Generating function for 3 -core partitions: Part II

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $lambda$ be an integer partition: $lambda=(lambda_1geqlambda_2geqdotsgeq0)$. Further, let $h_u$ denote the hook-length of the cell $u$.



We call $lambda$ a $t$-core partition if none of its hooks $h_u$ equals $t$. Define $c_t(n)$ to be the number of partitions of $n$ that are $t$-core partitions. It's well-known that
$$sum_ngeq0c_t(n),q^n=prod_k=1^inftyfrac(1-q^tk)^t1-q^k.$$
For example, $sum_n=0^inftyc_2(n),q^n=sum_k=0^inftyq^binomk+12$.



Now, consider only those partitions of $n$ with odd parts and let $O_t(n)$ be the number of such partitions that are $t$-cores.




QUESTION. Is this true?
$$sum_ngeq1O_3(n),q^n=(1+q)sum_kgeq1q^k^2.$$











share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $lambda$ be an integer partition: $lambda=(lambda_1geqlambda_2geqdotsgeq0)$. Further, let $h_u$ denote the hook-length of the cell $u$.



    We call $lambda$ a $t$-core partition if none of its hooks $h_u$ equals $t$. Define $c_t(n)$ to be the number of partitions of $n$ that are $t$-core partitions. It's well-known that
    $$sum_ngeq0c_t(n),q^n=prod_k=1^inftyfrac(1-q^tk)^t1-q^k.$$
    For example, $sum_n=0^inftyc_2(n),q^n=sum_k=0^inftyq^binomk+12$.



    Now, consider only those partitions of $n$ with odd parts and let $O_t(n)$ be the number of such partitions that are $t$-cores.




    QUESTION. Is this true?
    $$sum_ngeq1O_3(n),q^n=(1+q)sum_kgeq1q^k^2.$$











    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $lambda$ be an integer partition: $lambda=(lambda_1geqlambda_2geqdotsgeq0)$. Further, let $h_u$ denote the hook-length of the cell $u$.



      We call $lambda$ a $t$-core partition if none of its hooks $h_u$ equals $t$. Define $c_t(n)$ to be the number of partitions of $n$ that are $t$-core partitions. It's well-known that
      $$sum_ngeq0c_t(n),q^n=prod_k=1^inftyfrac(1-q^tk)^t1-q^k.$$
      For example, $sum_n=0^inftyc_2(n),q^n=sum_k=0^inftyq^binomk+12$.



      Now, consider only those partitions of $n$ with odd parts and let $O_t(n)$ be the number of such partitions that are $t$-cores.




      QUESTION. Is this true?
      $$sum_ngeq1O_3(n),q^n=(1+q)sum_kgeq1q^k^2.$$











      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $lambda$ be an integer partition: $lambda=(lambda_1geqlambda_2geqdotsgeq0)$. Further, let $h_u$ denote the hook-length of the cell $u$.



      We call $lambda$ a $t$-core partition if none of its hooks $h_u$ equals $t$. Define $c_t(n)$ to be the number of partitions of $n$ that are $t$-core partitions. It's well-known that
      $$sum_ngeq0c_t(n),q^n=prod_k=1^inftyfrac(1-q^tk)^t1-q^k.$$
      For example, $sum_n=0^inftyc_2(n),q^n=sum_k=0^inftyq^binomk+12$.



      Now, consider only those partitions of $n$ with odd parts and let $O_t(n)$ be the number of such partitions that are $t$-cores.




      QUESTION. Is this true?
      $$sum_ngeq1O_3(n),q^n=(1+q)sum_kgeq1q^k^2.$$








      co.combinatorics soft-question partitions elementary-proofs






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      T. Amdeberhan

      16.5k228122




      16.5k228122




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Suppose the partition with $k$ parts $lambda=lambda_1geq lambda_2geqdotsgeqlambda_kgeq lambda_k+1=0$ is a partition with only odd parts. Then we have $lambda_i-lambda_i+1$ is even for all $ileq k-1$ and odd for $i=k$. Using the same characterization I mentioned in the previous answer we see that the sequence
          $lambda_1-lambda_2,lambda_2-lambda_3,dots,lambda_k-lambda_k+1$ for such a $3$-core has to be equal to $2,2,dots,2,1$ or $2,2,dots,2,0,1$. The first case is a partition with size $k^2$ and the second has size $1+k^2$ which implies the generating function
          $$sum_ngeq1O_3(n),q^n=sum_kgeq1(q^k^2+q^k^2+1).$$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "504"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f312881%2fgenerating-function-for-3-core-partitions-part-ii%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote













            Suppose the partition with $k$ parts $lambda=lambda_1geq lambda_2geqdotsgeqlambda_kgeq lambda_k+1=0$ is a partition with only odd parts. Then we have $lambda_i-lambda_i+1$ is even for all $ileq k-1$ and odd for $i=k$. Using the same characterization I mentioned in the previous answer we see that the sequence
            $lambda_1-lambda_2,lambda_2-lambda_3,dots,lambda_k-lambda_k+1$ for such a $3$-core has to be equal to $2,2,dots,2,1$ or $2,2,dots,2,0,1$. The first case is a partition with size $k^2$ and the second has size $1+k^2$ which implies the generating function
            $$sum_ngeq1O_3(n),q^n=sum_kgeq1(q^k^2+q^k^2+1).$$






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              4
              down vote













              Suppose the partition with $k$ parts $lambda=lambda_1geq lambda_2geqdotsgeqlambda_kgeq lambda_k+1=0$ is a partition with only odd parts. Then we have $lambda_i-lambda_i+1$ is even for all $ileq k-1$ and odd for $i=k$. Using the same characterization I mentioned in the previous answer we see that the sequence
              $lambda_1-lambda_2,lambda_2-lambda_3,dots,lambda_k-lambda_k+1$ for such a $3$-core has to be equal to $2,2,dots,2,1$ or $2,2,dots,2,0,1$. The first case is a partition with size $k^2$ and the second has size $1+k^2$ which implies the generating function
              $$sum_ngeq1O_3(n),q^n=sum_kgeq1(q^k^2+q^k^2+1).$$






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                4
                down vote










                up vote
                4
                down vote









                Suppose the partition with $k$ parts $lambda=lambda_1geq lambda_2geqdotsgeqlambda_kgeq lambda_k+1=0$ is a partition with only odd parts. Then we have $lambda_i-lambda_i+1$ is even for all $ileq k-1$ and odd for $i=k$. Using the same characterization I mentioned in the previous answer we see that the sequence
                $lambda_1-lambda_2,lambda_2-lambda_3,dots,lambda_k-lambda_k+1$ for such a $3$-core has to be equal to $2,2,dots,2,1$ or $2,2,dots,2,0,1$. The first case is a partition with size $k^2$ and the second has size $1+k^2$ which implies the generating function
                $$sum_ngeq1O_3(n),q^n=sum_kgeq1(q^k^2+q^k^2+1).$$






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Suppose the partition with $k$ parts $lambda=lambda_1geq lambda_2geqdotsgeqlambda_kgeq lambda_k+1=0$ is a partition with only odd parts. Then we have $lambda_i-lambda_i+1$ is even for all $ileq k-1$ and odd for $i=k$. Using the same characterization I mentioned in the previous answer we see that the sequence
                $lambda_1-lambda_2,lambda_2-lambda_3,dots,lambda_k-lambda_k+1$ for such a $3$-core has to be equal to $2,2,dots,2,1$ or $2,2,dots,2,0,1$. The first case is a partition with size $k^2$ and the second has size $1+k^2$ which implies the generating function
                $$sum_ngeq1O_3(n),q^n=sum_kgeq1(q^k^2+q^k^2+1).$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 1 hour ago









                Gjergji Zaimi

                60.1k4154296




                60.1k4154296



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f312881%2fgenerating-function-for-3-core-partitions-part-ii%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does second last employer means? [closed]

                    List of Gilmore Girls characters

                    Confectionery