What defines an armor?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
0
down vote

favorite












There are some spells and perks that require not having armor on to work, so how is armor defined?



Is it just any equippable gear that has additional AC? Is it anything more durable than regular fabric (like leather)?



Mechanically speaking, if I start wearing something that boosts my AC, like a single gauntlet, would that end Stone's Durability, Mage Armor, or Unarmored Defense?










share|improve this question









New contributor




guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    Related: Does Mage Armor count as armor for the monk's class features?, Is a Shield considered to be Armor when addressing Armor Proficiency?, Do Bracers of Defense stack with Mage Armor? (this last one is directly relevant to your last question)
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    (Also, note that "a single bracer/gauntlet" wouldn't give you any benefit, assuming it's one of a pair like the Bracers of Defense. You'd need both.)
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    I changed Unarmored Defence to Unarmored Defense. Normally I wouldn't be so picky about American vs English spelling (both are fine on RPG.SE), but technically "Unarmored Defense" is the name of a class feature, so I thought it best to preserve the feature's spelling.
    – NathanS
    1 hour ago

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












There are some spells and perks that require not having armor on to work, so how is armor defined?



Is it just any equippable gear that has additional AC? Is it anything more durable than regular fabric (like leather)?



Mechanically speaking, if I start wearing something that boosts my AC, like a single gauntlet, would that end Stone's Durability, Mage Armor, or Unarmored Defense?










share|improve this question









New contributor




guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    Related: Does Mage Armor count as armor for the monk's class features?, Is a Shield considered to be Armor when addressing Armor Proficiency?, Do Bracers of Defense stack with Mage Armor? (this last one is directly relevant to your last question)
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    (Also, note that "a single bracer/gauntlet" wouldn't give you any benefit, assuming it's one of a pair like the Bracers of Defense. You'd need both.)
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    I changed Unarmored Defence to Unarmored Defense. Normally I wouldn't be so picky about American vs English spelling (both are fine on RPG.SE), but technically "Unarmored Defense" is the name of a class feature, so I thought it best to preserve the feature's spelling.
    – NathanS
    1 hour ago













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











There are some spells and perks that require not having armor on to work, so how is armor defined?



Is it just any equippable gear that has additional AC? Is it anything more durable than regular fabric (like leather)?



Mechanically speaking, if I start wearing something that boosts my AC, like a single gauntlet, would that end Stone's Durability, Mage Armor, or Unarmored Defense?










share|improve this question









New contributor




guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











There are some spells and perks that require not having armor on to work, so how is armor defined?



Is it just any equippable gear that has additional AC? Is it anything more durable than regular fabric (like leather)?



Mechanically speaking, if I start wearing something that boosts my AC, like a single gauntlet, would that end Stone's Durability, Mage Armor, or Unarmored Defense?







dnd-5e armor armor-class






share|improve this question









New contributor




guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









NathanS

16.8k471179




16.8k471179






New contributor




guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









guest

453




453




New contributor




guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    Related: Does Mage Armor count as armor for the monk's class features?, Is a Shield considered to be Armor when addressing Armor Proficiency?, Do Bracers of Defense stack with Mage Armor? (this last one is directly relevant to your last question)
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    (Also, note that "a single bracer/gauntlet" wouldn't give you any benefit, assuming it's one of a pair like the Bracers of Defense. You'd need both.)
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    I changed Unarmored Defence to Unarmored Defense. Normally I wouldn't be so picky about American vs English spelling (both are fine on RPG.SE), but technically "Unarmored Defense" is the name of a class feature, so I thought it best to preserve the feature's spelling.
    – NathanS
    1 hour ago













  • 1




    Related: Does Mage Armor count as armor for the monk's class features?, Is a Shield considered to be Armor when addressing Armor Proficiency?, Do Bracers of Defense stack with Mage Armor? (this last one is directly relevant to your last question)
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago






  • 2




    (Also, note that "a single bracer/gauntlet" wouldn't give you any benefit, assuming it's one of a pair like the Bracers of Defense. You'd need both.)
    – V2Blast
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    I changed Unarmored Defence to Unarmored Defense. Normally I wouldn't be so picky about American vs English spelling (both are fine on RPG.SE), but technically "Unarmored Defense" is the name of a class feature, so I thought it best to preserve the feature's spelling.
    – NathanS
    1 hour ago








1




1




Related: Does Mage Armor count as armor for the monk's class features?, Is a Shield considered to be Armor when addressing Armor Proficiency?, Do Bracers of Defense stack with Mage Armor? (this last one is directly relevant to your last question)
– V2Blast
2 hours ago




Related: Does Mage Armor count as armor for the monk's class features?, Is a Shield considered to be Armor when addressing Armor Proficiency?, Do Bracers of Defense stack with Mage Armor? (this last one is directly relevant to your last question)
– V2Blast
2 hours ago




2




2




(Also, note that "a single bracer/gauntlet" wouldn't give you any benefit, assuming it's one of a pair like the Bracers of Defense. You'd need both.)
– V2Blast
2 hours ago




(Also, note that "a single bracer/gauntlet" wouldn't give you any benefit, assuming it's one of a pair like the Bracers of Defense. You'd need both.)
– V2Blast
2 hours ago




1




1




I changed Unarmored Defence to Unarmored Defense. Normally I wouldn't be so picky about American vs English spelling (both are fine on RPG.SE), but technically "Unarmored Defense" is the name of a class feature, so I thought it best to preserve the feature's spelling.
– NathanS
1 hour ago





I changed Unarmored Defence to Unarmored Defense. Normally I wouldn't be so picky about American vs English spelling (both are fine on RPG.SE), but technically "Unarmored Defense" is the name of a class feature, so I thought it best to preserve the feature's spelling.
– NathanS
1 hour ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Armor refers to a set of armor



Armor is always referred to in sets. Taking the general description of Heavy Armor from the PHB (pg. 145):




Of all the armor categories, heavy armor offers the best protection. These suits of armor cover the entire body and are designed to stop a wide range of attacks.




Also Plate armor specifically, as an example, from the PHB (pg. 145):




Plate. Plate consists of shaped, interlocking metal plates to cover the entire body. A suit of plate includes gauntlets, heavy leather boots, a visored helmet, and thick layers of padding underneath the armor.




Finally, from PHB (pg. 146), the section on Getting Into and Out of Armor says this for donning armor:




Don. This is the time it takes to put on armor. You benefit from the armor's AC only if you take the full time to don the suit of armor.




From this, it appears to me as though armor is supposed to be worn as a suit, and wearing a single gauntlet wouldn't affect your AC at all.



Therefore, no, wearing a gauntlet won't end the Mage Armor spell or interfere with Unarmored Defense or anything like that, since it doesn't affect your AC.




As an aside, some playable races (such as Lizardfolk from Volo's Guide to Monsters) have "natural armor", and according to this answer to a question about natural armor and Unarmored Defense, natural armor isn't compatible with Unarmored Defense, Mage Armor, etc. as it calculates AC differently.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Perhaps a mention of the natural amour of certain races (which I believe also counts as "armour")?
    – PJRZ
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    I am not sure about Natural Armor counting as armor in general, the reason stated for it being incompatible with Unarmored Defense and Mage Armor is because it is a different "armor calculation" method. It is not clear to me that having some form of Natural Armor is incompatible with, say, the Monk's Unarmored Movement
    – Sdjz
    52 mins ago










  • @Sdjz. I don't currently have access to the books so didn't want to add my own answer without refs. But personally I would say "armor" is anything that says it is, well, armor! This includes anything listed under the Armor section in the PHB as per NathanS' answer, but also anything named "armor" that just provides a straightforward calculation for AC (like natural armor, which has "armor" right there in the name). This is opposed to, say, an item that just says it provides a +X bonus to AC.
    – PJRZ
    47 mins ago











  • @guest I'm glad you like my answer, but generally it's best to wait about 24h before accepting an answer to give people from different time zones a chance to answer, and you may prefer their answers to mine. When a question has an accepted answer, others are less likely to post their own answers.
    – NathanS
    42 mins ago










  • @PJRZ Oh to be clear I am not stating that Natural Armor counts or not as armor. All I am saying is that the linked is not saying that either. I actually agree it makes sense for Natural Armor to count as "Armor". My problem is not with the conclusion, my problem was with the argument that the linked answer is stating that natural counts as armor in general which isn't what the answer is saying, if that makes sense. May be better if we hop into Role-playing Games Chat if that isn't clear.
    – Sdjz
    38 mins ago











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






guest is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132814%2fwhat-defines-an-armor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Armor refers to a set of armor



Armor is always referred to in sets. Taking the general description of Heavy Armor from the PHB (pg. 145):




Of all the armor categories, heavy armor offers the best protection. These suits of armor cover the entire body and are designed to stop a wide range of attacks.




Also Plate armor specifically, as an example, from the PHB (pg. 145):




Plate. Plate consists of shaped, interlocking metal plates to cover the entire body. A suit of plate includes gauntlets, heavy leather boots, a visored helmet, and thick layers of padding underneath the armor.




Finally, from PHB (pg. 146), the section on Getting Into and Out of Armor says this for donning armor:




Don. This is the time it takes to put on armor. You benefit from the armor's AC only if you take the full time to don the suit of armor.




From this, it appears to me as though armor is supposed to be worn as a suit, and wearing a single gauntlet wouldn't affect your AC at all.



Therefore, no, wearing a gauntlet won't end the Mage Armor spell or interfere with Unarmored Defense or anything like that, since it doesn't affect your AC.




As an aside, some playable races (such as Lizardfolk from Volo's Guide to Monsters) have "natural armor", and according to this answer to a question about natural armor and Unarmored Defense, natural armor isn't compatible with Unarmored Defense, Mage Armor, etc. as it calculates AC differently.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Perhaps a mention of the natural amour of certain races (which I believe also counts as "armour")?
    – PJRZ
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    I am not sure about Natural Armor counting as armor in general, the reason stated for it being incompatible with Unarmored Defense and Mage Armor is because it is a different "armor calculation" method. It is not clear to me that having some form of Natural Armor is incompatible with, say, the Monk's Unarmored Movement
    – Sdjz
    52 mins ago










  • @Sdjz. I don't currently have access to the books so didn't want to add my own answer without refs. But personally I would say "armor" is anything that says it is, well, armor! This includes anything listed under the Armor section in the PHB as per NathanS' answer, but also anything named "armor" that just provides a straightforward calculation for AC (like natural armor, which has "armor" right there in the name). This is opposed to, say, an item that just says it provides a +X bonus to AC.
    – PJRZ
    47 mins ago











  • @guest I'm glad you like my answer, but generally it's best to wait about 24h before accepting an answer to give people from different time zones a chance to answer, and you may prefer their answers to mine. When a question has an accepted answer, others are less likely to post their own answers.
    – NathanS
    42 mins ago










  • @PJRZ Oh to be clear I am not stating that Natural Armor counts or not as armor. All I am saying is that the linked is not saying that either. I actually agree it makes sense for Natural Armor to count as "Armor". My problem is not with the conclusion, my problem was with the argument that the linked answer is stating that natural counts as armor in general which isn't what the answer is saying, if that makes sense. May be better if we hop into Role-playing Games Chat if that isn't clear.
    – Sdjz
    38 mins ago















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










Armor refers to a set of armor



Armor is always referred to in sets. Taking the general description of Heavy Armor from the PHB (pg. 145):




Of all the armor categories, heavy armor offers the best protection. These suits of armor cover the entire body and are designed to stop a wide range of attacks.




Also Plate armor specifically, as an example, from the PHB (pg. 145):




Plate. Plate consists of shaped, interlocking metal plates to cover the entire body. A suit of plate includes gauntlets, heavy leather boots, a visored helmet, and thick layers of padding underneath the armor.




Finally, from PHB (pg. 146), the section on Getting Into and Out of Armor says this for donning armor:




Don. This is the time it takes to put on armor. You benefit from the armor's AC only if you take the full time to don the suit of armor.




From this, it appears to me as though armor is supposed to be worn as a suit, and wearing a single gauntlet wouldn't affect your AC at all.



Therefore, no, wearing a gauntlet won't end the Mage Armor spell or interfere with Unarmored Defense or anything like that, since it doesn't affect your AC.




As an aside, some playable races (such as Lizardfolk from Volo's Guide to Monsters) have "natural armor", and according to this answer to a question about natural armor and Unarmored Defense, natural armor isn't compatible with Unarmored Defense, Mage Armor, etc. as it calculates AC differently.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Perhaps a mention of the natural amour of certain races (which I believe also counts as "armour")?
    – PJRZ
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    I am not sure about Natural Armor counting as armor in general, the reason stated for it being incompatible with Unarmored Defense and Mage Armor is because it is a different "armor calculation" method. It is not clear to me that having some form of Natural Armor is incompatible with, say, the Monk's Unarmored Movement
    – Sdjz
    52 mins ago










  • @Sdjz. I don't currently have access to the books so didn't want to add my own answer without refs. But personally I would say "armor" is anything that says it is, well, armor! This includes anything listed under the Armor section in the PHB as per NathanS' answer, but also anything named "armor" that just provides a straightforward calculation for AC (like natural armor, which has "armor" right there in the name). This is opposed to, say, an item that just says it provides a +X bonus to AC.
    – PJRZ
    47 mins ago











  • @guest I'm glad you like my answer, but generally it's best to wait about 24h before accepting an answer to give people from different time zones a chance to answer, and you may prefer their answers to mine. When a question has an accepted answer, others are less likely to post their own answers.
    – NathanS
    42 mins ago










  • @PJRZ Oh to be clear I am not stating that Natural Armor counts or not as armor. All I am saying is that the linked is not saying that either. I actually agree it makes sense for Natural Armor to count as "Armor". My problem is not with the conclusion, my problem was with the argument that the linked answer is stating that natural counts as armor in general which isn't what the answer is saying, if that makes sense. May be better if we hop into Role-playing Games Chat if that isn't clear.
    – Sdjz
    38 mins ago













up vote
5
down vote



accepted







up vote
5
down vote



accepted






Armor refers to a set of armor



Armor is always referred to in sets. Taking the general description of Heavy Armor from the PHB (pg. 145):




Of all the armor categories, heavy armor offers the best protection. These suits of armor cover the entire body and are designed to stop a wide range of attacks.




Also Plate armor specifically, as an example, from the PHB (pg. 145):




Plate. Plate consists of shaped, interlocking metal plates to cover the entire body. A suit of plate includes gauntlets, heavy leather boots, a visored helmet, and thick layers of padding underneath the armor.




Finally, from PHB (pg. 146), the section on Getting Into and Out of Armor says this for donning armor:




Don. This is the time it takes to put on armor. You benefit from the armor's AC only if you take the full time to don the suit of armor.




From this, it appears to me as though armor is supposed to be worn as a suit, and wearing a single gauntlet wouldn't affect your AC at all.



Therefore, no, wearing a gauntlet won't end the Mage Armor spell or interfere with Unarmored Defense or anything like that, since it doesn't affect your AC.




As an aside, some playable races (such as Lizardfolk from Volo's Guide to Monsters) have "natural armor", and according to this answer to a question about natural armor and Unarmored Defense, natural armor isn't compatible with Unarmored Defense, Mage Armor, etc. as it calculates AC differently.






share|improve this answer














Armor refers to a set of armor



Armor is always referred to in sets. Taking the general description of Heavy Armor from the PHB (pg. 145):




Of all the armor categories, heavy armor offers the best protection. These suits of armor cover the entire body and are designed to stop a wide range of attacks.




Also Plate armor specifically, as an example, from the PHB (pg. 145):




Plate. Plate consists of shaped, interlocking metal plates to cover the entire body. A suit of plate includes gauntlets, heavy leather boots, a visored helmet, and thick layers of padding underneath the armor.




Finally, from PHB (pg. 146), the section on Getting Into and Out of Armor says this for donning armor:




Don. This is the time it takes to put on armor. You benefit from the armor's AC only if you take the full time to don the suit of armor.




From this, it appears to me as though armor is supposed to be worn as a suit, and wearing a single gauntlet wouldn't affect your AC at all.



Therefore, no, wearing a gauntlet won't end the Mage Armor spell or interfere with Unarmored Defense or anything like that, since it doesn't affect your AC.




As an aside, some playable races (such as Lizardfolk from Volo's Guide to Monsters) have "natural armor", and according to this answer to a question about natural armor and Unarmored Defense, natural armor isn't compatible with Unarmored Defense, Mage Armor, etc. as it calculates AC differently.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 38 mins ago

























answered 1 hour ago









NathanS

16.8k471179




16.8k471179







  • 1




    Perhaps a mention of the natural amour of certain races (which I believe also counts as "armour")?
    – PJRZ
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    I am not sure about Natural Armor counting as armor in general, the reason stated for it being incompatible with Unarmored Defense and Mage Armor is because it is a different "armor calculation" method. It is not clear to me that having some form of Natural Armor is incompatible with, say, the Monk's Unarmored Movement
    – Sdjz
    52 mins ago










  • @Sdjz. I don't currently have access to the books so didn't want to add my own answer without refs. But personally I would say "armor" is anything that says it is, well, armor! This includes anything listed under the Armor section in the PHB as per NathanS' answer, but also anything named "armor" that just provides a straightforward calculation for AC (like natural armor, which has "armor" right there in the name). This is opposed to, say, an item that just says it provides a +X bonus to AC.
    – PJRZ
    47 mins ago











  • @guest I'm glad you like my answer, but generally it's best to wait about 24h before accepting an answer to give people from different time zones a chance to answer, and you may prefer their answers to mine. When a question has an accepted answer, others are less likely to post their own answers.
    – NathanS
    42 mins ago










  • @PJRZ Oh to be clear I am not stating that Natural Armor counts or not as armor. All I am saying is that the linked is not saying that either. I actually agree it makes sense for Natural Armor to count as "Armor". My problem is not with the conclusion, my problem was with the argument that the linked answer is stating that natural counts as armor in general which isn't what the answer is saying, if that makes sense. May be better if we hop into Role-playing Games Chat if that isn't clear.
    – Sdjz
    38 mins ago













  • 1




    Perhaps a mention of the natural amour of certain races (which I believe also counts as "armour")?
    – PJRZ
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    I am not sure about Natural Armor counting as armor in general, the reason stated for it being incompatible with Unarmored Defense and Mage Armor is because it is a different "armor calculation" method. It is not clear to me that having some form of Natural Armor is incompatible with, say, the Monk's Unarmored Movement
    – Sdjz
    52 mins ago










  • @Sdjz. I don't currently have access to the books so didn't want to add my own answer without refs. But personally I would say "armor" is anything that says it is, well, armor! This includes anything listed under the Armor section in the PHB as per NathanS' answer, but also anything named "armor" that just provides a straightforward calculation for AC (like natural armor, which has "armor" right there in the name). This is opposed to, say, an item that just says it provides a +X bonus to AC.
    – PJRZ
    47 mins ago











  • @guest I'm glad you like my answer, but generally it's best to wait about 24h before accepting an answer to give people from different time zones a chance to answer, and you may prefer their answers to mine. When a question has an accepted answer, others are less likely to post their own answers.
    – NathanS
    42 mins ago










  • @PJRZ Oh to be clear I am not stating that Natural Armor counts or not as armor. All I am saying is that the linked is not saying that either. I actually agree it makes sense for Natural Armor to count as "Armor". My problem is not with the conclusion, my problem was with the argument that the linked answer is stating that natural counts as armor in general which isn't what the answer is saying, if that makes sense. May be better if we hop into Role-playing Games Chat if that isn't clear.
    – Sdjz
    38 mins ago








1




1




Perhaps a mention of the natural amour of certain races (which I believe also counts as "armour")?
– PJRZ
1 hour ago




Perhaps a mention of the natural amour of certain races (which I believe also counts as "armour")?
– PJRZ
1 hour ago




1




1




I am not sure about Natural Armor counting as armor in general, the reason stated for it being incompatible with Unarmored Defense and Mage Armor is because it is a different "armor calculation" method. It is not clear to me that having some form of Natural Armor is incompatible with, say, the Monk's Unarmored Movement
– Sdjz
52 mins ago




I am not sure about Natural Armor counting as armor in general, the reason stated for it being incompatible with Unarmored Defense and Mage Armor is because it is a different "armor calculation" method. It is not clear to me that having some form of Natural Armor is incompatible with, say, the Monk's Unarmored Movement
– Sdjz
52 mins ago












@Sdjz. I don't currently have access to the books so didn't want to add my own answer without refs. But personally I would say "armor" is anything that says it is, well, armor! This includes anything listed under the Armor section in the PHB as per NathanS' answer, but also anything named "armor" that just provides a straightforward calculation for AC (like natural armor, which has "armor" right there in the name). This is opposed to, say, an item that just says it provides a +X bonus to AC.
– PJRZ
47 mins ago





@Sdjz. I don't currently have access to the books so didn't want to add my own answer without refs. But personally I would say "armor" is anything that says it is, well, armor! This includes anything listed under the Armor section in the PHB as per NathanS' answer, but also anything named "armor" that just provides a straightforward calculation for AC (like natural armor, which has "armor" right there in the name). This is opposed to, say, an item that just says it provides a +X bonus to AC.
– PJRZ
47 mins ago













@guest I'm glad you like my answer, but generally it's best to wait about 24h before accepting an answer to give people from different time zones a chance to answer, and you may prefer their answers to mine. When a question has an accepted answer, others are less likely to post their own answers.
– NathanS
42 mins ago




@guest I'm glad you like my answer, but generally it's best to wait about 24h before accepting an answer to give people from different time zones a chance to answer, and you may prefer their answers to mine. When a question has an accepted answer, others are less likely to post their own answers.
– NathanS
42 mins ago












@PJRZ Oh to be clear I am not stating that Natural Armor counts or not as armor. All I am saying is that the linked is not saying that either. I actually agree it makes sense for Natural Armor to count as "Armor". My problem is not with the conclusion, my problem was with the argument that the linked answer is stating that natural counts as armor in general which isn't what the answer is saying, if that makes sense. May be better if we hop into Role-playing Games Chat if that isn't clear.
– Sdjz
38 mins ago





@PJRZ Oh to be clear I am not stating that Natural Armor counts or not as armor. All I am saying is that the linked is not saying that either. I actually agree it makes sense for Natural Armor to count as "Armor". My problem is not with the conclusion, my problem was with the argument that the linked answer is stating that natural counts as armor in general which isn't what the answer is saying, if that makes sense. May be better if we hop into Role-playing Games Chat if that isn't clear.
– Sdjz
38 mins ago











guest is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















guest is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












guest is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











guest is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132814%2fwhat-defines-an-armor%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Confectionery