to "burn" them free. Gold contacts typically have much lower minimal current.
– Andy
1 hour ago




This has been asked several time. Search for "wetting current". TL;DR: The contacts oxygenize and it needs a minium current and voltage to "burn" them free. Gold contacts typically have much lower minimal current.
– Andy
1 hour ago












Good question, I think it's related to the contact coating, micro load are gold coated and normal load are silver coated and probably has to do with silver oxidizing and needing a minimum current to break the oxide layer when contacting, the gold contact doesn't have this issue but might in other hand be more mechanically sensitive.
– Damien
1 hour ago




Good question, I think it's related to the contact coating, micro load are gold coated and normal load are silver coated and probably has to do with silver oxidizing and needing a minimum current to break the oxide layer when contacting, the gold contact doesn't have this issue but might in other hand be more mechanically sensitive.
– Damien
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










The switch is available in Gold (Au) and Silver (Ag) alloy.

Gold allows switching of low voltage and current signals, such as measurements.

Silver allows switching of high voltage and current, such as power and coils.



This difference is because the contact material degrades over time and per switching action, and a low voltage might not be able to get any current though the high resistance oxidation layer on the contacts.



This why gold plated contacts exist. (Au)

However, high current arcing destroys the gold plating, which is why Silver Nickel + Gold plating exist (AgNi + Au) to get the best of both.

When using low current, the gold remains intact, but when switching high current the gold is destroyed and the properties of a Silver Nickel contact apply.



See also the Fundamentals of Relay Technology.






share|improve this answer
















  • 2




    And there are AgNI + Au contacts where the gold coating is so thin that it only prevents oxidation while storage and gets mechanically destroyed after the first few switch cycles
    – Andy
    57 mins ago










  • So, if I understand this correctly, the actual failure mode is an increase in contact resistance over time resulting in the pull-up being too strong relative to the switch contact resistance? Wouldn't this be a violation of the contact resistance spec, or does >1mA of current have some sort of healing effect that removes the oxidation?
    – bdonlan
    11 mins ago










  • Found the answer in the PDF you linked: "In addition to the constant cleaning effect due to contact friction, this switching spark assumes the function of penetrating non-conductive contamination layers that are formed on the contact surfaces of power contacts."
    – bdonlan
    7 mins ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






bdonlan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f403324%2fwhy-does-this-microswitch-datasheet-specify-a-minimum-load-current%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote



accepted










The switch is available in Gold (Au) and Silver (Ag) alloy.

Gold allows switching of low voltage and current signals, such as measurements.

Silver allows switching of high voltage and current, such as power and coils.



This difference is because the contact material degrades over time and per switching action, and a low voltage might not be able to get any current though the high resistance oxidation layer on the contacts.



This why gold plated contacts exist. (Au)

However, high current arcing destroys the gold plating, which is why Silver Nickel + Gold plating exist (AgNi + Au) to get the best of both.

When using low current, the gold remains intact, but when switching high current the gold is destroyed and the properties of a Silver Nickel contact apply.



See also the Fundamentals of Relay Technology.






share|improve this answer
















  • 2




    And there are AgNI + Au contacts where the gold coating is so thin that it only prevents oxidation while storage and gets mechanically destroyed after the first few switch cycles
    – Andy
    57 mins ago










  • So, if I understand this correctly, the actual failure mode is an increase in contact resistance over time resulting in the pull-up being too strong relative to the switch contact resistance? Wouldn't this be a violation of the contact resistance spec, or does >1mA of current have some sort of healing effect that removes the oxidation?
    – bdonlan
    11 mins ago










  • Found the answer in the PDF you linked: "In addition to the constant cleaning effect due to contact friction, this switching spark assumes the function of penetrating non-conductive contamination layers that are formed on the contact surfaces of power contacts."
    – bdonlan
    7 mins ago














up vote
4
down vote



accepted










The switch is available in Gold (Au) and Silver (Ag) alloy.

Gold allows switching of low voltage and current signals, such as measurements.

Silver allows switching of high voltage and current, such as power and coils.



This difference is because the contact material degrades over time and per switching action, and a low voltage might not be able to get any current though the high resistance oxidation layer on the contacts.



This why gold plated contacts exist. (Au)

However, high current arcing destroys the gold plating, which is why Silver Nickel + Gold plating exist (AgNi + Au) to get the best of both.

When using low current, the gold remains intact, but when switching high current the gold is destroyed and the properties of a Silver Nickel contact apply.



See also the Fundamentals of Relay Technology.






share|improve this answer
















  • 2




    And there are AgNI + Au contacts where the gold coating is so thin that it only prevents oxidation while storage and gets mechanically destroyed after the first few switch cycles
    – Andy
    57 mins ago










  • So, if I understand this correctly, the actual failure mode is an increase in contact resistance over time resulting in the pull-up being too strong relative to the switch contact resistance? Wouldn't this be a violation of the contact resistance spec, or does >1mA of current have some sort of healing effect that removes the oxidation?
    – bdonlan
    11 mins ago










  • Found the answer in the PDF you linked: "In addition to the constant cleaning effect due to contact friction, this switching spark assumes the function of penetrating non-conductive contamination layers that are formed on the contact surfaces of power contacts."
    – bdonlan
    7 mins ago












up vote
4
down vote



accepted







up vote
4
down vote



accepted






The switch is available in Gold (Au) and Silver (Ag) alloy.

Gold allows switching of low voltage and current signals, such as measurements.

Silver allows switching of high voltage and current, such as power and coils.



This difference is because the contact material degrades over time and per switching action, and a low voltage might not be able to get any current though the high resistance oxidation layer on the contacts.



This why gold plated contacts exist. (Au)

However, high current arcing destroys the gold plating, which is why Silver Nickel + Gold plating exist (AgNi + Au) to get the best of both.

When using low current, the gold remains intact, but when switching high current the gold is destroyed and the properties of a Silver Nickel contact apply.



See also the Fundamentals of Relay Technology.






share|improve this answer












The switch is available in Gold (Au) and Silver (Ag) alloy.

Gold allows switching of low voltage and current signals, such as measurements.

Silver allows switching of high voltage and current, such as power and coils.



This difference is because the contact material degrades over time and per switching action, and a low voltage might not be able to get any current though the high resistance oxidation layer on the contacts.



This why gold plated contacts exist. (Au)

However, high current arcing destroys the gold plating, which is why Silver Nickel + Gold plating exist (AgNi + Au) to get the best of both.

When using low current, the gold remains intact, but when switching high current the gold is destroyed and the properties of a Silver Nickel contact apply.



See also the Fundamentals of Relay Technology.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









Jeroen3

10.1k1343




10.1k1343







  • 2




    And there are AgNI + Au contacts where the gold coating is so thin that it only prevents oxidation while storage and gets mechanically destroyed after the first few switch cycles
    – Andy
    57 mins ago










  • So, if I understand this correctly, the actual failure mode is an increase in contact resistance over time resulting in the pull-up being too strong relative to the switch contact resistance? Wouldn't this be a violation of the contact resistance spec, or does >1mA of current have some sort of healing effect that removes the oxidation?
    – bdonlan
    11 mins ago










  • Found the answer in the PDF you linked: "In addition to the constant cleaning effect due to contact friction, this switching spark assumes the function of penetrating non-conductive contamination layers that are formed on the contact surfaces of power contacts."
    – bdonlan
    7 mins ago












  • 2




    And there are AgNI + Au contacts where the gold coating is so thin that it only prevents oxidation while storage and gets mechanically destroyed after the first few switch cycles
    – Andy
    57 mins ago










  • So, if I understand this correctly, the actual failure mode is an increase in contact resistance over time resulting in the pull-up being too strong relative to the switch contact resistance? Wouldn't this be a violation of the contact resistance spec, or does >1mA of current have some sort of healing effect that removes the oxidation?
    – bdonlan
    11 mins ago










  • Found the answer in the PDF you linked: "In addition to the constant cleaning effect due to contact friction, this switching spark assumes the function of penetrating non-conductive contamination layers that are formed on the contact surfaces of power contacts."
    – bdonlan
    7 mins ago







2




2




And there are AgNI + Au contacts where the gold coating is so thin that it only prevents oxidation while storage and gets mechanically destroyed after the first few switch cycles
– Andy
57 mins ago




And there are AgNI + Au contacts where the gold coating is so thin that it only prevents oxidation while storage and gets mechanically destroyed after the first few switch cycles
– Andy
57 mins ago












So, if I understand this correctly, the actual failure mode is an increase in contact resistance over time resulting in the pull-up being too strong relative to the switch contact resistance? Wouldn't this be a violation of the contact resistance spec, or does >1mA of current have some sort of healing effect that removes the oxidation?
– bdonlan
11 mins ago




So, if I understand this correctly, the actual failure mode is an increase in contact resistance over time resulting in the pull-up being too strong relative to the switch contact resistance? Wouldn't this be a violation of the contact resistance spec, or does >1mA of current have some sort of healing effect that removes the oxidation?
– bdonlan
11 mins ago












Found the answer in the PDF you linked: "In addition to the constant cleaning effect due to contact friction, this switching spark assumes the function of penetrating non-conductive contamination layers that are formed on the contact surfaces of power contacts."
– bdonlan
7 mins ago




Found the answer in the PDF you linked: "In addition to the constant cleaning effect due to contact friction, this switching spark assumes the function of penetrating non-conductive contamination layers that are formed on the contact surfaces of power contacts."
– bdonlan
7 mins ago










bdonlan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















bdonlan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












bdonlan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











bdonlan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f403324%2fwhy-does-this-microswitch-datasheet-specify-a-minimum-load-current%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Confectionery