Weak Axial Relationships according to Grid Systems: Principles of Organizing Type
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I'm confused about this sentence in page 12 of the book "Grid Systems: Principles of Organizing Type":
This relationships is weak because the interior alignments are minimal
Is it because the edges circled with yellow aren't in same line?
typography alignment
New contributor
Chen melon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I'm confused about this sentence in page 12 of the book "Grid Systems: Principles of Organizing Type":
This relationships is weak because the interior alignments are minimal
Is it because the edges circled with yellow aren't in same line?
typography alignment
New contributor
Chen melon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I'm confused about this sentence in page 12 of the book "Grid Systems: Principles of Organizing Type":
This relationships is weak because the interior alignments are minimal
Is it because the edges circled with yellow aren't in same line?
typography alignment
New contributor
Chen melon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm confused about this sentence in page 12 of the book "Grid Systems: Principles of Organizing Type":
This relationships is weak because the interior alignments are minimal
Is it because the edges circled with yellow aren't in same line?
typography alignment
typography alignment
New contributor
Chen melon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Chen melon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 3 hours ago


Luciano
4,75841740
4,75841740
New contributor
Chen melon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago


Chen melon
211
211
New contributor
Chen melon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Chen melon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Chen melon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
This sentence is making a comparison with the previous image and is related to description in the top main paragraph of the page.
It's true the terminology used in the book is somewhat complicated.
In other terms, what it's trying to explain is the more axes of alignment there are on a page, the stronger the composition will be since the objects seem to have a firm support. It has no any relation to the end of the text frame, the yellow ellipsis at the question.
Actually, looking at the gray elements of each image they are exactly the same.
The interior alignments are minimal..., the left image has eight red support points, while the right just five.
The example of a single axis in the left edge is initially weak for two reasons:
- It's at the page boundary, when reading and jumping from a line of text to the next, the eye tends to move out of the page and not going to its content.
- It's a single support for the elements
Try to see it as a shelf with vertical supports, which of both has greater stability?
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
This sentence is making a comparison with the previous image and is related to description in the top main paragraph of the page.
It's true the terminology used in the book is somewhat complicated.
In other terms, what it's trying to explain is the more axes of alignment there are on a page, the stronger the composition will be since the objects seem to have a firm support. It has no any relation to the end of the text frame, the yellow ellipsis at the question.
Actually, looking at the gray elements of each image they are exactly the same.
The interior alignments are minimal..., the left image has eight red support points, while the right just five.
The example of a single axis in the left edge is initially weak for two reasons:
- It's at the page boundary, when reading and jumping from a line of text to the next, the eye tends to move out of the page and not going to its content.
- It's a single support for the elements
Try to see it as a shelf with vertical supports, which of both has greater stability?
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
This sentence is making a comparison with the previous image and is related to description in the top main paragraph of the page.
It's true the terminology used in the book is somewhat complicated.
In other terms, what it's trying to explain is the more axes of alignment there are on a page, the stronger the composition will be since the objects seem to have a firm support. It has no any relation to the end of the text frame, the yellow ellipsis at the question.
Actually, looking at the gray elements of each image they are exactly the same.
The interior alignments are minimal..., the left image has eight red support points, while the right just five.
The example of a single axis in the left edge is initially weak for two reasons:
- It's at the page boundary, when reading and jumping from a line of text to the next, the eye tends to move out of the page and not going to its content.
- It's a single support for the elements
Try to see it as a shelf with vertical supports, which of both has greater stability?
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
This sentence is making a comparison with the previous image and is related to description in the top main paragraph of the page.
It's true the terminology used in the book is somewhat complicated.
In other terms, what it's trying to explain is the more axes of alignment there are on a page, the stronger the composition will be since the objects seem to have a firm support. It has no any relation to the end of the text frame, the yellow ellipsis at the question.
Actually, looking at the gray elements of each image they are exactly the same.
The interior alignments are minimal..., the left image has eight red support points, while the right just five.
The example of a single axis in the left edge is initially weak for two reasons:
- It's at the page boundary, when reading and jumping from a line of text to the next, the eye tends to move out of the page and not going to its content.
- It's a single support for the elements
Try to see it as a shelf with vertical supports, which of both has greater stability?
This sentence is making a comparison with the previous image and is related to description in the top main paragraph of the page.
It's true the terminology used in the book is somewhat complicated.
In other terms, what it's trying to explain is the more axes of alignment there are on a page, the stronger the composition will be since the objects seem to have a firm support. It has no any relation to the end of the text frame, the yellow ellipsis at the question.
Actually, looking at the gray elements of each image they are exactly the same.
The interior alignments are minimal..., the left image has eight red support points, while the right just five.
The example of a single axis in the left edge is initially weak for two reasons:
- It's at the page boundary, when reading and jumping from a line of text to the next, the eye tends to move out of the page and not going to its content.
- It's a single support for the elements
Try to see it as a shelf with vertical supports, which of both has greater stability?
edited 1 hour ago
answered 3 hours ago
Danielillo
15.8k12257
15.8k12257
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Chen melon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Chen melon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Chen melon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Chen melon is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f116604%2fweak-axial-relationships-according-to-grid-systems-principles-of-organizing-typ%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password